From Adam Smith's perspective, the most prominent macroeconomic happening of the post-World War II period was not the Great Moderation, nor was it the recent Great Recession. Instead, it was the secular deceleration in economic growth occurring in the U.S., or the Great Deceleration. Smith's growth theory and his measure of aggregate output are employed in analyzing and documenting this Great Deceleration. From Smith's perspective, the most likely causal forces are the same ones that were retarding economic growth in eighteenth-century England: government command over resources and also its growth-inhibiting policies. On a positive note, Smith would consider the Great Deceleration as reversible.
BlaugM.1978. Economic Theory in Retrospect. 3rd edition. London: Cambridge.
3.
GerdesW.2005. “Smithian Domestic Product and the U.S. Economy.” The Social Science Journal42: 511–522.
4.
GreenwoodJ.1999. “The Third Industrial Revolution: Technology, Productivity, and Income Inequality.” Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland Economic Review35(2): 2–12.
5.
HansenA.1939. “Economic Progress and Declining Population Growth.” American Economic Review29: 1–15.
6.
KeynesJ.M.1971 1923. A Tract on Monetary Reform. London: Macmillan.
7.
KeynesJ.M.1936. The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World.
8.
KrugerA. and SolowR., eds. 2001. The Roaring Nineties: Can Full Employment be Sustained?New York: The Russell Sage Foundation and the Century Foundation.
9.
MillJ.S.1965 1848. Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume IV: Principles of Political Economy with Some of Their Applications to Social Philosophy. Toronto: University of Toronto.
10.
MyintH.1948. Theories of Welfare Economics. Cambridge: Harvard.
11.
RicardoD.1962 (1821, 3rd edition). The Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. London: J.M. Dent & Sons.
12.
SchumpeterJ.1954. History of Economic Analysis. New York: Oxford.
13.
SmithA.1937 1776. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. New York: Random House.
14.
SolowR.1957. “Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function.” Review of Economics and Statistics39: 312–320.
15.
StiglerG.1976. “The Successes and Failures of Professor Smith.” Journal of Political Economy84(6): 1199–1213.
16.
Studenski, p. 1961. The Income of Nations. Part One: History. New York: New York University.
17.
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. 1975. Historical Statistics of the United States: Colonial Times to 1970 (Part 2).
18.
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. Statistical Abstract of the United States (various issues).
19.
U.S. Department of Commerce. 2008, 2009. Bureau of the Census, State and Local Government Finances Summary: 2008 (and 2009).
