Is the European Monetary System converging to integration?

Abstract

The emerging system at the European level can be conceptualized as a pattern of relations among member states that tends to be reproduced despite disturbances in individual trajectories. The Markov property is used as an indicator of systemness in the distribution. The individual trajectories of nations participating in the European Monetary System are assessed using an information theoretical model that is consistent with the Markov property in the multivariate case. Economic and monetary integration are analysed using independent data sets. Increasing integration can be retrieved in both of these dimensions, notably since the currency crises of 1992 and 1993. However, the dynamics for countries which have strongly coupled their currency to the German Mark are different from those which did not. Additionally, developments in inflation and exchange rates at the European level are assessed in relation to global developments.

Keywords

Euro Emergence Monetary system Probabilistic entropy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baillie, R. T. and Selover, D. D. (1987) “Cointegration and Models of Exchange Rate Determination”, International Journal of Forecasting 3: 43-51.

Banerjee, A. , Dolado, J. , Galbraith, J. W. and Hendry, D. F. (1993) Co-Integration, Error-Correction, and the Econometric Analysis of Non-Stationary Data. New York: Oxford University Press.

Bofinger, P. (1994) “Is Europe an Optimum Currency Area?”, in A. Steinherr (ed.) 30 Years of European Monetary Integration. From the Werner Plan to EMU, pp. 38-56. London: Longman.

Cheung, Yin-Wong , Fung, Hung-Gay , Lai, Kon S. and Lo, Wai-Chung (1995) “Purchasing Power Parity under the European Monetary System”, Journal of International Money and Finance 14 (2): 179-189.

Collignon, S. (1994) Europe's Monetary Future. A Study Prepared at the Request of the European Parliament. Cranbury, NJ: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press and Edinburgh: Rutherford.

Council of the European Communities and Commission of the European Communities (1992) Treaty on European Union. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

De Grauwe, P. (1996) “The Economics of Convergence: Towards Monetary Union in Europe”, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 132 (1): 1-27.

Dutt, S. D. and Ghosh, D. (1995) “Purchasing Power Parity Doctrine: Weak and Strong Form Tests”, Applied Economic Letters 2: 316-320.

Eichengreen, B. (1991) Is Europe an Optimum Currency Area? NBER Research Working Paper No 3579. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

10.

Giovannini, A. (1994) “The Debate on Nominal Convergence Before and After the 1992 Crisis”, in A. Steinherr (ed.) 30 Years of European Monetary Integration. From the Werner Plan to EMU, pp. 184-191. London: Longman.

11.

Heylen, F. , Van Poeck, A. and Van Gompel, J. (1995) “Real versus Nominal Convergence: National Labour Markets and the European Integration Process”, Labour 9 (1): 97-119.

12.

IMF (1981) International Financial Statistics, Supplement on Exchange Rates, Supplement Series No 1. Washington, DC: IMF.

13.

IMF (1997) International Financial Statistics, Vol. L, No 5, May. Washington, DC: IMF.

14.

Krippendorff, K. (1986) Information Theory: Structural Models for Qualitative Data. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

15.

Leydesdorff, L. (1991) “The Static and Dynamic Analysis of Network Data Using Information Theory”, Social Networks 13: 301-345.

16.

Leydesdorff, L. (1995) The Challenge of Scientometrics: The Development, Measurement, and Self-organization of Scientific Communications. Leiden: DSWO Press Leiden University.

17.

McCloskey, D. N. (1985) “The Loss Function Has Been Mislaid: the Rhetoric of Significance Tests”, American Economic Review 75 (2): 201-205.

18.

Mill, J. S. (1909) Principles of Political Economy with Some of their Applications to Social Philosophy, ed. Sir William Ashley . London: Longman, Green. (Originally published 1848).

19.

Mundell, R. (1961) “A Theory of Optimum Currency Areas”, American Economic Review 51: 657-665.

20.

OECD (1996) OECD Economic Outlook, No 60, December. Paris: OECD.

21.

Shannon, C. E. (1948) “A Mathematical Theory of Communication”, Bell System Technical Journal 27: 379-423, 623-656.

22.

Theil, H. (1966) Applied Economic Forecasting. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

23.

Theil, H. (1967) Economics and Information Theory. New York: American Elsevier and Amsterdam: North-Holland.

24.

Theil, H. (1972) Statistical Decomposition Analysis. Amsterdam: North-Holland.