Although the textualist critique of ethnography has challenged the possibility of science in cultural anthropology, insights provided by that critique are crucial for the further development of a scientific approach in the discipline. The value of the textualist critique of ethnography for the development of scientific ethnology can best be seen through an analogy with archaeology. Just as archaeologists' ability to reconstruct the past has been enhanced, not undermined, by a detailed understanding of archaeological site formation processes, so can ethnologists' ability to understand patterns within and among human societies be enhanced through a better understanding of ethnographic text formation processes. Key elements of the textualist critique of ethnography, including an emphasis on reflexivity, multivocality, and the process of writing ethnography, are great aids in the elucidation of ethnographic text formation processes.
Aberle, D.F. (1987) “Distinguished Lecture: What Kind of Science is Anthropology?”, American Anthropologist89(3): 551-566.
2.
Anderson, M. (1986) “Cultural Concatenation of Deceit and Secrecy”, in R.W. Mitchell and N.S. Thompson (eds) Deception: Perspectives on Human and Nonhuman Deceit, pp. 323-348. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
3.
Ascher, R. (1968) “Time's Arrow and the Archaeology of a Contemporary Community”, in K.C. Chang (ed.) Settlement Archaeology, pp. 43-52. Palo Alto, CA: National Press Books.
4.
Aunger, R. (1994) “Sources of Variation in Ethnographic Interview Data: Food Avoidances in the Ituri Forest, Zaire”, Ethnology33: 65-99.
5.
Aunger, R. (1995) “On Ethnography: Storytelling or Science?”, Current Anthropology36(1): 97-130.
6.
Bailey, F.G. (1991) The Prevalence of Deceit. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
7.
Barthes, R. (1982) “Authors and Writers”, in S.Sontag (ed.) A Barthes Reader, pp. 185-193. New York: Hill and Wang.
8.
Bateson, G. (1958 [1936]) Naven: A Survey of the Problems Suggested by a Composite Picture of the Culture of a New Guinea Tribe Drawn from Three Points of View, 2nd edn.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
9.
Bernard, H.R. , Killworth, P., Kronenfeld, D. and Sailer, L. (1984) “The Problem of Informant Accuracy: The Validity of Retrospective Data”, Annual Review of Anthropology13: 495-517.
10.
Berreman, G.D. (1968) “Ethnography: Method and Product”, in J. A. Clifton (ed.) Introduction to Cultural Anthropology, pp. 336-373. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
11.
Bilmes, J. (1975) “Misinformation and Ambiguity in Verbal Interaction: A Northern Thai Example”, International Journal of the Sociology of Language2: 63-75.
12.
Binford, L. (1978) Nunamiut Ethnoarchaeology. New York: Academic Press.
13.
Binford, L. (1981) “Behavioral Archaeology and the Pompeii Premise”, Journal of Anthropological Research37: 195-208.
14.
Binford, L. (1983) In Pursuit of the Past: Decoding the Archaeological Record. New York: Thames and Hudson.
15.
Bleek, W. (1987) “Lying Informants: A Fieldwork Experience from Ghana”, Population and Development Review13: 314-322.
16.
Bond, G.C. (1990) “Fieldnotes: Research in Past Occurrences”, in R. Sanjek (ed.) Fieldnotes: The Makings of Anthropology, pp. 273-289. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
17.
Briggs, C. L. (1986) Learning How to Ask: A Sociolinguistic Appraisal of the Role of the Interview in Social Science Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
Campbell, D.T. (1970) “Natural Selection as an Epistemological Model”, in R. Naroll and R. Cohen (eds) A Handbook of Method in Cultural Anthropology, pp. 51-85. Garden City, NY: Natural History Press.
19.
Cancian, F. A. (1975) What Are Norms? A Study of Beliefs and Action in a Maya Community. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20.
Carrithers, M. (1990) “Is Anthropology Art or Science?”, Current Anthropology31(3): 263-282.
21.
Chagnon, N. A. (1974) Studying the Yanomamö. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
22.
Chagnon, N. A. (1992) Yanomamö, 4th edn.Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.
23.
Chen, K.-H. and Murray, G.F. (1976) “Truths and Untruths in Village Haiti: An Experiment in Third World Survey Research”, in J.F. Marshall and S. Polgar (eds) Culture, Natality, and Family Planning, pp. 241-262. Chapel Hill, NC: Carolina Population Center.
24.
Clifford, J. (1986) “Introduction: Partial Truths”, in J. Clifford and G.E.Marcus (eds) Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography, pp. 1-26. Berkeley: University of California Press.
25.
Clifford, J. (1988) The Predicament of Culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26.
Clifford, J. and Marcus, G.E., eds (1986) Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.
27.
Collins, M. B. (1975) “The Sources of Bias in Processual Data: An Appraisal”, in J.W. Mueller (ed.) Sampling in Archaeology, pp. 26-32. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
28.
Condominas, G. (1957) We Have Eaten the Forest: The Story of a Montagnard Village in the Central Highlands of Vietnam, tr. Adrienne Foulke. New York: Hill and Wang.
29.
Condran, J.G. and Bode, J.G. (1982) “Rashomon, Working Wives, and Family Division of Labor: Middletown, 1980”, Journal of Marriage and the Family44(2): 421-426.
30.
Cowgill, G. L. (1970) “Some Sampling and Reliability Problems in Archaeology”, in Colloques Internationaux du Centre National de la Récherche Scientifique Archéologie et calculateurs: Problèmes sémiologiques et mathématiques, pp. 161-175. Paris: Editions du Centre National de la Récherche Scientifique.
31.
Crane, G. (1991) “Composing Culture: The Authority of an Electronic Text”, Current Anthropology32(3): 293-311.
32.
Crapanzano, V. (1980) Tuhami: Portrait of a Moroccan. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
33.
Crissman, J.K. , Iaccino, J.F. and Jelen, T.G. (1989) “The Relationship of Aging to Perceptions of the Performance of Household Chores”, Journal of Social Behavior and Personality4: 471-480.
34.
Cronk, L. (1991) “Intention vs. Behaviour in Parental Sex Preferences Among the Mukogodo of Kenya”, Journal of Biosocial Science23: 229-240.
35.
Dauber, K. (1995) “Bureaucratizing the Ethnographer's Magic”, Current Anthropology36(1): 75-95.
36.
Dean, J.P. and Whyte, W.F. (1958) “How do you Know if the Informant is Telling the Truth?”, Human Organization17: 34-38.
37.
Deutscher, I. , ed. (1973) What We Say/What We Do: Sentiments and Acts. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
38.
Dickson, D.B. (1993) Ancient Preludes: World Prehistory from the Perspectives of Archaeology, Geology, and Paleoecology. Minneapolis, MN: West.
39.
Divale, W.T. (1976) “Female Status and Cultural Evolution: A Study in Ethnographer Bias”, Behavior Science Research11: 169-211.
40.
Dunnell, R.C. (1990) “Formation-Process Studies and Everyday Archaeological Practice”, Current Anthropology31(2): 223-224.
41.
Foucault, M. (1979) “What is an Author?”, in J.V. Harari (ed.) Textual Strategies: Perspectives in Post-Structuralist Criticism, pp. 141-160. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
42.
Frankel, B. (n.d.) “Two Rashomon Effects and a Puzzled Ethnographer: On the Epistemology of Listening to Different Voices”, available from the author (Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Lehigh University, 681 Taylor Street, Bethlehem, PA 18015, USA).
43.
Freeman, D. (1983) Margaret Mead and Samoa. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
44.
Freeman, L.C. and Romney, K. (1987) “Words, Deeds, and Social Structure: A Preliminary Study of the Reliability of Informants”, Human Organization46(4): 330-334.
45.
Freilich, M. (1970) “Toward a Formalization of Fieldwork”, in M. Freilich (ed.) Marginal Natives: Anthropologists at Work, pp. 485-594. New York: Harper and Row.
46.
Geertz, C. (1988) Works and Lives: The Anthropologist as Author. Oxford: Polity Press.
47.
Gilsenan, M. (1976) “Lying, Honor, and Contradiction”, in B. Kapferer (ed.) Transaction and Meaning: Directions in the Anthropology of Exchange and Symbolic Behavior, pp. 191-219. Philadelphia, PA: Institute for the Study of Human Issues.
48.
Gould, R.A. (1980) Living Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
49.
Hacking, I. (1983) Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
50.
Hammersley, M. (1992) What's Wrong with Ethnography?: Methodological Explorations. London: Routledge.
51.
Hastrup, K. (1992) “Writing Ethnography: State of the Art”, in J. Okely and H. Call-away (eds) Anthropology and Autobiography, pp. 116-133. London: Routledge.
52.
Hayek, F.A. (1955) The Counter-Revolution of Science: Studies on the Abuse of Reason. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
53.
Heider, K.G. (1988) “The Rashomon Effect: When Ethnographers Disagree”, American Anthropologist90: 73-81.
54.
Hodder, I. (1991) Reading the Past: Current Approaches to Interpretation in Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55.
Hrdy, S.B. (1990) “Sex Bias in Nature and in History: A Late 1980s Reexamination of the `Biological Origins' Argument”, Yearbook of Physical Anthropology33: 25-37.
56.
Hyman, H.H. (1954) Interviewing in Social Research. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
57.
Johnson, A. and Johnson, O. (1989) Machiguenga Time Allocation Data Base. Cross-Cultural Studies in Time Allocation. New Haven, CT: HRAF Press.
58.
Kluckhohn, C. (1944) Navajo Witchcraft. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
59.
Krieger, S. (1983) The Mirror Dance: Identity in a Women's Community. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
60.
Kroeber, A. (1963) An Anthropologist Looks at History. Berkeley: University of California Press.
61.
Kuhn, T.S. (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
62.
Kuper, A. (1993) “Post-Modernism, Cambridge and the Great Kalahari Debate”, Social Anthropology1: 57-71.
63.
Leach, E.R. (1954) Political Systems of Highland Burma: A Study of Kachin Social Structure. London: Athlone.
64.
Lemaire, T. (1991) “Anthropological Doubt”, in L. Nencel and P. Pels (eds) Constructing Knowledge: Authority and Critique in Social Science, pp. 22-39. London: Sage.
65.
Lizot, J. (1985) Tales of the Yanomami: Daily Life in the Venezuelan Forest. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
66.
Marcus, G.E. , and Cushman, D. (1982) “Ethnographies as Texts”, Annual Review of Anthropology11: 25-69.
67.
Marcus, G.E. and Fischer, M.M.J. (1986) Anthropology as Cultural Critique: An Experimental Moment in the Human Sciences. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
68.
McNabb, S.L. (1990) “The Uses of `Inaccurate' Data: A Methodological Critique and Applications of Alaska Native Data”, American Anthropologist92(1): 116-129.
69.
Mead, M. (1977) Letters from the Field, 1925-1975. New York: Harper and Row.
70.
Mishler, E.G. (1986) Research Interviewing: Context and Narrative. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
71.
Montandon, C. (1981) “Deception of Host and Self in Field Work: A Case Study”, Wisconsin Sociologist21: 118-127.
72.
Nachman, S.R. (1984) “Lies My Informants Told Me”, Journal of Anthropological Research40: 536-555.
73.
Naroll, R. (1962) Data Quality Control. New York: Free Press.
74.
Naroll, R. (1970) “Data Quality Control in Cross-Cultural Surveys”, in R. Naroll and R. Cohen (eds) A Handbook of Method in Cultural Anthropology, pp. 927-945. Garden City, NY: Natural History Press.
75.
Okely, J. and Callaway, H., eds (1992) Anthropology and Autobiography. London: Routledge.
76.
Ottenberg, S. (1990) “Thirty Years of Fieldnotes: Changing Relationships to the Text”, in R. Sanjek (ed.) Fieldnotes: The Makings of Anthropology, pp. 139-160. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
77.
Passin, H. (1942) “Tarahumara Prevarication: A Problem in Field Method”, American Anthropologist44: 235-247.
78.
Pelto, P. and Pelto, G. (1975) “Intra-Cultural Diversity: Some Theoretical Issues”, American Ethnologist2(1): 1-18.
79.
Pool, R. (1991) “ `Oh, Research, Very Good!': On Fieldwork and Representation”, in L. Nencel and P. Pels (eds) Constructing Knowledge: Authority and Critique in Social Science, pp. 59-77. London: Sage.
80.
Popper, K. (1959) The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Basic Books.
81.
Pratt, M.L. (1986) “Fieldwork in Common Places”, in J. Clifford and G.E. Marcus (eds) Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography, pp. 27-50. Berkeley: University of California Press.
82.
Rabinow, P. (1977) Reflections on Fieldwork in Morocco. Berkeley: University of California Press.
83.
Rohner, R.P. , Dewalt, B.R. and Ness, R.C. (1973) “Ethnographer Bias in Cross-Cultural Research: An Empirical Study”, Behavior Science Notes8: 275-317.
84.
Rohner, R.P. , Berg, D.S. and Rohner, E.C. (1982) “Data Quality Control in the Standard Cross-Cultural Sample”, Ethnology21: 359-369.
85.
Rosenthal, R. (1976) Experimenter Effects in Behavioral Research. New York: Irvington.
86.
Salamone, F.A. (1977) “The Methodological Significance of the Lying Informant”, Anthropological Quarterly50: 117-124.
87.
Sanjek, R. , ed. (1990a) Fieldnotes: The Makings of Anthropology. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
88.
Sanjek, R. (1990b) “On Ethnographic Validity”, in R. Sanjek (ed.) Fieldnotes: The Makings of Anthropology, pp. 385-418. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
89.
Schiffer, M.B. (1976) Behavioral Archaeology. New York: Academic Press.
90.
Schiffer, M.B. (1987) Formation Processes of the Archaeological Record. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press.
91.
Scott, J.C. (1985) Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
92.
Scott, J.C. (1990) Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
93.
Silverman, M.G. (1972) “Ambiguation and Disambiguation in Field Work”, in S.T. Kimball and J. B. Watson (eds) Crossing Cultural Boundaries: The Anthropological Experience, pp. 204-229. San Francisco, CA: Chandler.
94.
Sperber, D. (1985) On Anthropological Knowledge: Three Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
95.
Tilley, C. (1993) “Introduction: Interpretation and a Poetics of the Past”, in C. Tilley (ed.) Interpretative Archaeology, pp. 1-27. Providence, RI: Berg.
96.
Tyler, S.A. (1986) “Post-Modern Ethnography: From Document of the Occult to Occult Document”, in J. Clifford and G.E. Marcus (eds) Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography, pp. 122-140. Berkeley: University of California Press.
97.
Van Maanen, J. (1988) Tales of the Field: On Writing Ethnography. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
98.
Vayda, A.P. (1994) “Actions, Variations, and Change: The Emerging Anti-Essentialist View in Anthropology”, in R. Borofsky (ed.) Assessing Cultural Anthropology, pp. 320-329. New York: McGraw-Hill.
99.
Waters, M. (1992) Principles of Geoarchaeology: A North American Perspective. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
100.
Weingrod, A. (1981) “Rashomon in Jerusalem: Ideology and Power in an Urban Dispute”, Archives Européennes de Sociologie22: 158-169.
101.
Werner, O. and Schoepfle, G.M. (1987) Systematic Fieldwork. Volume 1: Foundations of Ethnography and Interviewing. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
102.
Wolf, M. (1992) A Thrice-Told Tale: Feminism, Postmodernism, and Ethnographic Responsibility. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
