The study uses a projection method to identify maximizing and satisficing individuals in a sample of college students from the Philippines. The study defines a maximizing individual as one who sketches a full glass that is filled up to the brim and a satisficing individual as one who sketches a full glass that is filled below the brim. The study also uses data on school domain satisfaction of the college students. The analysis finds that individuals who maximize also experience lower school domain satisfaction.
BejaE. (2015). The focusing illusion and happiness: Evidence using college basketball championship. Social Indicators Research, 121, 873-885.
2.
BejaE.YapD. (2013). Counting happiness from the individual level to the group level. Social Indicators Research, 114, 621-637.
3.
ChambersD. (1983). Stereotypic images of the scientist: The draw-a-scientist test. Science Education, 67, 255-265.
4.
DienerE.SuhE.LucasR.SmithH. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276-302.
5.
Di TellaR.MacCullochR. (2006). Some uses of happiness data in economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20, 25-46.
6.
GrantA.SchwartzB. (2011). Too much of a good thing: The challenge and opportunity of the inverted U. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 61-76.
7.
IyengarS.WellsR.SchwartzB. (2006). Doing better but feeling worse: Looking for the “best” job undermines satisfaction. Psychological Science, 17, 143-150.
8.
KahnemanD.WakkerP.SarinR. (1997). Back to Bentham? Explorations of experienced utility. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 375-405.
9.
KasserT.RyanR. (1996). Further examining the American dream: Differential correlates of intrinsic and extrinsic goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 280-287.
10.
KearneyK.HyleA. (2004). Drawing out emotions: The use of participant-produced drawings in qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Research, 4, 361-382.
11.
LilienfeldS.WoodJ.GarbH. (2000). The scientific status of projective techniques. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 1, 27-66.
12.
LyubomirskyS.KingL.DienerE. (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success?Psychological Bulletin, 131, 803-855.
13.
MatthewsB. (1996). Drawing scientists. Gender and Education, 8, 231-243.
14.
OishiS.DienerE.LucasR. (2007). The optimum level of well-being: Can people be too happy?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 346-360.
15.
RapaportD. (1967). Principles underlying projective techniques. In GillM. (Ed.), Collected papers of David Rapaport (pp. 91-97). New York, NY: Basic Books.
16.
SchwartzB.WardA. (2004). Doing better but feeling worse: The paradox of choice. In LinleyA.JosephS. (Eds.), Positive psychology in practice (pp. 85-104). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
17.
SchwartzB.WardA.MonterossoJ.LyubomirskyS.WhiteK.LehmanD. (2002). Maximizing versus satisficing: Happiness is a matter of choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1178-1197.
18.
SimonH. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 59, 99-118.
19.
SimonH. (1956). Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review, 63, 129-138.
20.
SundbergN. (1977). Assessment of persons. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
21.
ThomasG.JolleyR. (1998). Drawing conclusions: A re-examination of empirical and conceptual bases for psychological evaluation of children from their drawings. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 37, 127-139.
22.
TuckeyC. (1992). Who is a scientist? Children’s drawings reveal all. Education 3-13: International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education, 20, 30-32.
23.
van PraagB.FrijtersP.Ferrer-i-CarbonellA. (2003). The anatomy of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 51, 29-49.
