Thailand is the world’s second largest exporter of sugar, and under the 10-Year Cane and Sugar Strategy (2015–2024), the Thai government has granted an expansion of 13 new sugarcane factories. While most research focuses on the environmental consequences of sugarcane production, this paper examines the potential socioeconomic impact of a proposed sugarcane factory on a nearby (base) village by comparing it to a similar (treatment) village within the same region near an existing sugarcane factory. We find that treatment villagers have higher household income mainly due to their sugarcane-based village economy. They also disclose better perceived environmental quality while results for perceived health status are mixed. Yet, base villagers report higher perceived quality of life, likely due to factors beyond the socioeconomic conditions investigated in this study. Thus, the presence of a sugarcane factory, while socioeconomically favorable, may compromise other aspects of village life that contribute to its overall quality.
AaronB.KrebsE.Ishii-AdajarH.ToddC. (2019). How bioindustry will impact the community of Mueang Phia: The implications of a potential sugarcane factory and power plant. CIEE Khon Kaen.
2.
BoonyanamN. (2018). Agricultural zoning and policy conflict: Thailand’s experience. In LouresL. C. (Ed.). Land use - Assessing the past, envisioning the future. IntechOpen. https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/63031
3.
ChayaW.BunnagB.GheewalaS. H. (2018). Adoption, cost and livelihood impact of machinery services used in small-scale sugarcane production in Thailand. Sugar Tech, 21(4), 543–556, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-018-0651-x
4.
ChunhawongK.ChaisanT.RungmekaratS.KhotavivattanaS. (2018). Sugar industry and utilization of its by-products in Thailand: An overview. Sugar Tech, 20(2), 111–115, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-018-0599-x
5.
ConceiçãoP.BanduraR. (2008). Measuring subjective wellbeing: A summary review of the literature. Office of Development Studies, United Nations Development Programme.
DolanP.MetcalfeR. (2012). Measuring subjective wellbeing: Recommendations on measures for use by national governments. Journal of Social Policy, 41(2), 409–427, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047279411000833
8.
EasterlinR. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In DavidP. A.RederM. W. (Eds.), Nations are households in economic growth (pp. 89–125). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-205050-3.50008-7
9.
EasterlinR. A. (1995). Will raising the income of all increase the happiness of all?Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 27(1), 35–47, https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(95)00003-b
10.
FrederickS.LoewensteinG. (1999). Hedonic adaptation. In KahnemanD.DienerE.SchwarzN. (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 302–329). Russell Sage Foundation.
11.
GheewalaS. H.SilalertruksaT.NilsalabP.MungkungR.PerretS. R.ChaiyawannakarnN. (2014). Water footprint and impact of water consumption for food, feed, fuel crops production in thailand. Water, 6(6), 1698–1718, https://doi.org/10.3390/w6061698
12.
GheewalaS. H.SilalertruksaT.PongpatP.BonnetS. (2019). Biofuel production from sugarcane in Thailand. In Sugarcane Biofuels, pp. 157–174, Spring. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18597-8_8
13.
HarteminkA. E. (2008). Sugarcane for bioethanol: Soil and environmental issues. In Advances in Agronomy, 99, pp. 125–182. Science Direct. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2113(08)00403-3
14.
HuntS.McKennaS.McEwenJ.BackettE.WilliamsJ.PappE. (1981). A quantitative approach to perceived health status: A validation study. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 34(4), 281–286, https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.34.4.281
15.
IamratanakulS. (2014). A framework of the innovation system: A case of Thailand. Int. J. Economic Policy in Emerging Economies, 7(2), 111–124, https://doi.org/10.1504/ijepee.2014.063187
16.
KumarS.SalamP.ShresthaP.AckomE. (2013). An assessment of Thailand’s biofuel development. Sustainability, 5(4), 1577–1597, https://doi.org/10.3390/su5041577
17.
LakapunratN.ThapaG. B. (2017). Policies, socioeconomic, institutional and biophysical factors influencing the change from rice to sugarcane in Nong Bua Lamphu Province, Thailand. Environmental Management, 59(6), 924–938, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0843-2
18.
ManivongP.BourgoisE. (2017). White paper: Thai sugarcane sector and sustainability. FairAgora Asia Co Ltd.
19.
MedaliaN. Z.FinknerA. L. (1965). Community perception of air quality: An opinion survey in Clarkston, US Department of Health, Education, Welfare.
NaRanongV. (2013). Proposed reforms in the structure of Thailand’s sugar and cane industry. TDRI Quarterly Review, 26(1), 6–12.
22.
OdermattR.StutzerA. (2017). Subjective well-being and public policy. IZA Institute of Labor Economics Discussion Paper Series, p. 11102.
23.
PongpatP.GheewalaS. H.SilalertruksaT. (2017). An assessment of harvesting practices of sugarcane in the central region of Thailand. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142(3), 1138-1147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.178.
24.
PornprakunW.SungnulS.KiataramkulC.MooreE. J. (2019). Determining optimal policies for sugarcane harvesting in Thailand using bi-objective and quasi-Newton optimization methods. Advances in Difference Equations, 257. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-019-2192-3.
25.
Prasara-AJ.GheewalaS. H. (2016). Sustainability of sugarcane cultivation: Case study of selected sites in north-eastern Thailand. Journal of Cleaner Production, 134(B), 613-622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.029.
26.
SawaengsakW.GheewalaS. H. (2017). Analysis of social and socio-economic impacts of sugarcane production: A case study in Nakhon Ratchasima province of Thailand. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142(3), 1169-1175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.148.
27.
ShieldsM.ShooshtariS. (2002). Determinants of self-rated health. Health Reports/Statistics Canada, Canadian Centre for Health Information. 13(1), 35–52.
28.
SilalertruksaT.PongpatP.GheewalaS. H. (2017). Life cycle assessment for enhancing environmental sustainability of sugarcane biorefinery in Thailand. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 906-913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.010.
29.
SilgeJ.RobinsonD. (2016). Tidytext: Text mining and analysis using tidy data principles in R. Journal of Open Source Software, 1(3).37, https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00037
30.
SironiE.WolffA. (2021). Estimating the impact of social isolation on subjective health in Europe. Quality & Quantity, 55(6), 2087–2102, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01097-8
31.
SrirothK.VanichsriratanaW.SunthornvarabhasJ. (2016). The current status of sugar industry and by-products in Thailand. Sugar Tech, 18(6), 576–582, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-016-0491-5
SulemanaI.McCannLJamesHSJr. (2016). Perceived environmental quality and subjective well-being: Are African countries different from developed countries?International Journal of Happiness and Development, 3(1), 64–87. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijhd.2016.076209
34.
SunS.ChenJ.JohannessonM.KindP.BurstromK. (2016). Subjective well-being and its association with subjective health status, age, sex, region, and socio-economic characteristics of a Chinese population study. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17(2), 833–873, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-014-9611-7
TukaewS.DattaA.ShivakotiG. P.JourdainD. (2015). Production practices influenced yield and commercial cane sugar level of contract sugarcane farmers in Thailand. Sugar Tech, 18(3), 299–308, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-015-0403-0
37.
UllahA.SilalertruksaT.PongpatP.GheewalaS. H. (2019). Efficiency analysis of sugarcane production systems in Thailand using data envelopment analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 238, 117877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117877.
WaramitN. (2012). Developing a bioeconomy in Thailand. Journal for International Society of Southeast Asian Agricultural Sciences, 18(2), 34–44.
40.
WareJ. E.GandekB. (1998). Overview of the SF-36 health survey and the international quality of life assessment (IQOLA) project. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51(11), 903–912, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00081-x
41.
WickhamH.AverickM.BryanJ.ChangW.McGowanL. D.FrançoisR.GrolemundG.HayesA.HenryL.HesterJ.KuhnM.PedersenT. L.MillerE.BacheS. M.MüllerK.OomsJ.RobinsonD.SeidelD. P.SpinuV.YutaniH. (2019). Welcome to the tidyverse. Journal of Open Source Software, 4(43), 1686, https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01686
42.
ZhangX.ZhangX.ChenX. (2017). Happiness in the air: How does a dirty sky affect mental health and subjective well-being?Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 85, 81-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2017.04.001.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
