This paper contrasts four distinct versions of the Prisoner's Dilemma (the commons, public goods, biological altruism, and biological selfishness) in terms of their ethical content for economic decision making. An argument is made for the restoration of Tucker's third player — as given in the original specification of the game — in order to judge whether a resolution is desirable in economic and business situations that reduce to the Prisoner's Dilemma. Finally, the use of tit-for-tat as a 'solution' to the Prisoner's Dilemma is compared with the practice of business ethics.
AaronH. “The Myth of the Heartless Businessman,” The Wall Street Journal, 7 February, p. A14, 1994.
2.
AndreozziLuciano. “A Note on Paradoxes in Economics,” Kyklos, 57, 1, pp. 3–20, 2004.
3.
ArceDaniel G. “Conspicuous By Its Absence: Ethics and Managerial Economics,” Journal of Business Ethics,54, 3, pp. 259–75, 2004.
4.
ArceDaniel G. “Is Agency Theory Self-Activating?” Economic Inquiry, 45, 4, pp. 708–20, 2007.
5.
ArceDaniel G.; SandlerTodd. “The Dilemma of the Prisoner's Dilemmas,” Kyklos,58, 1, pp. 3–24, 2005.
6.
AxelrodRobert. The Evolution of Cooperation, New York: Basic Books, 1984.
7.
BinmoreKen. Game Theory and the Social Contract I. Playing Fair, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1995.
8.
CampbellGerald M. “Using Game Theory to Introduce Ethics in the Decision Sciences,” Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education,2, 2, pp. 229–234, 2004.
9.
ErikssonRalf. “On the Ethics of Environmental Economics As Seen from Textbooks,” Ecological Economics, 52, pp. 421–35, 2005.
LichbachMark. The Rebel's Dilemma, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 1996.
19.
McDanielWilliam C.; SistrunkFrancis. “Management Dilemmas and Decisions. Impact of Framing and Anticipated Responses,” Journal of Conflict Resolution,35, 1, pp. 21–42, 1991.
20.
NasarSylvia. A Beautiful Mind, NY: Touchstone, 1998.
21.
NashJohn. “Equilibrium Points in N-Person Games,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,36, January, pp. 48–9, 1950.
22.
NorthrupEmily. “Normative Foundations of Introductory Economics,” The American Economist,44, 1, pp. 53–61, 2000.
23.
RapoportAnatol.; ChammahAlbert M.Prisoner's Dilemma: A Study in Conflict and Cooperation, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
24.
RubinsteinAriel. “A Sceptic's Comment on the Study of Economics,” The Economic Journal,116, pp. C1–C9, 2006.
25.
SallyDavid. “Conversation and Cooperation in Social Dilemmas,” Rationality and Society,7, 1, pp. 58–92, 1995.
26.
SandlerTodd. Economic Concepts for the Social Sciences, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
27.
SandlerTodd; ArceDaniel G. “Pure Public Goods versus Commons: Benefit-Cost Duality,” Land Economics,79, 3, pp. 355–68, 2003.
28.
SchellingThomas C.Micromotives and Macro Behavior, NY: Norton, 1978.
29.
SkyrmsBrian. The Stag Hunt and the Evolution of Social Structure, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
30.
SoberElliott; WilsonDavid Sloan. Unto Others. The Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998.
31.
StodderJames. “Experimental Moralities: Ethics in Classroom Experiments,” Journal of Economic Education,29, 2, pp. 127–139, 1998.
32.
TaylorAlan D.Mathematics and Politics, NY: Springer, 1995.
33.
TuckerAlbert. “A Two-Person Dilemma,” Unpublished notes, Stanford, May 1950. Reprinted in Rasmussen, Eric, Ed., Readings in Games and Information, Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 7–8.
34.
VickreyWilliam. “Counterspeculation, Auctions, and Competitive Sealed Tenders,” Journal of Finance,16, pp. 8–37, 1961.
35.
WilsonDavid Sloan. “The Group Selection Controversy: History and Current Status,” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics,14, pp. 159–187, 1983.
