This article argues that from a Group-analytic perspective, the communication dynamics of the Internet are similar to those of any large group. Personal experiences are recounted, showing how the Internet can enable a large group of 450 members to function effectively. Drawing on Kreeger's seminal work on the large group, comparison is made between the `Internet forum' and the extended matrix, questioning Foulkes's scepticism as to the possibility of ever realizing a healthy, functioning large group. The writer looks towards the increasing use and applications of the Internet as one of the most important contemporary issues in group analysis.
Appleton, R. (1997a) Subject: Users of the service; Date: Thurs. 12 June 1997, 19:16:16-)400 (EDT); From: Rappleton@aol.com; Sender: psychiatric-nursing-request@mailbase.ac.uk
2.
Barker, P.
and Davidson, B. (1997) Psychiatric Nursing: Ethical Strife. London: Edward Arnold.
3.
Bowers, L.
(1997a) `Constructing International Professional Identity: What Psychiatric Nurses Talk About on the Internet', International Journal of Nursing Studies34(3): 208-212.
4.
Bowers, L. (1997b) Subject: Re: Sociology; Date: Tues. 11 March 1997, 19:39:20 +0000; From: Len@lenbow.demon.co.uk; Sender: psychiatric-nursing-request@ mailbase.ac.uk
5.
Curzon, B. (1997) Subject: Re: Internet Addiction Disorder; Date: Thurs. 20 March 1997, 15:01:22 +1300; From: ajmac@iconz.co.nz (Brenda and Tony MacCulloch); Sender: psychiatric-nursing-request@mailbase.ac.uk
6.
Davidson, B. (1997a) Subject: Inappropriate use of the list; Date: Weds. 12 March 1997, 14:47:26-0500; From: Ben_Davidson@compuserve.com; Sender: psychiatric-nursing-request@mailbase.ac.uk
7.
Davidson, B. (1997b) Subject: Users of the service; Date: Fri. 13 June 1997, 19:58:00-0400; From: Ben_Davidson@compuserve.com; Sender: psychiatric-nursing-request@mailbase.ac.uk
8.
Davidson, B.
(1998a) `Dissent', pp. 115-134 in P. Barker and B. Davidson (eds) Psychiatric Nursing: Ethical Strife, London: Edward Arnold.
9.
Davidson, B.
(1998b) `Psychiatric Nursing in Cyberspace', Mental Health Practice1(7): 25-29.
10.
De Mare, P.
(1975) `The Politics of Large Groups', in L. Kreeger (ed.) The Large Group: Dynamics and Therapy. London: Karnac.
11.
Foulkes, S.H.
(1964) Therapeutic Group Analysis. London: Maresfield.
12.
Foulkes, S.H.
(1975a) Group-analytic Psychotherapy: Method and Principles. London: Maresfield.
13.
Foulkes, S.H.
(1975b) `Problems of the Large Group from a Group-analytic Point of View,' in L. Kreeger (ed.) The Large Group: Dynamics and Therapy. London: Karnac.
14.
Garland, C.
(1982) `Group Analysis: Taking the Non-Problem Seriously', Group Analysis15(1): 4-14.
Johnson, M. (1997) Subject: Re: Inappropriate use of the mail list; Date: Thurs. 13 March 1997, 19:14:56 +1000; From: m.johnson@cqu.edu.au (Matthew Johnson); Sender: psychiatric-nursing-request@mailbase.ac.uk
17.
McLuhan, M.
and Fiore, Q. (1967) The Medium is the Massage. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
18.
Kreeger, L.
(ed.) (1994) The Large Group: Dynamics and Therapy. London: Karnac.
19.
Roitman, M.
(1989) `The Concept of Projective Identification: Its Use in Understanding Interpersonal and Group Processes', Group Analysis22: 235-248.
20.
Smail, D.
(1984) Illusion and Reality: The Meaning of Anxiety. London: Dent.
21.
Smail, D.
(1987) Taking Care — An Alternative to Therapy. London: Dent.
22.
Thomas, C. (1997) Subject: Re: Love you; Date: Thurs. 13 March 1997, 20:50: 34-0500; From: Carol S. Thomas <csthom@one.net>; Sender: psychiatric-nursing-request@mailbase.ac.uk
23.
Turquet, P.
(1975) `Threats to Identity in the Large Group', pp. 87-144 in L. Kreeger (ed.) The Large Group: Dynamics and Therapy. London: Karnac.
24.
Wolsey, P. (1997) Subject: Re: Part 2 — User Employment Project Report; Date: Weds. 25 June 1997, 12:07:19 +0100; From: Philip Wolsey<opdc@opdc.co.uk>; Sender: psychiatric-nursing-request@mailbase.ac.uk
25.
Yalom, I.
(1985) The Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy, 3rd edn.New York: Basic Books.
