Governments introduce various policies intending to improve the overall economy or to influence individual behavior. However, estimating the causal impact of these policies is challenging. I describe how the Synthetic Control Method (SCM) can be used in undergraduate econometrics or capstone courses to estimate the impact of economic policies. The SCM is a data-driven design that provides a systematic way of constructing a comparison group that looks very similar to the group implementing the policy. Thus, it allows us to estimate the policy’s impact by comparing the outcome variable’s post-policy path between the policy group and the comparison group. I review a broad range of policies and events that are analyzed using this method, briefly describe the theory behind the method, discuss various best practices, and provide a step-by-step implementation guide using the adoption of a value-added tax (VAT) by France as an example.
AbadieA.DiamondA.HainmuellerJ. (2010). Synthetic control methods for comparative case studies: Estimating the effect of California’s tobacco control program. Journal of the Statistical Association of America, 105(490), 493–505.
2.
AbadieA.DiamondA.HainmuellerJ. (2015). Comparative politics and the synthetic control method. American Journal of Political Science, 59(2), 495–510.
3.
AbadieA.GardeazabalJ. (2003). The economic costs of conflict: A case study of the Basque Country. The American Economic Review, 93(1), 113–132.
4.
AbsherS.GrierK.GrierR. (2020). The economic consequences of durable left-populist regimes in Latin America. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 177(C), 787–817.
5.
AdhikariB. (2020). Does a value-added tax increase economic efficiency?Economic Inquiry, 58(1), 496–517.
6.
AdhikariB.AlmJ. (2013). Did Latvia’s flat tax reform improve growth?. Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Taxation, vol. 106, pp. 1–9. National Tax Association.
7.
AdhikariB.AlmJ. (2016). Evaluating the economic effects of flat tax reforms using synthetic control methods. Southern Economic Journal, 83(2), 437–463.
8.
AdhikariB.DuvalR.HuB.LounganiP. (2018). Can reform waves turn the tide? Some case studies using the synthetic control method. Open Economies Review, 29(4), 879–910.
9.
AkcigitU.BaslandzeS.StantchevaS. (2016). Taxation and the international mobility of inventors. American Economic Review, 106(10), 2930–2981.
10.
AnderssonJ. J. (2019). Carbon taxes and CO2 emissions: Sweden as a case study. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 11(4), 1–30.
11.
AngristJ. D.PischkeJ. (2009). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist’s companion. Princeton University Press.
12.
AngristJ. D.PischkeJ. (2015). Mastering’ metrics: The path from cause to effect. Princeton University Press.
13.
BillmeierA.NanniciniT. (2013). Assessing economic liberalization episodes: A synthetic control approach. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(3), 983–1001.
14.
BornB.DietrichA. M.MüllerG. J. (2021). The lockdown effect: A counterfactual for Sweden. PLOS ONE, 16(4), Article e0249732.
15.
BornB.MüllerG. J.SchularickM.SedláčekP. (2019a). Stable genius? The macroeconomic impact of Trump. CEPR Discussion Papers, 13798.
16.
BornB.MüllerG. J.SchularickM.SedláčekP. (2019b). The costs of economic nationalism: Evidence from the Brexit experiment. Economic Journal, 129(623), 2722–2744.
17.
BreinlichH.LeromainE.NovyD.SampsonT. (2020). Voting with their money: Brexit and outward investment by UK firms. European Economic Review, 124(C), Article 103400.
18.
CamposN. F.CoricelliF.MorettiL. (2015). Norwegian rhapsody?The political economy benefits of regional integration, CEPR Discussion Papers, 10653.
19.
CamposN. F.CoricelliF.MorettiL. (2019). Institutional integration and economic growth in Europe. Journal of Monetary Economics, 103(C), 88–104.
20.
CardD. (1990). The impact of the Mariel Boatlift on the Miami labor market. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 43(2), 245–257.
21.
CavalloE.GalianiS.NoyI.PantanoJ. (2013). Catastrophic natural disasters and economic growth. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(5), 1549–1561.
22.
ChoS. W. (2020). Quantifying the impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions during the COVID-19 outbreak: The case of Sweden. The Econometrics Journal, 23(3), 323–344.
23.
ChuY. L.TownsendW. (2019). Joint culpability: The effects of medical Marijuana laws on crime. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 159(C), 502–525.
24.
CunninghamS. (2021). Causal inference: The mixtape. Yale University Press.
25.
CunninghamS.ShahM. (2018). Decriminalizing indoor prostitution: Implications for sexual violence and public health. Review of Economic Studies, 85(3), 1683–1715.
26.
DonohueJ. J.AnejaA.WeberK. D. (2019). Right-to-carry laws and violent crime: A comprehensive assessment using panel data and a state-level synthetic control analysis. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 16(2), 198–247.
27.
DustmannC.SchönbergU.StuhlerJ. (2017). Labor supply shocks, native wages, and the adjustment of local employment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 132(1), 435–483.
28.
ErenO. E.OzbeklikS. (2016). What do right-to-work laws do? Evidence from a synthetic control method analysis. Journal of Policy Analysis & Management, 35(1), 173–194.
29.
FélixS.PedroP.TavaresA. (2017). Going after the addiction, not the addicted: The impact of drug decriminalization in Portugal. IZA Discussion Papers 10895, Institute of Labor Economics.
30.
FriedsonA. I.McNicholsD.SabiaJ. J.DaveD. (2020). Did California’s Shelter-in-Place order work? Early Coronavirus-related public health effects, NBER Working Papers 26992, National Bureau of Economic Research.
31.
FunkeM.SchularickM.TrebeschC. (2020). Populist leaders and the economy. ECONtribute Discussion Papers Series 036, University of Bonn & University of Cologne.
32.
GrierK.MaynardN. (2016). The economic consequences of Hugo Chavez: A synthetic control analysis. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 125(C), 1–21.
33.
GrossmanD. S.SluskyD. J. G. (2019). The impact of the Flint water crisis on fertility. Demography, 56(6), 2005–2031.
34.
GuettabiM.MunasibA. (2020). Stand your ground laws, homicides and gun deaths. Regional Studies, 52, 1250–1260.
35.
HallJ. C.MattiJ.ZhouY. (2020). The economic impact of city–county consolidations: A synthetic control approach. Public Choice, 184(1), 43–77.
36.
HansenB.MillerK.WeberC. (2020). Early evidence on recreational Marijuana legalization and traffic fatalities. Economic Inquiry, 58(2), 547–568.
37.
JordanM. P.GrossmannM. (2020). The correlates of state policy project (v.2.1). Institute for Public Policy and Social Research (IPPSR).
38.
KaulA.KlößnerS.PfeiferG.SchielerM. (2015). Synthetic control methods: Never use all pre-intervention outcomes together with covariates. MPRA Paper 83790, University Library of Munich.
39.
KlevenH. J.LandaisC.SaezE. (2013). Taxation and international migration of superstars: Evidence from the European football market. American Economic Review, 103(5), 1892–1924.
40.
MaamounN. (2019). The Kyoto protocol: Empirical evidence of a hidden success. Journal of Environmental Economics & Management, 95(C), 227–256.
41.
NanniciniT.BillmeierA. (2011). Economies in transition: How important is trade openness for growth?Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 73(3), 287–314.
42.
PeriG.YasenovV. (2019). The labor market effects of a refugee wave: Synthetic control method meets the Mariel boatlift. Journal of Human Resources, 54(2), 267–309.
43.
PinottiP. (2015). The economic costs of organised crime: Evidence from Southern Italy. Economic Journal, 125(586), 203–232.
44.
PowellB.ClarkJ. R.NowrastehA. (2017). Does mass immigration destroy institutions? 1990s Israel as a natural experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 141(C), 83–95.
45.
PuzzelloL.Gomis-PorquerasP. (2018). Winners and losers from the Euro. European Economic Review, 108(C), 129–152.
46.
RubolinoE.WaldenströmD. (2020). Tax progressivity and top incomes: Evidence from tax reforms. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 18(3), 261–289.
47.
SaiaA. (2017). Choosing the open sea: The cost to the UK of staying out of the Euro. Journal of International Economics, 108(C), 82–98.
48.
Santaella-TenorioJ.Wheeler-MartinK.DiMaggioC. J.Castillo-CarnigliaA.KeyesK. M.HasinD.CerdáM. (2020). Association of recreational Cannabis Laws in Colorado and Washington State with changes in traffic fatalities, 2005-2017. JAMA Internal Medicine, 180(8), 1061–1068.
49.
XiangD.LawleyC. (2019). The impact of British Columbia’s carbon tax on residential natural gas consumption. Energy Economics, 80, 206–218.
