Emma Reicher’s article is stimulating and highly complex and fills a gap in the literature on large groups. It is unusual in studying the large group experience from the perspective of a participant, and it also reviews the literature and poses a number of fundamental questions on this practice. The present reviewer has chosen to comment on and discuss three of them: i) who does the large group experience belong to?; ii) the influence of psychoanalysis on the large group practice and theory; and iii) essentialism and contextualism in the conception of the human being. In her conclusion, the author compares two metaphors for the large group, a mountain and a river, and opts for the latter. The image of the river clearly depicts the fluid nature of the large group as a process, which must be experienced in order to be known.
BatesonG (1972) Steps to an Ecology of Mind. New York, NY: Ballantine.
2.
BlegerJ (1967) Symbiosis and ambiguity: A psychoanalytic study. Hove, East Sussex: Routledge, 2013.
3.
BlegerJ (1971) Temas de psicología. Entrevista y grupos [Psychological themes: The interview and groups]. Buenos Aires: Nueva Visión.
4.
de MaréP (1985) Large group perspectives. Group Analysis18(2): 79–92.
5.
FerencziS (1924) Thalassa: A Theory of Genitality. London: Routledge, 2019.
6.
FoulkesSH (1952) Similarities and differences between psycho-analytic principles and group-analytic principles. In: Foulkes (1964) Therapeutic Group Analysis. London: Routledge, 2018, pp. 93–100.
7.
FoulkesSH (1959) Psycho-analysis, group psychotherapy, group analysis. In: Foulkes (1964) Therapeutic Group Analysis. London: Routledge, 2018, pp. 120–130.
8.
FoulkesSH (1971) Access to unconscious processes in the group-analytic group. In: Foulkes (1990), Selected Papers: Psychoanalysis and Group Analysis. London: Routledge, 2018, pp. 209–221.
9.
FoulkesSH (1973) The group as matrix of the individual’s mental life. In: Foulkes (1990), Selected Papers: Psychoanalysis and Group Analysis. London: Routledge, 2018, pp. 223–233.
10.
FoulkesSH (1975) Problems of the large group from a group-analytic point of view. In: KreegerL (ed.) The Large Group: Dynamics and Therapy, pp. 33–56.
11.
FoulkesSHAnthonyEJ (1965) Group Psychotherapy: The Psychoanalytic Approach, second edition. London: Routledge, 2019.
12.
FreudS (1900a) The Interpretation of Dreams. S.E. 4–5. London: Hogarth.
13.
FreudS (1917a) A difficulty in the path of psycho-analysis. S.E. 17: 135–144. London: Hogarth.
14.
LoewaldHW (1951) Ego and reality. The International Journal of Psycho-Analysis32: 10–18.
15.
MahlerM (1968) On Human Symbiosis and the Vicissitudes of Individuation. Vol I: Infantile Psychosis. New York, NY: International Universities Press.
16.
MontevechioB (1999) Las nuevas fronteras del psicoanálisis. Dionisio, Narciso, Edipo [The new frontiers of psychoanalysis: Dionysus, Narcissus, Oedipus]. Buenos Aires: Lumen.
17.
MontevechioB (2002) Más allá de Narciso. La problemática de las identidades [Beyond Narcissus: The problematic of identities]. Buenos Aires: Lumen.
18.
Pichon-RivièreE (1971) El proceso grupal. Del psicoanálisis a la psicología social (I) [The group process: From psychoanalysis to social psychology (I)]. Buenos Aires: Nueva Visión.
19.
Pichon-RivièreE (1979) Teoría del vínculo [Theory of the bond]. Buenos Aires: Nueva Visión.
20.
ReicherE (2021) Approaching the mountain: A journey into the wilderness of large group thinking. Group Analysis54(1): 3–18.
21.
SegallaE (2015) Relational experiences in large group. A therapeutic and training challenge. In: Grossmark and Wright F (eds.), The One and the Many: Relational Approaches to Group Psychotherapy. London: Routledge, pp. 242–262.
22.
Tubert-OklanderJ (2011) Enrique Pichon-Rivière: the social unconscious in the Latin-American tradition of group analysis. In: HopperEWeinbergH (eds) The Social Unconscious in Persons, Groups and Societies—Volume 1: Mainly Theory. London: Routledge, 2018, pp. 45–67.
23.
Tubert-OklanderJ (2014) The One and the Many: Relational Psychoanalysis and Group Analysis. London: Routledge, 2019.
24.
Tubert-OklanderJ (2017) The inner organization of the matrix. In: Hopper and Weinberg (eds) The Social Unconscious in Persons, Groups and Societies— Volume 3: The Foundation Matrix Extended and Re-configured. London: Routledge, 2019, pp. 65–85.
25.
Tubert-OklanderJ (2019a) Ferenczi and group analysis. Group Analysis52(1): 23–35.
26.
Tubert-OklanderJ (2019b) Beyond psychoanalysis and group analysis. The urgent need for a new paradigm of the human being. Group Analysis52(4): 409–426.
27.
Tubert-OklanderJHernández de TubertR (2004) Operative Groups: The Latin-American Approach to Group Analysis. London: Jessica Kingsley.
28.
Tubert-OklanderJHernández-TubertR (2011) A conversation with Malcolm Pines: Part Two. Group Analysis44(1): 3–26.
29.
von Sommaruga HowardT (2012) To stand sitting! Bi-cultural dilemmas in a large group in Aotearoa New Zealand. Group Analysis45(2): 219–243.
30.
WeinbergHSchneiderS (2007) Ethical considerations in the large group. Group31(3): 215–228.
