Various theories that purport to explain the relationship between incest taboos and exogamous marriage customs are reviewed. These include sociological, psychological, and sociobiological approaches. Each of these approaches poses challenges not easily addressed by its competitors and yet no satisfactory synthesis seems available given the currently existing explanatory paradigms. It is argued here that exogamy is not a simple outgrowth of incest taboos and incest taboos are not a simple extenuation of inbreeding avoidance. Relationships between the sociobiology of inbreeding avoidance and social institutions such as exogamy and incest taboos are recast with the help of evolutionary psychology, which provides additional tools with which to approach this complex and contradictory set of interlocking problems.
Alexander, R. (1979) Darwinism and Human Affairs. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
2.
Barash, D. (1977) Sociobiology and Behavior. New York: Elsevier.
3.
Buss, D. (1988) “From Vigilance to Violence: Mate Guarding Tactics”, Ethology and Sociobiology9: 291-317.
4.
Buss, D. (1989) “Sex Differences in Human Mate Preferences: Evolutionary Hypotheses Tested in 37 Cultures”, Behavioral and Brain Sciences12: 1-49.
5.
Buss, D. (1991) “Evolutionary Personality Psychology”, Annual Review of Psychology42: 459-491.
6.
Carpenter, C. (1934) “A Field Study of the Behavior and Social Relations of Howling Monkeys”, Comparative Psychology Monographs10.
7.
Chagnon, N.A. (1992) Yanomamo: Last Days of Eden. New York: Harcourt and Brace.
8.
Daly, M. , Wilson, M. and Weghorst, S. (1982) “Male Sexual Jealousy”, Ethology and Sociobiology3: 11-27.
9.
DeMarest, W.J. (1983) “Does Familiarity Necessarily Lead to Erotic Indifference and Incest Avoidance because Inbreeding Lowers Reproductive Fitness?”, Behavioral and Brain Sciences6: 106-107.
10.
Fox, J.R. (1962) “Sibling Incest”, British Journal of Sociology13: 128-150.
11.
Fox, R. (1967) Kinship and Marriage. London: Penguin Books.
12.
Fox, R. (1980) The Red Lamp of Incest. New York: Dutton.
13.
Freud, S. (1955[1913]) Totem and Taboo, 13th edn.London: Hogarth Press.
14.
Gould, S.J. and Lewontin, R.C. (1979) “The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm”, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London (Series B): 205, 581-598.
15.
Knight, Chris (1991) Blood Relations: Menstruation and the Origins of Culture. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
16.
Korn, F. (1973) Elementary Structures Reconsidered. Berkeley: University of California Press.
17.
Leach, E. (1970) Claude Lévi-Strauss. New York: Viking.
18.
Lévi-Strauss, C. (1969[1949]) The Elementary Structures of Kinship. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
19.
(Originally published in Revue de l'Histoire des Religions129: 84-100, 1945.)
20.
May, R.M. (1979) “When to Be Incestuous”, Nature279: 192-194.
21.
Parsons, T. (1954) “The Incest Taboo in Relation to Social Structure and the Socialization of the Child”, British Journal of Sociology5: 101-117.
22.
Pusey, A. (1980) “Inbreeding Avoidance in Chimpanzees”, Animal Behaviour28: 543-552.
23.
Shepher, J. (1971) “Mate Selection among Second-Generation Kibbutz Adolescents and Adults: Incest Avoidance and Negative Imprinting”, Archives of Sexual Behavior1: 293-307.
24.
Shepher, J. (1983) Incest: A Biosocial View. New York: Academic Press.
25.
Slater, M.K. (1959) “Ecological Factors in the Origin of Incest”, American Anthropologist61: 1042-1059.
26.
Steklis, H.D. and Walter, A. (1992) “Culture, Biology, and Human Behavior: A Mechanistic Approach”, Human Nature2: 137-169.
27.
Symons, D. (1989) “A Critique of Darwinian Anthropology”, Ethology and Sociobiology10: 131-144.
28.
Thornhill, N. (1991) “An Evolutionary Analysis of Rules Regulating Human Inbreeding and Marriage”, Behavioral and Brain Sciences14: 205-246.
29.
Tooby, J. and Cosmides, L. (1990) “The Past Explains the Present. Emotional Adaptations and the Structure of Ancestral Environments”, Ethology and Sociobiology11: 375-424.
30.
Tylor, E.B. (1888) “On a Method of Investigating the Development of Institutions; Applied to Laws of Marriage and Descent”, Journal of the Anthropological Institute18: 245-269.
31.
Van den Berghe, P. (1983) “Human Inbreeding Avoidance: Culture in Nature”, Behavioral and Brain Sciences6: 91-102.
32.
Vayda, A.P. (1995) “Failures of Explanation in Darwinian Ecological Anthropology: Part `”, Philosophy of the Social Sciences25(2): 219-245.
33.
Walter, A. (1990) “Putting Freud and Westermarck in their Places”, Ethos18: 439-444.
34.
Walter, A. (1997) “The Evolutionary Psychology of Mate Selection in Morocco: A Multivariate Analysis”, Human Nature8(2): 113-137.
35.
Walter, A. and Buyske, S. (in preparation) “Modeling the Westermarck Effect and Mate Choice in Morocco: An Approach using Logistic Regression”.
36.
Westermarck, E. (1926[1891]) A Short History of Marriage. New York: Macmillan.
37.
White, L. (1948) “The Definition and Prohibition of Incest”, American Anthropologist50: 416-435.
38.
White, L. (1949) Science and Culture. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
39.
Wilson, E.O. (1975) Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press/Belknap Press.
40.
Wilson, E.O. (1997) Consilience. New York: Alfred Knopf.
41.
Wolf, A. (1970) “Childhood Association and Sexual Attraction: A Further Look at the Westermarck Hypothesis”, American Anthropologist72: 503-508.
42.
Wolf, A. (1995) Sexual Attraction and Childhood Association: A Chinese Brief for Westermarck. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
43.
Wolf, A. and Huang, C. (1980) Marriage and Adoption in China: 1845-1945. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
44.
Wrangham, R. (1980) “An Ecological Model of Female-bonded Primate Groups”, Behaviour75: 269-299.
