BairdRG (2012) Unpacking democracy and governance: Conceptualizing governance infrastructure. Social Science Information51(2): 263–279.
2.
BélangerLFontaine-SkronskiK (2012) ‘Legalization’ in international relations: A conceptual analysis. Social Science Information51(2): 238–262.
3.
BenoitM (2012) Qu’est-ce que le corporatisme? Conceptualisation et opérationnalisation du méso-corporatisme. Information sur les sciences sociales51(2): 217–237.
4.
BerthelotJM (1990) L’Intelligence du Social: Le pluralisme explicatif en sociologie. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
5.
CollierDGerringJ (eds) (2009) Concepts and Method in Social Science: The tradition of Giovanni Sartori. London: Routledge.
6.
DaigneaultPMJacobJ (2012) Les concepts souffrent-ils de négligence bénigne en sciences sociales? Eléments d’analyse conceptuelle et examen exploratoire de la littérature francophone à caractère methodologique. Information sur les sciences sociales51(2): 188–204.
7.
DaviesHTONutleySMSmithPC (1999) Editorial: What works? The role of evidence in public sector policy and practice. Public Money and Management19(1): 3–5.
8.
GerringJ (1999) What makes a concept good? A criterial framework for understanding concept formation in the social sciences. Polity31(3): 357–393.
9.
GoertzG (2006) Social Science Concepts: A user’s guide. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10.
GoertzGMahoneyJ (2012) Concepts and measurement: Ontology and epistemology. Social Science Information51(2): 205–216.
11.
HansenHFRieperO (2009) The evidence movement: The development and consequences of methodologies in review practices. Evaluation15(2): 141–163.
12.
ImbeauLM (2005) Pour un pluralisme explicatif en analyse des politiques. In: ImbeauLM (ed.) Politiques Publiques Comparées dans les Etats Fédérés. Québec: Presses de l’Université Laval, 243–255.
13.
ImbeauLM (2012) Conclusion: Plea for a real epistemic pluralism. Social Science Information51(2): 301–307.
14.
McCannJThiboutotM (2012) Méthodologie d’analyse conceptuelle appliquée: Comment définir le concept de ‘partenariat public–privé’ dans une perspective juridique et transdisciplinaire?Information sur les sciences sociales51(2): 280–300.
15.
OakleyA (2002) Social science and evidence-based everything: The case of education. Educational Review54(3): 277–286.
16.
PawsonR (2002) Evidence-based policy: In search of a method. Evaluation8(2): 157–181.
17.
SartoriG (2009[1984]) Guidelines for concept analysis. In: CollierDGerringJ (eds) Concepts and Method in Social Science: The tradition of Giovanni Sartori. London: Routledge, 97–150.
18.
SchedlerA (2011) Concept formation. In: BadieBBerg-SchlosserDMorlinoLA (eds) International Encyclopedia of Political Science. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.