The question of social ontology is considered irrelevant to the economic debate on the genesis of the firm. This article aims to show that the ontological nature of the firm can be explained by stressing the need to: (1) go beyond simple individualism and reductionism; (2) analyze the firm as a (re)constitutive emergent entity; (3) understand the cohesive interrelations between the human constituents and the nonhuman resources; and (4) define the firm as an institutionalized organization.
AdelsteinR (2010) Firms as social actors. Journal of Institutional Economics6(3): 329–349.
2.
AgassiJ (1975) Institutional individualism. British Journal of Sociology2(2): 144–155.
3.
AlchianAADemsetzH (1972) Production, information costs, and economic organization. American Economic Review62(5): 777–795.
4.
ArcherM (2000) Being Human: The problem of agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5.
BerleAAMeansGC (1932) The Modern Corporation and Private Property. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
6.
BessyCFavereauO (2003) Institutions et économie des conventions. Cahiers d’Économie Politique44: 119–164.
7.
BhaskarR (2008[1975]) A Realist Theory of Science. New York: Routledge.
8.
BiesRJBartunekJMFortT LZaldMN (2007) Corporations as social change agents: Individual, interpersonal, institutional, and environmental dynamics. Academy of Management Review32(3): 788–793.
9.
BouldingKE (1956) General systems theory: The skeleton of science. Management Science2(3): 197–208.
10.
BungeM (2003) Emergence and Convergence: Qualitative novelty and the unity of knowledge. Toronto: Toronto University Press.
11.
ChassagnonV (2010a) Firme (-réseau)et relations de pouvoir: une analyse théorique. Economie Appliquée63(2): 23–54.
12.
ChassagnonV (2010b) Jalons pour une théorie de la firme comme entité fondée sur le pouvoir. Le gouvernement interne et externe des firmes modernes. Thèse de doctorat ès sciences économiques, Lyon, Université Lumière Lyon 2, 599p.
13.
ChassagnonV (2011a) The network-firm as a single real entity: Beyond the aggregate of distinct legal entities. Journal of Economic Issues45(1): 113–136.
14.
ChassagnonV (2011b) The law and economics of the modern firm: A new structure of power relationships. Revue d’Economie Industrielle134: 25–50.
15.
ChassagnonV (2011c) Organisation et institution: vers une socioéconomie de la firme?International Review of Sociology21(3).
16.
CoaseRH (1937) The nature of the firm. Economica4(16): 386–405.
17.
CommonsJR (1924) Legal Foundations of Capitalism. New York: The Macmillan Company.
18.
CommonsJR (1970[1950]) The Economics of Collective Action. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press. (2e édn)
19.
CordesCRichersonPJMcElreathRStrimlingP (2008) A naturalistic approach to the theory of the firm: The role of cooperation and cultural evolution. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization68(1): 125–139.
20.
DavisGF (2006) Mechanisms and the theory of organizations. Journal of Management Inquiry15(2): 114–118.
21.
DavisJB (2006) Social identity strategies in recent economics. Journal of Economic Methodology13(3): 371–390.
22.
DemsetzH (1983) The structure of ownership and the theory of the firm. Journal of Law and Economics26(2): 375–390.
23.
DeweyJ (2002[1922]) Human Nature and Conduct: An introduction to social psychology. Amherst: Prometheus Books.
24.
DooleyKJ (1997) A complex adaptative systems model of organization change. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences1(1): 69–97.
25.
DownwardPMearmanA (2007) Retroduction as mixed-methods triangulation in economic research: Reorienting economics into social science. Cambridge Journal of Economics31(1): 77–99.
26.
DupuyJ-P (2004) Vers l’unité des sciences sociales autour de l’individualisme méthodologique complexe. Revue du MAUSS24: 310–328.
27.
Elder-VassD (2008a) Integrating institutional, relational, and embodied structure: An emergentist perspective. British Journal of Sociology59(2): 281–299.
28.
Elder-VassD (2008b) Searching for realism, structure and agency in actor network theory. British Journal of Sociology59(3): 455–473.
29.
Elder-VassD (2010) The Casual Power of Social Structures: Emergence, structure and agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30.
EnnenERichterA (2010) The whole is more than the sum of its parts or is it? A review of the empirical literature on complementarities in organizations. Journal of Management36(1): 207–233.
31.
EtzioniA (1996) The responsive community: A communitarian perspective. American Sociological Review61(1): 1–11.
32.
GalbraithJK (1973) Power and the useful economist. American Economic Review63(1): 1–11.
33.
GarettJE (1988) Persons, kinds, and corporations: An Aristotelian view. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research49(2): 261–281.
34.
GiddensA (1984) The Constitution of Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
35.
GoldspinkCKayR (2004) Bridging the micro–macro divide: A new basis for social science. Human Relations57(5): 597–618.
36.
HartOD (1995) Firms, Contracts, and Financial Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37.
HatchMJ (1993) The dynamics of organizational culture. Academy of Management Review18(4): 657–693.
38.
HodgsonGM (2002a) The legal nature of the firm and the myth of the firm–market hybrid. International Journal of the Economics of Business9(1): 36–60.
39.
HodgsonGM (2002b) Reconstitutive downward causation: Social structure and the development of individual agency. In: FullbrookE (ed.) Intersubjectivity in Economics: Agents and structure. Londres & New York: Routledge, 159–180.
40.
HodgsonGM (2004a) On the Evolution of Institutional Economics: Agency, structure and Darwinism in American institutionalism. Londres & New York: Routledge.
41.
HodgsonGM (2004b) Reclaiming habit for institutional economics. Journal of Economic Psychology25(5): 651–660.
42.
HodgsonGM (2006) What are institutions?Journal of Economic Issues40(1): 1–25.
43.
HodgsonGMKnudsenT (2010) Darwin’s Conjecture: The search for general principles of social & economic evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
44.
HollandJH (1998) Emergence: From chaos to order. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
45.
JensenMCMecklingWH (1976) Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership. Journal of Financial Economics3(4): 305–360.
46.
KauffmanSA (1995) At Home in the Universe: The search for the law of self-organization and complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
47.
KayRGoldspinkC (2000) Towards a complex non-linear systems theory of organization. Actes de ‘1st international conference on systems thinking in management’: 288–293.
48.
KimJ (1999) Making sense of emergence. Philosophical Studies95(1/2): 3–36.
49.
LawsonT (1997) Economics and Reality. Londres: Routledge.
50.
LawsonT (2004) A conception of ontology. Unpublished manuscript, University of Cambridge.
51.
LawsonT (2009) Cambridge social ontology: An interview with Tony Lawson. Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics2(1): 101–122.
52.
MäkiU (2004) Theoretical isolation and explanatory progress: Transaction cost economics and the dynamics of dispute. Cambridge Journal of Economics28(3): 319–346.
MilgromPRobertsJ (1990) The economics of modern manufacturing: Technology, strategy and organization. American Economic Review80(3): 511–528.
55.
NooteboomB (2009) A Cognitive Theory of the Firm: Learning, governance and dynamic capabilities. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
56.
NorthDC (1994) Economic performance through time. American Economic Review84(3): 359–367.
57.
NorthDCWallisJWeingastBR (2009) Violence and Social Orders: A conceptual framework for interpreting recorded human history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
58.
OlsonM (1965) The Logic of Collective Action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
59.
OstromE (2000) Collective action and the evolution of social norms. Journal of Economic Perspectives14(3): 137–158.
60.
ParsonsT (1960) A sociological approach to the theory of organizations. In: ParsonsT (ed.) Structure and Process in Modern Societies. Glencoe, IL: Free Press, 16–58.
61.
PentlandBTRueterHH (1994) Organizational routines as grammars of action. Administrative Science Quarterly39(3): 484–510.
62.
PerrouxF (1973) Pouvoir et Economie. Paris–Bruxelles–Montréal: Bordas.
63.
PhillipsMJ (1994) Reappraising the real entity theory of the corporation. Florida State University Law Review21(4): 1061–1122.
64.
PottsJ (2000) The New Evolutionary Microeconomics: Complexity, competence, and adaptative behavior. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
65.
QuineWV (1948) On what there is. Review of Metaphysics, 2(5): 21–38.
66.
QuineWV (1958) Speaking of objects. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 31: 5–22.
67.
RajanRGZingalesL (2000) The governance of the new enterprise. In: VivesX (ed.) Corporate Governance: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 201–227.
68.
RaymondRL (1906) The genesis of the corporation. Harvard Law Review19(5): 350–365.
69.
RobertsJ (2004) The Modern Firm: Organizational design for performance and growth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
70.
SawyerKR (2001) Emergence in sociology: Contemporary philosophy of mind and some implications for sociological theory. American Journal of Sociology107(3): 551–585.
71.
SawyerKR (2005) Social Emergence: Societies as complex systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
72.
SearleJR (1995) The Construction of Social Reality. Londres: Allen Lane.
73.
SearleJR (2005) What is an institution?Journal of Institutional Economics1(1): 1–22.
74.
SimonHA (1962) The architecture of complexity. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society106(6): 467–482.
75.
SimonHA (1991) Organizations and markets. Journal of Economic Perspectives5(2): 2544.
76.
SmutsCJ (2007[1926]) Holism and Evolution. Whitefish: Kessinger Publishing.
77.
StaussJH (1944) The entrepreneur: The firm. Journal of Political Economy52(2): 112–127.
78.
StinchcombeAL (1991) The conditions of fruitfulness of theorizing about mechanisms in social science. Philosophy of the Social Sciences21(3): 367–388.
79.
TsoukasH (1996) The firm as a distributed knowledge system: A constructionist approach. Strategic Management Journal17: 11–25.
80.
TuomelaR (1989) Actions by collective. Philosophical Perspectives3: 471–496.
81.
TylerTRBladerSL (2001) Identity and cooperative behavior in groups. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations4(3): 207–226.
82.
Van den BerghJCJMGowdyJM (2003) Coevolution of economic behavior and institutions: Towards a theory of institutional change. Journal of Evolutionary Economics13(3): 289–317.
83.
Van den BerghJCJMGowdyJM (2009) A group selection perspective on economic behavior and organization. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization72(1): 1–20.
84.
VandenbergheF (2007) Une ontologie réaliste pour la sociologie: système, morphogénèse et collectifs. Social Science Information46(3): 487–542.
85.
VeblenT (1898) Why is economics not an evolutionary science?Quarterly Journal of Economics12(4): 373–397.
86.
Von BertalanffyL (1968) Organismic Psychology and System Theory. Worcester: Clark University Press.
WeinsteinO (2010) Pouvoir, finance et connaissance: Les transformations de l’entreprise capitaliste entre 20ème et 21ème siècle. Paris: Editions La Découverte.
