The essay explores the adequacy of the `meme' concept to explain the basic mechanism of cultural evolution. Distin's defense of `memetics' is deficient because it is based on a flawed analogy with genetics. Although Richerson and Boyd's `cultural variant' is not based on a flawed analogy with genetics, their alternative appears primarily to be operant conditioning in disguise and presents no novel innovations in learning theory. Both models of gene—culture co-evolution are examples of one-sided cultural determinism with no genuine biological component. Analysis of the information metaphysics of memes and cultural variants reveals that both concepts are also committed to mind—body dualism.
Blackmore, S. (1999) The Meme Machine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2.
Bloch, M. (2000) `A Well-Disposed Social Anthropologist's Problem with Memes', in R. Aunger (ed.) Darwinizing Culture: The Status of Memetics as a Science, pp. 189—204. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3.
Churchland, P.M. and Churchland, P.S. (1998) On the Contrary: Critical Essays 1977—1987. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4.
Churchland, P.S. (1986) Neurophilosophy: Toward a Unified Understanding of the Mind-Brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5.
Cosmides, L. and Tooby, J. (1989) `Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture', Part II: `Case Study: A Computational Theory of Social Exchange ', Ethology and Sociobiology10: 51—97.
6.
Davidson, D. (1980) Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
7.
Dawkins, R. (1976) The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8.
Dawkins, R. (1982) The Extended Phenotype. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
9.
Dawkins, R. (1984) `Replicators, Consequences, and Displacement Activities ', Behavioral and Brain Sciences7(4): 486—7.
10.
Dawkins, R. (2003) A Devil's Chaplain. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
11.
Dennett, D. (1995) Darwin's Dangerous Idea. New York: Simon and Schuster.
12.
Distin, K. (2005) The Selfish Meme: A Critical Reappraisal. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
Donahoe, J. (1984) `Skinner — The Darwin of Ontogeny?', Behavioral and Brain Sciences7(4): 487—8.
14.
Feyerabend, P. (1963) `Materialism and the Mind—Body Problem', Review of Metaphysics17: 49—66.
15.
Fodor, J. (2000) The Mind Doesn't Work That Way: The Scope and Limits of Computational Psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16.
Globus, G. (1992) `Toward a Noncomputational Cognitive Neuroscience ', Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience4(2): 299—310.
17.
Geertz, C. (1973) The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.
18.
Geertz, C. (1980) `Sociosexology', The New York Review of Books, 14 January, pp. 1—2.
19.
Hallpike, C. (1986) The Principles of Social Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20.
Horgan, T. and Tye, M. (1986) `Against the Token Identity Theory', in E. LePore and B. McLaughlin (eds) Actions and Events: Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson, pp. 427—43. London: Basil Blackwell.
21.
Kim, J. ( 1986) `Psychophysical Laws', in E. LePore and B. McLaughlin (eds) Actions and Events: Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson, pp. 369—86. London: Basil Blackwell .
22.
Kitcher, P. (1989) `Proximate and Developmental Analysis', Behavioral and Brain Sciences12(1): 186—7.
23.
Lumsden, C. and Wilson, E.O. (1981) Genes, Minds, and Culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24.
McLaughlin, B. (1986) `Anomalous Monism and the Irreducibility of Mind ', in E. LePore and B. McLaughlin (eds) Actions and Events: Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson, pp. 331—68. London : Basil Blackwell.
25.
Oyama, S. (1985) The Ontogeny of Information. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26.
Pinker, S. (1997) How the Mind Works. New York : W.W. Norton.
27.
Quine, W.V.O. (1985) `States of Mind', Journal of Philosophy82(1): 5—8.
28.
Quine, W.V.O. (1987) Quiddities: An Intermittently Philosophical Dictionary . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29.
Quine, W.V.O. (1990) The Pursuit of Truth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30.
Richerson, P.J. and Boyd, R. (1976) `A Simple Dual Inheritance Model of the Conflict between Social and Biological Evolution', Zygon11(3): 254—62.
31.
Richerson, P.J. and Boyd, R. (2005) Not by Genes Alone: How Culture Transformed Human Evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32.
Sahlins, M. (1976) The Use and Abuse of Biology. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
33.
Searle, J. (1984) Minds, Brains and Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34.
Simon, H. (1962) `The Architecture of Complexity', Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society106(6): 467—82.
35.
Skinner, B.F. (1953) Science and Human Behavior. New York: Macmillan.
36.
Skinner, B.F. (1977) `Why I am not a Cognitive Psychologist', Behaviorism5: 1—11.
37.
Skinner, B.F. (1984a) `Selection by Consequences', Behavioral and Brain Sciences7(4): 477—81. (orig. paper pub. 1966)
38.
Skinner, B.F. (1984b) `Some Consequences of Selection', Behavioral and Brain Sciences7(4): 502—10.
39.
Smolensky, P. (1988) `On the Proper Treatment of Connectionsim', Behavioral and Brain Sciences11(1): 1—74.
40.
Sperber, D. (1996) Explaining Culture: A Naturalistic Approach. London: Blackwell.
41.
Sterelny, K. and Griffiths, P. (1999) Sex and Death: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Biology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
42.
Uttal, W. (2004) Dualism: The Original Sin of Cognitivism. Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum.
43.
Uttal, W. (2005) Neural Theories of Mind: Why the Mind—Brain Problem May Never be Solved. Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum.
