This study considers the effect of participants’ evaluation of self-deprecatory and other-deprecatory (attack) humorous comments made by presidential candidates Barack Obama and John McCain during the 2008 electoral season. Humor, by evoking laughter in an audience, provides evidence of support for competitors for a leadership position through social contagion, and can be used to attack competitors (Alexander, 1986) while sanctioning behavior at odds with group norms, whereas humor focused on oneself may be seen as a way of attending to egalitarian norms while ascending the dominance hierarchy (Boehm, 1999). A total of 185 participants analyzed here took part in a web-based experiment carried out 2 weeks before the 2008 presidential election. Short video excerpts of the presidential candidates making both self-deprecatory and other-deprecatory humorous comments serve as stimuli. Findings suggest previously held opinions about the presidential candidates influence participant evaluation of humorous comments by the candidates. These comments, in turn, influence how participants evaluate the candidate making the humorous comment.
AbelsonRPKinderDRPetersMDFiskeST (1982) Affective and semantic components in political personal perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology42: 619–630.
2.
AlexanderRD (1986) Ostracism and indirect reciprocity: The reproductive significance of humor. Ethology and Sociobiology7: 253–270.
3.
AxelrodR (1997) The Complexity of Cooperation: Agent-Based Models of Competition and Collaboration. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
4.
BaumgartnerJC (2008) Editorial cartoons 2.0: The effects of digital political satire on presidential candidate evaluations. Presidential Studies Quarterly38: 735–758.
5.
BaumgartnerJC (2007) American youth and the effects of online political humor. In: BaumgartnerJCMorrisJS (eds) Laughing Matters: Humor and American Politics in the Media Age. New York: Routledge, 131–147.
6.
BaymG (2007) Representation and the politics of play: Stephen Colbert’s ‘Better Know a District’. Political Communication24: 359–376.
7.
BennettWL (1996) News: The Politics of Illusion, 3rd edn.White Plains, NY: Longman.
8.
BippusA (2007) Factors predicting the perceived effectiveness of politicians’ use of humor during a debate. Humor20: 105–121.
9.
BoehmC (1999) Hierarchy in the Forest: The Evolution of Egalitarian Behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.
BoskinJ (1990) American political humor: Touchables and taboos. International Political Science Review11: 473–482.
11.
BrackenCC (2005) Presence and image quality: The case of high-definition television. Media Psychology7: 191–205.
12.
BraderT (2006) Campaigning for Hearts and Minds: How Emotional Appeals in Political Ads Work. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
13.
CampbellAConversePEMillerWEStokesDE (1960) The American Voter. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
14.
ComptonJ (2007) Political punditry in punchlines: Late night comics take on the 2004 presidential debates. In: BaumgartnerJCMorrisJS (eds) Laughing Matters: Humor and American Politics in the Media Age. New York: Routledge, 171–186.
15.
DaileyWOHinckEAHinckSS (2005) Audience perceptions of politeness and advocacy skills in the 2000 and 2004 presidential debates. Argumentation and Advocacy, 41: 196–210.
16.
DmitrievAV (2006) Humor and politics. Anthropology and Archeology of Eurasia44: 64–100.
17.
Eibl-EibesfeldtI (1989) Human Ethology. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
18.
FeinSGoethalsGRKuglerMB (2007) Social influence on political judgments: The case of presidential debates. Political Psychology28: 165–192.
19.
FergusonMAFordTE (2008) Disparagement humor: A theoretical and empirical review of psychoanalytic, superiority, and social identity theories. Humor21: 283–312.
20.
FowlerJH (2008) The Colbert bump in campaign contributions: More truthful than truthy. PS: Political Science and Politics41: 533–539.
21.
FrankRH (1988) Passions Within Reason: The Strategic Role of the Emotions. New York: WW Norton.
22.
FridlundAJ (1994) Human Facial Expression: An Evolutionary View. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
23.
FridlundAJ (1997) The new ethology of human facial expressions. In: RussellJAFernandez-DolsJM (eds) The Psychology of Facial Expression. London: Cambridge University Press, 103–129.
24.
GardnerG (1994) Campaign Comedy: Political Humor from Clinton to Kennedy. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
25.
GavanskiI (1986) Differential sensitivity of humor ratings and mirth responses to cognitive and affective components of the humor response. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology51: 209–214.
26.
GrabeMEBucyEP (2009) Image Bite Politics: News and the Visual Framing of Elections. New York: Oxford University Press.
27.
GrayJA (1987) The Psychology of Fear and Stress. New York: Cambridge University Press.
28.
GreengrossGMillerGF (2008) Dissing oneself versus dissing rivals: Effects of status, personality, and sex on the short-term and long-term attractiveness of self-deprecating and other-deprecating humor. Evolutionary Psychology6: 393–408.
29.
HatfieldECacioppoJTRapsonRL (1994) Emotional Contagion. Paris: Cambridge University Press.
30.
HetheringtonMJWeilerJD (2009) Authoritarianism and Polarization in American Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
31.
InbarYPizarroDABloomP (2009) Conservatives are more easily disgusted than liberals. Cognition and Emotion23: 714–725.
32.
JanesLMOlsonJM (2000) Jeer pressure: The behavioral effects of observing ridicule in others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin26: 474–485.
33.
LaMarreHLLandrevilleKDBeamMA (2009) The irony of satire: Political ideology and the motivation to see what you want to see in the Colbert Report. International Journal of Press/Politics14: 212–231.
34.
LanzettaJSullivanDGMastersRDMcHugoGJ (1985) Emotional and cognitive responses to televised images of political leaders. In: KrausSPerloffR (eds) Mass Media and Political Thought. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 85–116.
35.
LombardMReichRDGrabeMEBrackenCCDittonTB (2000) Presence and television: The role of screen size. Human Communication Research26: 75–98.
36.
LorenzK (1963) On Aggression. New York: MJF Books.
37.
MarcusGENeumanWRMackuenM (2000) Affective Intelligence and Political Judgment. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
38.
MartinRA (2007) The Psychology of Humor: An Integrative Approach. New York: Elsevier.
39.
MartinRAPuhlik-DorisPLarsenGGrayJWeirK (2003) Individual differences in use of humor and their relation to psychological well-being: Development of the Humor Styles Questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality37: 48–75.
40.
MastersRD (1984) Ostracism, voice and exit: The biology of social participation. In: GruterMMastersRD (eds) Ostracism: A Social and Biological Phenomenon. Monterey, CA: Elsevier Press.
41.
MastersRD (1989) Gender and political cognition: Integrating evolutionary biology and political science. Politics and the Life Sciences8: 3–26.
42.
MastersRDCarlottiSJJr (1994) Gender differences in response to political leaders. In: EllisL (ed.) Social Stratification and Socioeconomic Inequality, Vol 2. Boulder, CO: Praeger, 13–35.
43.
MastersRDSullivanDG (1988) ‘Happy Warriors’: Leaders’ facial displays, viewers’ emotions, and political support. American Journal of Political Science32: 345–368.
44.
MastersRDSullivanDG (1989) Nonverbal displays and political leadership in France and the United States. Political Behavior11: 121–130.
45.
MastersRDSullivanDGLanzettaJTMcHugoGJEnglisBG (1986) The facial displays of leaders: Toward an ethology of human politics. Journal of Social and Biological Structures9: 319–343.
46.
MeyerJC (2000) Humor as a double-edged sword: Four functions of humor in communication. Communication Theory10: 310–331.
47.
MillerG (2009) Spent: Sex, Evolution, and Consumer Behavior. New York: Viking.
48.
MoroschanGHurdPLNicoladisE (2009) Sex differences in the use of indirect aggression in adult Canadians. Evolutionary Psychology7: 146–159.
49.
MorrisJSBaumgartnerJC (2007) The Daily Show and attitudes toward the news media. In: BaumgartnerJCMorrisJS (eds) Laughing Matters: Humor and American Politics in the Media Age. New York: Routledge, 315–331.
50.
MoyP (2007) The political effects of late night comedy and talk shows. In: BaumgartnerJCMorrisJS (eds) Laughing Matters: Humor and American Politics in the Media Age. New York: Routledge, 295–313.
51.
MutzDC (2007) Effects of ‘In-Your-Face’ television discourse on perceptions of legitimate opposition. American Political Science Review101: 621–635.
52.
NabiRLMoyer-GuséEByrneS (2007) All joking aside: A serious investigation into the persuasive effect of funny social issue messages. Communication Monographs74: 29–54.
53.
NivenDLichterSRAmundsonD (2003) The political content of late night comedy. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics8: 118–133.
54.
PaletzDL (1990) Political humor and authority: From support to subversion. International Political Science Review11: 483–493.
55.
PankseppJ (1998) Affective Neuroscience: The Foundation of Human and Animal Emotions. New York: Oxford University Press.
56.
PriestRF (1966) Election jokes: The effects of reference group membership. Psychological Reports18: 600–602.
57.
PriestRFAbrahamsJ (1970) Candidate preference and hostile humor in the 1968 elections. Psychological Report26: 779–783.
58.
PriestRFSwainJE (2002) Humor and its implications for leadership effectiveness. Humor15: 169–189.
59.
SalterFK (1995) Emotions in Command: A Naturalistic Study of Institutional Dominance. New York: Oxford University Press.
60.
SchiffenbauerASchiavoRS (1976) Physical distance and attraction: An intensification effect. Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology12: 274–282.
61.
SchutzCE (1977) Political Humor: From Aristophanes to Sam Ervin. Cranbury, NJ: Associated University Presses, Inc.
62.
SloaneAA (2001) Humor in the White House: The Wit of Five American Presidents. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company, Inc.
63.
SmithKLarimerCWLittvayLHibbingJR (2007) Evolutionary theory and political leadership: Why certain people do not trust decision makers. The Journal of Politics69: 285–299.
64.
SmithERSegerCRMackieDM (2007) Can emotions be truly group level? Evidence regarding four conceptual criteria. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology93: 431–446.
65.
SmithCVothB (2002) The role of humor in political argument: How ‘Strategery’ and ‘Lockboxes’ changed a political campaign. Argumentation and Advocacy39: 110–129.
66.
SomitAPetersonSA (1997) Darwinism, Dominance, and Democracy: The Biological Bases of Authoritarianism. Westport, CT: Praeger Press.
67.
SpeierH (1998) Wit and politics: An essay on laughter and power. American Journal of Sociology103(5): 1352–1401.
68.
SpoorJRKellyJR (2004) The evolutionary significance of affect in groups: Communication and group bonding. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations7: 398–412.
69.
StewartPA (2010 in press) Nonverbal punchline cues during the 2008 presidential primary debates. Politics and the Life Sciences29.
70.
StewartPA (forthcoming) Laughter on the campaign trail: How 2008 presidential candidates used humor during primary debates. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research.
71.
StormsMDThomasGC (1977) Reactions to physical closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology35: 412–418.
72.
SullivanDGMastersRD (1994) Biopolitics, the media, and leadership: Nonverbal cues, emotions, and trait attributions in the evaluation of leaders. In: SomitAPetersonSA (eds) Research in Biopolitics, Vol.2. New York: JAI Press, 237–273.
73.
SzameitatDPAlterKSzameitatAJ. (2009) Differentiation of emotions in laughter at the behavioral level. Emotion9: 397–405.
74.
TiedensLZFragaleAR (2003) Power moves: Complementarity in dominant and submissive nonverbal behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology84: 558–568.
75.
UdallMK (1988) Too Funny to be President. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
76.
VothB (2007) Saturday Night Live and presidential elections. In: BaumgartnerJCMorrisJS (eds) Laughing Matters: Humor and American Politics in the Media Age. New York: Routledge, 229–239.
77.
WatsonDClarkLATellegenA (1988) Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology54(6): 1063–1070.
78.
WeisfeldGE (1993) The adaptive value of humor and laughter. Ethology and Sociobiology14: 141–169.
79.
WeisfeldGENowakNTLucasT. (forthcoming) Do women seek humorousness in men because it signals intelligence? A cross-cultural test. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research.
80.
WickerFWBarronWLIIIWillisAC (1980) Disparagement humor: Dispositions and resolutions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology39: 701–709.
81.
YarwoodDL (2004) When Congress makes a joke: Congressional humor then and now. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
82.
YoungDG (2007) The Daily Show as the New Journalism: In Their Own Words. In: BaumgartnerJCMorrisJS (eds) Laughing Matters: Humor and American Politics in the Media Age. New York: Routledge, 241–259.
83.
YoungDG (2008) The privileged role of the late-night joke: Exploring humor’s role in disrupting argument scrutiny. Media Psychology11: 119–142.
84.
ZahaviAZahaviA (1997) The Handicap Principle: A Missing Piece of Darwin’s Puzzle. New York: Oxford University Press.
