First some reasons are mentioned for using qualitative methods in developmental research. Some features of the qualitative research process are discussed, followed by a short overview of some qualitative methods appropriate to the study of developmental processes - either in parallel using ethnographic methods or retrospectively using methods based on narrative. The episodic interview is briefly presented as an example. It was used in a study of technological change in everyday life in different cultures, which showed how development was changed by new technologies entering the socialization processes. The second topic is the feeling expressed by many parents in these interviews of being overtaken by their children, who acquire computer skills much more quickly and more comprehensively.
Beck, U. (1986) Risikogesellschaft. Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp (Eng. transl. Risk Society, London: Sage, 1992).
2.
Becker, H. S. (1996) “The Epistemology of Qualitative Research”, in R. Jessor, A. Colby and R. A. Shweder (eds) Ethnography and Human Development, pp. 53-72. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
3.
Blumer, H. (1969) Symbolic Interactionism - Perspective and Method. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
4.
Bruckner, P. and Finkielkraut, A. (1981) Das Abenteuer gleich um die Ecke [The Adventure Just Around the Corner]. München: Hanser.
5.
Bruner, J. (1986) Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6.
Bruner, J. (1987) “Life as Narrative”, Social Research54: 11-32.
7.
Bruner, J. (1990) Acts of Meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.
Bruner, J. (1991) “The Narrative Construction of Reality”, Critical Inquiry18: 1-21.
9.
Campbell, D. (1996) “Can We Overcome Worldview Incommensurability/Relativity in Trying to Understand the Other?”, in R. Jessor, A. Colby and R. A. Shweder (eds) Ethnography and Human Development, pp. 153-172. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
10.
Clifford, J. and Marcus, G. E., eds (1986) Writing Culture. The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.
11.
Denzin, N. K. (1996) “The Epistemological Crisis in the Human Disciplines: Letting the Old Do the Work of the New”, in R. Jessor, A. Colby and R. A. Shweder (eds) Ethnography and Human Development, pp. 127-151. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
12.
Dörner, D. (1983) “Empirische Psychologie und Alltagsrelevanz” [Empirical Psychology and Everyday Relevance], in G. Jüttemann (ed.) Psychologie in der Veränderung, pp. 13-29. Weinheim: Beltz.
13.
Duveen, G. (forthcoming) “Piaget Ethnographer”, Social Science Information39 (1).
14.
Flick, U. (1992) “Triangulation Revisited - Strategy of or Alternative to Validation of Qualitative Data”, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour22: 175-197.
15.
Flick, U. (1995) “Stationen des qualitativen Forschungsprozesses” [Stages of the Qualitative Research Process], in U. Flick, E. v. Kardorff, H. Keupp, L. v. Rosenstiel and S. Wolff (eds) Handbuch Qualitative Sozialforschung, 2nd edn, pp. 148-175. München: Psychologie Verlags Union.
16.
Flick, U. (1996) Psychologie des technisierten Alltags - Soziale Konstruktion und Repräsentation technischen Wandels in verschiedenen kulturellen Kontexten [Psychology of Mechanized Everyday Life - Social Construction and Representation of Technological Change in Different Cultural Contexts]. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
17.
Flick, U. (1998) An Introduction to Qualitative Research. London: Sage.
18.
Geertz, C. (1983) Local Knowledge. Further Essays in Interpretative Anthropology. New York: Basic Books.
19.
Geertz, C. (1996) Welt in Stücken - Kultur und Politik am Ende des 20. Jahrhunderts [World in Pieces - Culture and Politics at the End of the 20th Century]. Wien: Passagen.
20.
Geertz, C. (1997) “Learning with Bruner. Review of Jerome Bruner: The Culture of Education”, New York Review of Books, 10 April: 21-26.
21.
Gergen, K. J. and Gergen, M. M. (1986) “Narrative Form and the Construction of Psychological Science”, in T. R. Sarbin (ed.) Narrative Psychology, pp. 22-44. New York: Praeger.
22.
Glaser, B. G. and Strauss, A. L. (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Aldine.
23.
Habermas, J. (1985) Die neue Unübersichtlichkeit [The New Obscurity]. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp (Eng. transl. in The Habermas Reader, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1996).
24.
Harré, R. (1998) “The Epistemology of Social Representations”, in U. Flick (ed.) Psychology of the Social, pp. 129-137. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25.
Hermanns, H. (1995) “Narratives Interview”, in U. Flick, E. v. Kardorff, H. Keupp, L. v. Rosenstiel and S. Wolff (eds) Handbuch Qualitative Sozialforschung, 2nd edn, pp. 182-185. München: Psychologie Verlags Union.
26.
Hildenbrand, B. (1999) Fallrekonstruktive Familienforschung [Case-reconstructive Family Research]. Opladen: Leske and Budrich.
27.
Hradil, S. , ed. (1992) Zwischen Bewußtsein und Sein [Between Consciousness and Being]. Opladen: Leske and Budrich
28.
Jessor, R. , Colby, A. and Shweder, R. A., eds (1996) Ethnography and Human Development. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
29.
Kalthoff, H. (1997) “Fremdenrepräsentation. Über ethnographisches Arbeiten in exklusiven Internatsschulen” [Strangers' Representation. On Ethnographic Work in Exclusive Boarding Schools], in S. Hirschauer and K. Amann (eds) Die Befremdung der eigenen Kultur, pp. 240-266. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.
30.
Kelle, H. (1997) “Wir und die Anderen. Die interaktive Herstellung von Schulklassen durch Kinder” [Us and Them. The Interactive Construction of School Classes by Children], in S. Hirschauer and K. Amann (eds) Die Befremdung der eigenen Kultur, p. 138-166. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.
31.
Lloyd, B. and Duveen, G. M. (1992) Gender Identities and Education. The Impact of Starting School. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester/Wheatsheaf.
32.
Moscovici, S. (1984) “The Phenomenon of Social Representations”, in R. M. Farr and S. Moscovici (eds) Social Representations, pp. 3-69. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33.
Neisser, U. (1981) “John Dean's Memory: A Case Study”, Cognition9: 1-22.
34.
Neubauer, G. and Hurrelmann, K., eds (1995) Individualization in Childhood and Adolescence. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter.
35.
O'Connell, D. and Kowal, S. (1995) “Basic Principles of Transcription”, in J. Smith, R. Harré and L. v. Langenhove (eds) Rethinking Methods in Psychology, pp. 93-104. London: Sage.
36.
Oerter, R. (1999) “The Measurement of Cognitive Structures: A Constructivist Approach”, Social Science Information38 (4): 659-681.
37.
Ragin, C. C. and Becker, H. S., eds (1992) What is a Case? Exploring the Foundations of Social Inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38.
Ricoeur, P. (1981) “Mimesis and Representation”, Annals of Scholarship2: 15-32.
39.
Sarbin, T. R. , ed. (1986) Narrative Psychology - The Storied Nature of Human Conduct. New York: Praeger.
40.
Schütze, F. (1977) “Die Technik des narrativen Interviews in Interaktionsfeldstudien, dargestellt an einem Projekt zur Erforschung von kommunalen Machtstrukturen” [The Technique of the Narrative Interview in Interactive Field Studies], presented for a project on local power structures, Bielefeld University, Faculty of Sociology (manuscript).
41.
Spradley, J. P. (1979) The Ethnographic Interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
42.
Steinke, I. (1999) Kriterien für die Bewertung qualitativer Forschung [Criteria for Assessing Qualitative Research]. Munich and Weinheim: Juventa.
43.
Treumann, K. P. and Volkmer, I. (1995) “The `Mediatization' of Childhood”, in G. Neubauer and K. Hurrelmann (eds) Individualization in Childhood and Adolescence, pp. 321-348. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter.
44.
Tulving, E. (1972) “Episodic and Semantic Memory”, in E. Tulving and W. Donaldson (eds) Organization of Memory, pp. 381-403. New York: Academic Press.
45.
Weissner, T. S. (1996) “Why Ethnography Should Be the Most Important Method in the Study of Human Development”, in R. Jessor, A. Colby and R. A. Shweder (eds) Ethnography and Human Development, pp. 305-325. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
