This paper describes how a Large Group functions in a block weekend Group-analytic training course through the phases of Introductory, Advanced and Diploma years. The author suggests that the Large Group is strategically placed in such a course to assist with the integration of complex personal changes occurring in the course events, culminating in the professional identity of the group analyst.
Abercrombie, M.L.J.
and Terry, P.M. (1979) `Students' Attitudes to Professionalism as Seen in Group Discussion', in J. Nias (ed.) The Human Nature of Learning — Selections from the Work of M.L.J. Abercrombie, pp. 112-114. Buckingham: Open University Press.
2.
Balmer, R.
(1993) `Therapeutic Factors in Group Analysis: Meeting Them in the Block Training Setting. Group Analysis26(2): 139-145.
3.
Cox, M.
and Theilgaard, A. (1987) Mutative Metaphors in Psychotherapy. London: Tavistock.
4.
de Maré, P.
. Piper, R. and Thompson, S. (1991) Koinonia. From Hate through Dialogue, to Culture in the Large Group. London: Karnac.
5.
Dick, B.
(1993) `The Group Matrix as a Holomovement and Quantum Field'. Group Analysis26(4): 469-480.
6.
Foulkes. S.H.
(1971) Access to Unconscious Processes in the Group-analytic Group', Group Analysis4(1): 4-14.
7.
Hearst, L.E.
(1993) `Discussion on Papers by Yannis Tsegos, Rudolph Balmer, Mario Marrone and Herta Reik', Group Analysis26(2): 163-168.
8.
Kakouri. A
and Tsegos, I.K. (1993) `Boundaries and Barriers in Peer Supervision'. Paper given at Ninth European Symposium in Group Analysis, Heidelberg.
9.
Lear, T.E.
(1991) `Personal Transformations in the Group'. Group Analysis24(4): 441-454.
10.
Powell. A
(1993) `The Psychophysical Matrix and Group Analysis', Group Analysis26(4): 449-468.
11.
Reik. H.`The Creative Capacity of Boundaries within the Block Training Experience'
, Group Analysis26(2): 157-161.
12.
Thackeray. W.
(1847) Vanity Fair. Reprinted Harmondworth: Penguin. 1987.
