The problem of how to access and estimate the proliferation of receptions of Ludwik Fleck’s work in domains as diverse as social geography, history of clinical medicine, and cognitive sociology has long remained vexing. The approach suggested in this paper combines the hermeneutics of effective-historical reception with a version of epistemic reconstruction of intellectual history. Special emphasis is placed upon the forms of political contextualization of Fleck’s comparative sociology of thought styles. The author argues that the heterogeneity of receptions is essentially informed by the specificity of the ‘implicit reader’ Fleck assigned to his work. Interestingly enough, it is a ‘reader’ congruent with the post-metaphysical turns in the social sciences. This claim is defended by analyzing particular trajectories of reception of Fleck’s work.
AmsterdamskaO (2004) Achieving disbelief: Thought styles, microbial variation, and American and British epidemiology, 1900–1940. Studies in History of Biological and Biomedical Sciences35: 483–507.
2.
BabichB (2003a) From Fleck’s Denkstil to Kuhn’s paradigm: Conceptual schemes and incommensurability. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science17(1): 75–92.
3.
BabichB (2003b) Kuhn’s paradigm as a parable for the Cold War: Incommensurability and its discontents from Fuller’s Tale of Harvard to Fleck’s Unsung Lvov. Social Epistemology17(2–3): 99–109.
4.
BabichB (2014) Fleck’s The Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact and the pseudo-sciences (Or how to talk about AIDS, homeopathy, and other damned things). Collegium Helveticum Heft12: 58–79.
5.
Ben-MenahemY (2006) Conventionalism: From Poincaré to Quine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
BloorD (1986) Some determinants of cognitive style in science. In: CohenRSSchnelleT (eds) Cognition and Fact (Materials on Ludwik Fleck). Dordrecht/Boston, MA: D Reidel, 387–398.
7.
BorckC (2004) Message in a bottle from ‘the crisis of reality’: On Ludwik Fleck’s interventions for an open epistemology. Studies in History of Biological and Biomedical Sciences35: 447–464.
8.
BraunsteinJ-F (2009) Fleck, Canguilhem, Foucault: Ludwik Fleck et le ‘style français’ en philosophie des sciences. In: FehrJJasNLöwyI (eds) Penser avec Fleck – Investigating a life studying life sciences. Yearbook of Collegium Helveticum Heft7: 91–100.
9.
BrorsonSAndersenH (2001) Stabilizing and changing phenomenal worlds: Ludwik Fleck and Thomas Kuhn on scientific literature. Journal for General Philosophy of Science32: 109–129.
10.
FleckL (1979) Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
11.
FleckL (1986) Crisis in science. In: CohenRSSchnelleT (eds) Cognition and Fact (Materials on Ludwik Fleck). Dordrecht/Boston, MA: D Reidel, 153–160. (first published in 1960)
12.
FleckL (2011) Wissenschaft und Umwelt. In: WernerSZittelC (eds) Ludwik Fleck Denkstile und Tatachen. Frankfurt-am-Main: Suhrkamp, 327–335. (first published in 1939)
13.
FreudenthalG (1990) Epistémologie des sciences de la nature et herméneutique de l’histoire des sciences selon Hélène Metzger. In: FreudenthalG (ed.) Etudes sur Hélène Metzger. Leiden: EJ Brill, 219–236.
14.
FreudenthalGLöwyI (1988) Ludwik Fleck’s roles in society: A case study using Joseph Ben-David’s paradigm for a sociology of knowledge. Social Studies of Science18: 625–651.
15.
GadamerH-G (1989) Truth and Method, transl. by WeinsheimerJMarshallDG. London: Continuum. (2nd ed.)
16.
GaudillièreJ-P (2004) Genesis and development of a biomedical object: Styles of thought, styles of work, and history of the sex steroids. Studies in History of Biological and Biomedical Sciences35: 525–543.
17.
GinevD (1984) Comparative analysis of scientific knowledge: A sketch of a possible methodological research program. Epistemologia7: 74–84.
18.
GinevD (1997) A Passage to the Hermeneutic Philosophy of Science. Amsterdam/Atlanta, GA: Rodopi. (Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities, vol. 53)
19.
GinevD (2006) The Context of Constitution: Beyond the edge of epistemological justification. Dordrecht/Boston, MA: Springer.
20.
GrafEOMutterK (2000) Zur Rezeption des Werkes von Ludwik Fleck. Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung54(2): 274–288.
21.
HagnerM (2012) Perception, knowledge and freedom in the age of extremes: On the historical epistemology of Ludwik Fleck and Michael Polanyi. Studies in East European Thought64: 107–120.
22.
HarwoodJ (1986) Ludwik Fleck and the sociology of knowledge. Social Studies of Science16: 173–187.
23.
HedforsE (2006) The reading of Fleck: Questions of sources and impetus. Social Epistemology20: 131–161.
24.
HedforsE (2007) The reading of scientific texts: Questions on interpretation and evaluation, with special reference to scientific writings of Ludwik Fleck. Studies in History of Biological and Biomedical Sciences38: 136–158.
25.
HeelanP (1986) Fleck’s contribution to epistemology. In: CohenRSSchnelleT (eds) Cognition and Fact (Materials on Ludwik Fleck). Dordrecht/Boston, MA: D Reidel, 287–308.
26.
KindtTMullerH-H (2006) The Implied Author: Concept and controversy. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
27.
LipphardtV (2005) Denkstil, Denkkollektiv und wissenschaftliche Tatsachen der deutschen Rassenforschung voe 1933. Zur Anwendbarkeit des wissenschaftshistorischen Ansatzes von Ludwik Fleck. In: EgloffR (ed.) Tatsache – Denkstil – Kontroverse: Auseinandersetzungen mit Ludwik Fleck, Yearbook of Collegium Helveticum Heft1: 63–70.
28.
LöwyI (1988) The scientific roots of constructivist epistemologies: Hélène Metzger and Ludwik Fleck. In: FreudenthalG (ed.) Etudes sur Hélène Metzger. Leiden: E.J. Brill, 219–236.
29.
LöwyI (2004a) ‘A river that is cutting its own bed’: The serology of syphilis between laboratory, society, and law. Studies in History of Biological and Biomedical Sciences35: 509–524.
30.
LöwyI (2004b) Introduction: Ludwik Fleck’s epistemology of medicine and biomedical sciences. Studies in History of Biological and Biomedical Sciences35: 437–445.
31.
MolA (2002) The Body Multiple: Ontology in medical practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
32.
MößnerN (2011) Thought styles and paradigms – A comparative study of Ludwik Fleck and Thomas Kuhn. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science42: 362–371.
33.
OudshoornN (1994) Beyond the Natural Body: An archaeology of sex hormones. London/New York, NY: Routledge.
34.
RheinbergerH-J (2005) Zur Historizität des Wissens: Ludwik Fleck, Edmund Husserl. In: RheinbergerH-J (ed.) Die Epistemologie des Konkreten. Frankfurt-am-Main: Suhrkamp, 21–35.
35.
RheinbergerH-J (2010a) On Historicizing Epistemology. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
36.
RheinbergerH-J (2010b) On the historicity of scientific knowledge: Ludwik Fleck, Gaston Bachelard, Edmund Husserl. In: HyderDRheinbergerH-J (eds) Science and the Life-World: Essays on Husserl’s ‘Crisis of the European Sciences’. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press, 164–176.
37.
SchlünderM (2005) Flüchtige Körper, instabile Räume, widersprüchliche Theorien: Die produktive Vagheit der Erkenntnistheorie Ludwik Flecks und die Geschichte der Reproduktionsmedizin. In: EgloffR (ed.) Tatsache – Denkstil Kontroverse: Auseinandersetzungen mit Ludwik Fleck, Yearbook of Collegium Helveticum Heft 1: 57–62.
38.
SeidelM (2011) Relativism or relationism? A Mannheimian interpretation of Fleck’s claims about relativism. Journal for General Philosophy of Science42: 219–240.
39.
ShapinS (1986) History of science and its sociological reconstructions. In: CohenRSSchnelleT (eds) Cognition and Fact (Materials on Ludwik Fleck). Dordrecht/Boston, MA: D Reidel, 325–386.
40.
SindingC (2004) The specificity of medical facts: The case of diabetology. Studies in History of Biological and Biomedical Sciences35: 545–559.
41.
SindingC (2009) De Fleck à Canguilhem: La medicine comme épistémologie de l’incertain. In: FehrJJasNLöwyI (eds) Penser avec Fleck – Investigating a life studying life sciences, Yearbook of Collegium Helveticum Heft7: 101–110.
42.
ZalcB (1986) Some comments on Ludwik Fleck’s interpretation of the Bordet–Wassemann Reaction in view of present biochemical knowledge. In: CohenRSSchnelleT (eds) Cognition and Fact (Materials on Ludwik Fleck). Dordrecht/Boston, MA: D Reidel, 399–406.
