The role of the natural world in the theory choice of scientists

Barnes, B. (1981) “On the Conventional Character of Knowledge and Cognition”, Philosophy of the Social Sciences 11: 303-333.

Barnes, B. (1982) T.S. Kuhn and Social Science. New York: Columbia University Press.

Barnes, B. and Shapin, S. (1979) Natural Order: Historical Studies of Scientific Culture. Beverly Hills and London: Sage.

Bloor, D. (1975) “Epistemology or Psychology?”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 5: 382-395.

Bloor, D. (1982) “Durkheim and Mauss Revisited: Classification and the Sociology of Knowledge”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 13: 267-297.

Bloor, D. (1983) Wittgenstein: A Social Theory of Knowledge. New York: Columbia University Press.

Bloor, D. (1984) “Reply to J.W. Smith”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 15: 245-249.

Bloor, D. (1989) “Professor Campbell on Models of Language-Learning and the Sociology of Science: A Reply”, in S. Fuller , M. DeMey , T. Shinn and S. Woolgar (eds) The Cognitive Turn: Sociological and Psychological Perspectives on Science, pp. 159-165. Dordrecht: Reidel.

Campbell, D.T. (1973) “Ostensive Instances and Entitativity in Language Learning”, in W. Gray and N.D. Rizzo (eds) Unity Through Diversity: A Festschrift for Ludwig von Bertalanffy, pp. 1043-1057. New York: Gordon and Breach.

Campbell, D.T. (1986) “Science's Social System of Validity-Enhancing Collective Belief Change and the Problems of the Social Sciences”, in D.W. Fiske and R.A. Shweder (eds) Metatheory in Social Science: Pluralism and Subjectivities, pp. 108-135. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Campbell, D.T. (1989) “Models of Language Learning and Their Implications for Social Constructionist Analyses of Scientific Belief”, in S. Fuller , M. DeMey , T. Shinn and S. Woolgar (eds) The Cognitive Turn: Sociological and Psychological Perspectives on Science, pp. 153-158. Dordrecht: Reidel.

Churchill, F.B. (1975) “William Johannsen and the Genotype Concept”, Journal of the History of Biology 7: 5-30.

Cock, A.G. (1973) “William Bateson, Mendelism, and Biometry”, Journal of the History of Biology 6: 1-36.

Collins, H.M. (1981) “Stages in the Empirical Program of Relativism”, Social Studies of Science 11: 3-10.

Collins, H.M. (1985) Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice. London: Sage.

Froggatt, P. and Nevin, N.C. (1971) “The Law of Ancestral Heredity and the Mendelian-Ancestrian Controversy in England, 1889-1906”, Journal of Medical Genetics 8: 1-36.

Gieryn, T. (1982) “Relativist/Constructionist Program in the Sociology of Science, Redundance or Retreat?”, Social Studies of Science 12: 279-297.

Harré, R. (1964) Matter and Method. Indianapolis, IN: Westview.

Hesse, M.B. (1974) The Structure of Scientific Inference. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Hesse, M.B. (1980a) “Quine, Duhem, and a New Empiricism”, in H. Morick (ed.) Challenges to Empiricism, pp. 208-228. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.

Hesse, M.B. (1980b) Revolutions and Reconstructions in the Philosophy of Science. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

Hesse, M.B. (1986) “Changing Concepts and Stable Order”, Social Studies of Science 16: 714-726.

Kim, K.M. (1991) “On the Reception of Johannsen's Pure Line Theory: Toward A Sociology of Scientific Validity”, Social Studies of Science 21: 649-679.

Kuhn, T.S. (1974) “Second Thoughts on Paradigms”, in F. Suppe (ed.) The Structure of Scientific Theories, pp. 459-482. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

Laudan, L. (1981) Science and Hypothesis. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Lukes, S. (1982) “Comments on David Bloor”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 13: 313-318.

MacKenzie, D. and Barnes, B. (1974) “Biometry-Mendelism Controversy and Its Explanation”, English typescript of MacKenzie and Barnes (1975).

MacKenzie, D. and Barnes, B. (1975) “Biometriker und Mendelianer. Eine Kontroverse und ihre Erklärung”, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 18: 165-196.

MacKenzie, D. and Barnes, B. (1979) “Scientific Judgment: The Biometry-Mendelism Controversy”, in B. Barnes and D. MacKenzie (eds) Natural Order: Historical Studies of Scientific Culture, pp. 191-210. Beverly Hills and London: Sage.

Mandelbaum, M. (1964) Philosophy, Science, and Sense Perception. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Merton, R.K. ([1945] 1973) “Paradigms for the Sociology of Knowledge”, in N.W. Storer (ed.) The Sociology of Science, pp. 7-40. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Mulkay, M. (1979) Science and the Sociology of Knowledge. London: George Allen and Unwin.

Pearson, K. (1908a) “Mendelian Characters Among Shorthorns”, Nature 77: 559.

Pearson, K. (1908b) “Note on the Skin Colour of the Crosses between Negro and White”, Biometrika 6: 348-353.

Popper, K.R. (1972) Objective Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Provine, W.B. (1971) Origins of Theoretical Population Genetics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Quine, W.V.O. (1969) Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. New York: Columbia University Press.

Roll-Hansen, N. (1978) “The Genotype Theory of Wilhelm Johannsen and its Relation to Plant Breeding and the Study of Evolution”, Centaurus 22: 201-235.

Roll-Hansen, N. (1989) “The Crucial Experiment of Wilhelm Johannsen”, Biology and Philosophy 4: 303-329.

Ruse, M. (1986) Taking Darwin Seriously. London: Basil Blackwell.

Shull, G.H. (1908) “The Composition of A Field of Maize”, Report of American Breeders Association 4: 296-301.

Shull, G.H. (1952) “Beginnings of the Heterosis Concept”, in J.W. Gowen (ed.) Heterosis, pp. 14-48. Ames: Iowa State College Press.

Smith, J.W. (1984) “Primitive Classification and the Sociology of Knowledge: A Response to David Bloor”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 15: 237-243.

Weldon, W.F.R. (1902a) “Professor de Vries on the Origin of Species”, Biometrika 1: 374.

Weldon, W.F.R. (1902b) “On the Ambiguities of Mendel's Categories”, Biometrika 1: 44-55.

Wilson, J.F. (1908) “Mendelian Characters Among Shorthorns”, Nature 77: 509.