A walk into the men’s room. A response to Sue Einhorn’s 44th Foulkes Lecture

Abstract

Keywords

patriarchy misogyny psychoanalysis group analysis gender studies

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Benjamin

(1988) The Bonds of Love. New York: Pantheon.

Butler

(1990) Gender Trouble. New York: Routledge.

Dimen

(2003) Sexuality, Intimacy and Power. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.

Einhorn

(2021) From a woman’s point of view. How internalized misogyny affects relationships between women [44th Annual Foulkes Lecture]. Group Analysis 54(4): 481–498.

Elise

(2002) The primary maternal oedipal situation and female homoerotic desire. Psychoanalytic Inquiry 22(2): 209–228.

Harris

(2009) Gender as Soft Assembly. New York: Routledge.

Hopper

(2003) The Social Unconscious: Selected Papers. London: Jessica Kingsley.

Irigaray

(1985) The Speculum of the Other Women. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Kristeva

(1980) Desire in Language. New York: Columbia University Press.

10.

Laplanche

(1989) New Foundations for Psychoanalysis. London: Blackwell.

11.

Levine

(2019) A group analyst’s perspective on the Trump–Clinton election and aftermath. International journal of group psychotherapy 69(2): 192–220.

12.

Rogers

(2016) White women helped to elect Donald Trump. New York Times, 9 November.

13.

Stein

(2005) Why perversion? False love and perverse pact. International Journal of Psychoanalysis 86(3): 775–779.