The aim of this article is to bring together quantitative and qualitative methodologies in order to examine, within a broadly Bourdieusian theoretical framework, connections between positions in social space and strategies agents deploy in their everyday life. The data are derived from a study of social structure in today’s Serbia, combining survey and interviews with selected respondents. Strategies are conceptualized as a continuum ranging from a more sustained and cumulative, or ‘strategic’, pole to the unsystematic, ephemeral ‘tactical’ pole, as suggested by Michel de Certeau. On the basis of interview data, four types of life strategies are identified (individualist reactive, individualist proactive, collectivist reactive, and collectivist proactive). These strategies are presented through their generic practices and the typical habitus of the agents, along with individual portraits as illustrations. In conclusion, some theoretical implications are derived from data analysis, including departures from Bourdieu’s model.
AlexanderJC (1995) Fin-de-siècle Social Theory: Relativism, reduction and the problem of reason. London: Verso.
2.
BabovićM (2009) Postsocijalistička transformacija i socioekonomske strategije domaćinstava i porodica u Srbiji [Postsocialist Transformation and Socio-Economic Strategies of Households and Families in Serbia]. Belgrade: ISI FF.
3.
BennettT. (2009) Culture, Class, Distinction. London/New York, NY: Routledge.
4.
BourdieuP (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5.
BourdieuP (1979) Distinction: Critique sociale du jugement. Paris: Editions du Minuit.
6.
BourdieuP (1990 [1980]) The Logic of Practice, trans. RichardNice. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
LazićM (ed) (2000) Račji hod: Srbija u transformacijskim procesima [Crab Walk: Serbia in Transformative Processes]. Belgrade: Filip Višnjić.
21.
LazićM (2007) Post-socialist transformation in Serbia: Changing recruitment patterns of economic elites. In: LaneDSLengyelGTholenJ (eds) Restructuring of the Economic Elites after State Socialism: Recruitment, institutions and attitudes. Stuttgart: Ibidem-Verlag, 115–126.
22.
LebartLMorineauAWarwickKM (1984) Multivariate Descriptive Statistical Analysis: Correspondence analysis and related techniques for large matrices. New York, NY: Wiley.
23.
LedenevaAV (1998) Russia’s Economy of Favours: Blat, networking and informal exchange. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24.
LedenevaAV (2006) How Russia Really Works: The informal practices that shaped post-Soviet politics and business. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
25.
Le RouxBRouanetH (2010) Multiple Correspondence Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
Le RouxBRouanetHSavageMWardeA (2008) Class and cultural division in the UK. Sociology42(6): 1049–1071.
27.
MihailovićS (ed.) (2010) Kako građani Srbije vide tranziciju [Transition through the Eyes of Serbian Citizens]. Belgrade: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.
28.
MilićA (ed.) (2005) Transformation and Strategies: Everyday life in Serbia at the beginning of the 3rd millennium. Belgrade: Institute for Sociological Research.
29.
MingioneE (1994) Life strategies and social economies in the postfordist age. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research18(1): 24–45.
30.
PavlowitchS (2002) Serbia: The history behind the name. London: Hurst.
31.
PetrovićM (2010) Potrošnja domaćinstava i socijalna diferencijacija u Srbiji 2003–2007 [Household consumption and social differentiation in Serbia 2003–2007]. In: CvejićS (ed.) Suživot s reformama [Living with Reforms]. Belgrade: ISI FF, 125–152.
32.
PineFBridgerS (eds) (1998) Surviving Post-Socialism: Local strategies and regional responses in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union. London: Routledge.
33.
ScottJ (1985) Weapons of the Weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
34.
StraussALCorbinJ (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research. London: Sage.
35.
ThomasR (1999) The Politics of Serbia in the 1990s. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
36.
TomanovićS (ed.) (2012) Mladi – naša sadašnjost [The Young – Our Contemporaries]. Belgrade: Institute for Sociological Research.
37.
WallaceC (2002) Household strategies: Their conceptual relevance and analytical scope in social research. Sociology36(2): 275–292.
