This article explores the role of phrenology in the work of Auguste Comte. I begin by reviewing the historical and contemporary significance of this doctrine to show the direct lineage that exists between phrenology and what we now call cognitive neuroscience. I then demonstrate the impact of phrenology on Comte’s sociological theory and make the claim that his paradigm exemplifies what TenHouten called ‘neurosociology.’ Following this, I show how Comte’s social epistemology rejected biological reductionism and considered neurophysiology a subfield of sociology. This results in a somewhat startling assertion: Comte saw sociology as a cognitive science. After outlining Comte’s original vision for sociology as a discipline, I place Comte’s system in critical contact with 21st century neuroscience and suggest fruitful ways to move the neurosociology paradigm forward. In this I demonstrate that Comte’s vision for sociology is worth pursuing today, even while the specifics of his doctrine are not.
Abi-RachedJMRoseN (2010) The birth of the neuromolecular gaze. History of the Human Sciences23(1): 11–36.
2.
AndersonML (2014) After Phrenology: Neural Reuse and the Interactive Brain. Cambridge, MA: A Bradford Book.
3.
ArdilaABernalBRosselliM (2016) How localized are language brain areas? A review of Brodmann areas involvement in oral language. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology31(1): 112–122.
4.
BarashDPLiptonJE (2017 [1997]) Gender Gap: How Genes and Gender Influence Our Relationships. New York: Routledge.
5.
BarbaraJ-G (2012) Auguste Comte and the brain physiology of his time. Revue d’histoire des sciences65(2): 213–236.
6.
CacioppoJTPatrickW (2009) Loneliness: Human Nature and the Need for Social Connection. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
7.
ClarkeEJacynaLS (1987) Nineteenth-Century Origins of Neuroscientific Concepts. Berkeley: University of California Press.
8.
ComteA (1875a) System of Positive Polity. Vol. 1. London: Longmans, Green, and Co.
9.
ComteA (1875b) System of Positive Polity. Vol. 2. London: Longmans, Green, and Co.
10.
ComteA (1875c) System of Positive Polity. Vol. 3. London: Longmans, Green, and Co.
11.
ComteA (1875d) System of Positive Polity. Vol. 4. London: Longmans, Green, and Co.
12.
ComteA (1896a) The Positive Philosophy. Vol. 1. London: George Bell & Sons.
13.
ComteA (1896b) The Positive Philosophy. Vol. 2. London: George Bell & Sons.
14.
ComteA (1896c) The Positive Philosophy. Vol. 3. London: George Bell & Sons.
15.
ComteA (1975 [1822]) Plan of the scientific operations necessary for reorganizing society (third essay). In: LenzerG (ed.) Auguste Comte and Positivism: The Essential Writings. New York: Harper Torchbooks, 9–67.
16.
ComteA (2009 [1858]) The Catechism of Positive Religion: Or Summary Exposition of the Universal Religion in Thirteen Systematic Conversations between a Woman and a Priest of Humanity. 3rd ed.Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
17.
CooterR (1984) The Cultural Meaning of Popular Science: Phrenology and the Organization of Consent in Nineteenth-Century Britain. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
18.
CoserL (1971) Masters of Sociological Thought: Ideas in Historical and Social Context. New York: Harcourt.
DamasioA (1996) The somatic marker hypothesis and the possible functions of the prefrontal cortex. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences351(1346): 1413–1420.
22.
DamasioACarvalhoGB (2013) The nature of feelings: Evolutionary and neurobiological origins. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience14(2): 143–152.
23.
Di PellegrinoGFadigaLFogassiL, et al. (1992) Understanding motor events: A neurophysiological study. Experimental Brain Research91(1): 176–180.
24.
DoidgeN (2007) The Brain That Changes Itself: Stories of Personal Triumph from the Frontiers of Brain Science. New York: Viking.
25.
EntineJ (2008) Taboo: Why Black Athletes Dominate Sports and Why We’re Afraid to Talk About It. New York: PublicAffairs.
26.
EvansJSStanovichKE (2013) Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science8(3): 223–241.
27.
FranksDD (2006) The neuroscience of emotions. In: StetsJETurnerJH (eds) Handbook of the Sociology of Emotions. Boston, MA: Springer, 38–62.
28.
FranksDD (2010) Neurosociology: The Nexus between Neuroscience and Social Psychology. New York: Springer.
29.
FranksDDTurnerJH (eds) (2013) Handbook of Neurosociology. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
30.
GuillinV (2009) Auguste Comte and John Stuart Mill on Sexual Equality: Historical, Methodological, and Philosophical Issues. Boston: Brill.
31.
GuillinV (2012) The biological basis of Comte’s sociology. Revue d’histoire des sciences65(2): 259–285.
32.
HaacO (1995) The Correspondence of John Stuart Mill and Auguste Comte. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
33.
HaidtJ (2001) The emotional dog and its rational tail. Psychological Review108(4): 814–834.
34.
HerrnsteinRMurrayC (1994) The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life. New York: Free Press.
35.
KosikKS (2003) Beyond phrenology, at last. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience4(3): 234–239.
36.
LizardoO (2014) Beyond the Comtean schema: The sociology of culture and cognition versus cognitive social science. Sociological Forum29(4): 983–989.
37.
McVeighR (2020) Organism and environment in Auguste Comte. History of the Human Sciences. Epub ahead of print 6 May 2020. DOI: 10.1177/0952695120917908.
NauACPintarCArnoldussenA, et al. (2015) Acquisition of visual perception in blind adults using the BrainPort artificial vision device. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy69(1): 1–8.
40.
Parker JonesOAlfaro-AlmagroFJbabdiS (2018) An empirical, 21st century evaluation of phrenology. Cortex; A Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior106: 26–35.
41.
PickeringM (1996) Angels and demons in the moral vision of Auguste Comte. Journal of Women’s History8(2): 10–40.
42.
Pitts-TaylorV (2014) Cautionary notes on navigating the neurocognitive turn. Sociological Forum29(4): 995–1000.
43.
RossED (2010) Cerebral localization of functions and the neurology of language: Fact versus fiction or is it something else?The Neuroscientist: A Review Journal Bringing Neurobiology, Neurology and Psychiatry16(3): 222–243.
44.
ScharffRC (1995) Comte after Positivism. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
45.
TenHoutenW (1997) Neurosociology. Journal of Social and Evolutionary Systems20(1): 7–37.
46.
TremblayPDickAS (2016) Broca and Wernicke are dead, or moving past the classic model of language neurobiology. Brain and Language162: 60–71.
47.
TurnerSP (2002) Brains/Practices/Relativism: Social Theory after Cognitive Science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
48.
TurnerSP (2018) Cognitive Science and the Social. New York: Routledge.
49.
UttalWR (2001) The New Phrenology: The Limits of Localizing Cognitive Processes in the Brain. Cambridge, MA: A Bradford Book.
50.
VernonR (1986) The political self: Auguste Comte and phrenology. History of European Ideas7(3): 271–286.
51.
VidalF (2009) Brainhood, anthropological figure of modernity. History of the Human Sciences22(1): 5–36.
52.
VreckoS (2010) Neuroscience, power and culture: An introduction. History of the Human Sciences23(1): 1–10.
53.
WexlarBE (2006) Brain and Culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
54.
YoungRM (1970) Mind, Brain and Adaptation in the Nineteenth Century: Cerebral Localization and Its Biological Context from Gall to Ferrier. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
55.
ZerubavelE (1997) Social Mindscapes: An Invitation to Cognitive Sociology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
56.
Zola-MorganS (1995) Localization of brain function: The legacy of Franz Joseph Gall (1758–1828). Annual Review of Neuroscience18(1): 359–383.
