Abstract
For the Twenty-fifth Anniversary of Group Analysis it seemed a good idea to interview some of the Editorial Committee. I talked to them one at a time, in a free-floating fashion, looking for personal impressions as well as for data. But later it struck me that their responses corresponded with each other, as if they had all been present at the same time in a group, with a stack of journals in the middle.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.