Using as a starting point an idea expressed by Thomas Scheff in the 1980s about the benefit of having video recordings of interviews that have been done, I discuss in this article how online research interviews via communication platforms such as Zoom or Skype can strengthen research studies. The specific benefits of having a visual recording of an interview in addition to an audio recording are discussed and consideration is also given to why Scheff’s proposal did not receive greater acceptance in practice among the community of researchers when it was first proposed. The obstacles that might have impeded the application of Scheff’s proposal by researchers over the years are outlined and suggestions are made as to why modern communication platforms such as Zoom and Skype might now enable Scheff’s proposal to be implemented in research studies that utilize interviews as a method of inquiry.
Adams-HutchesonGLonghurstR (2017) ‘At least in person there would have been a cup of tea’: Interviewing via Skype. Area49(2): 148–155.
2.
ArchibaldMMAmbagtsheerRCCaseyMG, et al (2019) Using zoom videoconferencing for qualitative data collection: Perceptions and experiences of researchers and participants. International Journal of Qualitative Methods18: 1–8.
3.
BatesonGJacksonDDHaleyJ, et al (1956) Toward a theory of schizophrenia. Behavioral Science1(4): 251–264.
4.
CaldwellP (2013) Intensive interaction: Using body language to communicate. Journal on Developmental Disabilities19(1): 33–39.
5.
CassidyR (2010) Gambling as exchange: Horserace betting in London. International Gambling Studies10(2): 139–149.
6.
CaterJK (2011) Skype a cost-effective method for qualitative research. Rehabilitation Counselors & Educators Journal4(2): 3.
CraigSLMcInroyLBGouldenA, et al (2021) Engaging the senses in qualitative research via multimodal coding: Triangulating transcript, audio, and video data in a study with sexual and gender minority youth. International Journal of Qualitative Methods20: 1–12.
9.
DeakinHWakefieldK (2014) Skype interviewing: Reflections of two PhD researchers. Qualitative Research14(5): 603–616.
10.
DenscombeM (2003) The Good Research Guide Maidenhead. Milton Keynes: Open University.
EzzyD (2010) Qualitative interviewing as an embodied emotional performance. Qualitative Inquiry16(3): 163–170.
13.
FazeliSSabettiJFerrariM (2023) Performing qualitative content analysis of video data in social sciences and medicine: The visual-verbal video analysis method. International Journal of Qualitative Methods22: 1–17.
14.
GoffmanE (1956) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh, Social Sciences Research Centre.
15.
HermannsH (2004) Interviewing as an activity. In: FlickUKardorffEVSteinkeI (eds) A Companion to Qualitative Research. London: Sage, pp. 209–213.
16.
HochschildAR (1983) The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. Berkeley, CA; London: University of California Press.
17.
HochschildARMachungA (2003) The Second Shift: Working Parents and the Revolution at Home. London: Penguin.
18.
JennerBMMyersKC (2019) Intimacy, rapport, and exceptional disclosure: A comparison of in-person and mediated interview contexts. International Journal of Social Research Methodology22(2): 165–177.
19.
JohnsonJMRowlandsT (2014) The interpersonal dynamics of in-depth interviewing. In: GubriumJFHolsteinJAMarvastiAB, et al (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Interview Research: The Complexity of the Craft. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 99–113.
20.
KhalilACowieB (2020) A research note: Videoconferencing interviews. Waikato Journal of Education25(1): 101–107.
21.
LabovWFanshelD (1977) Therapeutic Discourse: Psychotherapy as Conversation. New York: Academic Press.
22.
LobeBMorganDHoffmanKA (2020) Qualitative data collection in an era of social distancing. International Journal of Qualitative Methods19: 1–8.
23.
MartinezLFalvelloVBAviezerH, et al (2016) Contributions of facial expressions and body language to the rapid perception of dynamic emotions. Cognition and Emotion30(5): 939–952.
24.
MohammedSSKnowlesLACummingsJA (2023) In the eye of the transcriber: Four column analysis structure for qualitative research with audiovisual data. International Journal of Qualitative Methods22: 1–9.
25.
NassauerALegewieNM (2021) Video data analysis: A methodological frame for a novel research trend. Sociological Methods & Research50(1): 135–174.
26.
NorrisS (2004) Analyzing Multimodal Interaction: A Methodological Framework. London: Routledge.
27.
OatesMCrichtonKCranorL, et al (2022) Audio, video, chat, email, or survey: How much does online interview mode matter?PLoS One17(2): 1–43.
28.
PittengerREHockettCFDanehyJJ (1960) The First Five Minutes: A Sample of Microscopic Interview Analysis. Ithaca, NY: Paul Martineau.
29.
RoulstonK (2010) Considering quality in qualitative interviewing. Qualitative Research10(2): 199–228.
30.
ScheffTJ (1986) Toward resolving the controversy over ‘thick description’. Current Anthropology27(4): 408–409.
31.
WalfordG (2007) Classification and framing of interviews in ethnographic interviewing. Ethnography and Education2(2): 145–157.
32.
WellerS (2017) Using internet video calls in qualitative (longitudinal)interviews: Some implications for rapport. International Journal of Social Research Methodology20(6): 613–625.
