Open access to research data has become an issue in many contemporary sciences. One of them is Historical Climatology, a discipline drawing on archival materials to study the climate’s past. Based on fieldwork, the article explores the construction of a shared database by a group of historical climatologists and describes the strategies and hopes built into that infrastructure. I examine how the possession and provision of data relate to issues of recognition and legitimacy, thereby turning database construction into a practice of social import. Further, I argue that taking into account the diversity of research materials from which climate data is constituted – historical documents, tree-rings, ice-cores, etc. – is crucial for apprehending both the status of distinct types of data and the status of distinct research groups in the scientific field under investigation here.
ArzbergerPSchroederPBeaulieuAet al. (2004) An international framework to promote access to data. Science303(5665): 1777–1778.
2.
AsdalKMoserI (2012) Experiments in context and contexting. Science, Technology & Human Values37(4): 291–306.
3.
BakerKMillerandF (2010) Infrastructuring ecology: Challenges in achieving data sharing. In: ParkerJVermeulenN. (eds) Collaboration in the New Life Science. Surrey: Ashgate, 111–138.
4.
BontemsVGingrasY (2007) De la science normale à la science marginale. Analyse d’une bifurcation de trajectoire scientifique: le cas de la Théorie de la Relativité d’Echelle. Social Science Information46(4): 607–653.
5.
BorgmanC (2007) Scholarship in the digital age: Information, infrastructure, and the Internet. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6.
BourdieuP (1975) The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason. Social Science Information14(6): 19–47.
7.
BourdieuP (1984) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London: Routledge.
8.
BourdieuP (1986) The forms of capital. In: RichardsonJ (ed.) Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, New York: Greenwood, 241–258.
9.
BourdieuP (2004) Science of Science and Reflexivity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
10.
BowkerG (2000) Biodiversity datadiversity. Social Studies of Science30(5): 643–683.
11.
BowkerG (2013) Data flakes: An afterword. In: GitelmanL (ed.) Raw Data is an Oxymoron. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 167–171.
12.
BradleyR (2015) Paleoclimatology: Reconstructing Climates of the Quaternary. Kidlington: Academic Press.
13.
BrázdilRPfisterCWannerHvon StorchHLuterbacherJ (2005) Historical climatology in Europe – the state of the art. Climatic Change70(3): 363–430.
14.
BüntgenUTegelWCarrerMet al. (2015) Commentary to Wetter et al. (2014): Limited tree-ring evidence for a 1540 European ‘megadrought’. Climatic Change131(2): 183–190.
15.
BurriV (2008) Doing distinctions: Boundary work and symbolic capital in radiology. Social Studies of Science38(1): 35–62.
16.
CallonM (1984) Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. The Sociological Review32(1): 196–233.
17.
CamicC (2011) Bourdieu’s cleft sociology of science. Minerva49(3): 275–293.
18.
CareyM (2012) Climate and history: A critical review of historical climatology and climate change historiography. WIREs Climate Change3(3): 233–249.
19.
EdwardsP (2010) A Vast Machine: Computer models, climate data, and the politics of global warming. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
FleckL (1979[1935]) Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact, trans. BradleyFTrennT. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
22.
GierynT (1983) Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review48(6): 781–795.
23.
GingrasY (2013) Sociologie des sciences. Paris: PUF.
24.
GitelmanL (2014) Paper Knowledge: Towards a media history of documents. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
25.
GlaserR (1996) Data and methods of climatological evaluation in Historical Climatology. Historical Social Research21(4): 56–88.
GlaserRMilitzerS (1993) Wetter-Witterung-Umwelt: Aufzeichnungen und Daten aus Franken, Sachsen, Sachsen-Anhalt und Thüringen 1500–1699. Würzburg: Geographisches Institut der Universität Würzburg.
28.
GlaserRRiemannD (2009) A thousand-year record of temperature variations for Germany and Central Europe based on documentary data. Journal of Quaternary Science24(5): 437–449.
29.
GlaserRRiemannDSchönbeinJet al. (2010). The variability of European floods since AD 1500. Climatic Change101(1–2): 235–256.
30.
HeatonLMillerandF (2013) La mise en base de données de matériaux de recherche en botanique et en écologie. Spécimens, données et métadonnées. Revue d’anthropologie des connaissances7(4): 885–913.
31.
HimmelsbachIGlaserRSchönbeinJet al. (2015) Reconstruction of flood events based on documentary data and transnational flood risk analysis of the upper Rhine and its French and German tributaries since AD 1480. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences19: 4149–4164.
32.
HineC (2006) Databases as scientific instruments and their role in the ordering of scientific work. Social Studies of Science36(2): 269–298.
33.
HongW (2008) Domination in a scientific field: Capital struggle in a Chinese isotope lab. Social Studies of Science38(4): 543–70.
34.
KimK (2009) What would a Bourdieuan sociology of scientific truth look like?Social Science Information48(1): 57–79.
35.
KohlerR (1993) Drosophila: A life in the laboratory. Journal of the History of Biology26(2): 281–310.
36.
KohlerR (1994) Lords of the Fly. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
37.
KrämerD (2015) ‘Menschen grasten nun mit dem Vieh’: Die letzte grosse Hungerskrise der Schweiz 1816/17. Basel: Schwabe.
38.
LambH (1977) Climate: Present, Past and Future (2 vols). London: Methuen.
39.
Le Roy LadurieE (1971) Times of Feast, Times of Famine: A history of climate since the year 1000. Garden City: Doubleday.
40.
LeonelliS (2012) When humans are the exception: Cross-species databases at the interface of biological and clinical research. Social Studies of Science42(2): 214–236.
41.
LeonelliS (2013) Why the current insistence on open access to scientific data? Big data, knowledge production, and the political economy of contemporary biology. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society33(1–2): 6–11.
42.
LeonelliS (2016) Data-centric Biology: A philosophical study. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
43.
LevinNLeonelliS (2017) How does one ‘open’ science? Questions of value in biological research. Science, Technology & Human Values42(2): 280–305.
44.
MainbergerS (1995) Schriftskepsis: Von Philosophen, Mönchen, Buchhaltern, Kalligraphen. München: Fink.
45.
MertonR (1973[1942]) The normative structure of science. In: StorerN (ed.) The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 267–278.
46.
MichenerW (2015) Ecological data sharing. Ecological Informatics29: 33–44.
47.
MillerandF (2011) Le partage des données scientifiques à l’ère de l’e-science: l’instrumentation des pratiques au sein d’un collectif multidisciplinaire. Terrains & travaux18(1): 215–237.
48.
MillerandF (2012) La science en réseau. Les gestionnaires d’information ‘invisibles’ dans la production d’une base de données scientifiques. Revue d’anthropologie des connaissances6(1): 163–190.
49.
NadimT (2016) Data labours: How the sequence databases GenBank and EMBL-Bank make data. Science as Culture25(4): 496–519.
50.
Nature (2016) Announcement: Where are the data?Nature537(7619): 138.
PanofskyA (2011) Field analysis and interdisciplinary science: Scientific capital exchange in behavior genetics. Minerva49(3): 295–316.
53.
PfisterC (1985) Klimageschichte der Schweiz 1525–1860. Das Klima der Schweiz von 1525–1860 und seine Bedeutung in der Geschichte von Bevölkerung und Landwirtschaft. Bern: Haupt.
54.
PfisterCWetterOBrázdilRet al. (2015) Tree-rings and people – different views on the 1540 Megadrought. Reply to Büntgen et al. 2015. Climatic Change131(2): 191–198.
55.
PontilleD (2010) Updating a biomedical database: Writing, reading and invisible communication. In: BartonDPapenU (eds) The Anthropology of Writing: Understanding textually mediated worlds. London: Continuum, 47–66.
56.
Ramírez-i-OlléM (2015) Rhetorical strategies for scientific authority: A boundary-work analysis of ‘Climategate’. Science as Culture24(4): 384–411.
57.
RheinbergerH-J (1997) Towards a History of Epistemic Things: Synthesizing proteins in the test tube. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
58.
RibesDFinholtT (2009) The Long Now of Technology Infrastructure: Articulating tensions in development. Journal of the Association for Information Systems10(5): 375–398.
59.
RiemannD (2012) Methoden zur Klimarekonstruktion aus historischen Quellen am Beispiel Mitteleuropas. Freiburg i. Br.: Universität Freiburg.
60.
RiemannDGlaserRKahleMVogtS (2015) The CRE tambora.org – new data and tools for collaborative research in climate and environmental history. Geoscience Data Journal2(2): 63–77.
SchinkelW (2016) Making climates comparable: Comparison in paleoclimatology. Social Studies of Science43(3): 374–395.
63.
SismondoS (2011) Bourdieu’s rationalist science of science: Some promises and limitations. Cultural Sociology5(1): 83–97.
64.
StarSGriesemerJ (1989) Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science19(3): 387–420.
65.
StarSRuhlederK (1996) Steps toward an ecology of infrastructure: Design and access for large information spaces. Information Systems Research7(1): 111–134.
66.
StarSStraussA (1999) Layers of silence, arenas of voice: The ecology of visible and invisible work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work8: 9–30.
67.
StrasserB (2012) Data-driven sciences: From wonder cabinets to electronic databases. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences43(1): 85–87.
68.
WetterOPfisterCWernerJPet al. (2014) The year-long unprecedented European heat and drought of 1540 – a worst case. Climatic Change125(3–4): 349–363.
69.
ZimmermanA (2008) New knowledge from old data: The role of standards in the sharing and reuse of ecological data. Science, Technology, & Human Values33(5): 631–652.
