A group-analytic perspective is taken on the dynamic interplay of intrapsychic and interpersonal processes in human group interaction. Any strict individual/group juxtaposition is seen as false dichotomy and potential `pseudo-problem'. The interactional context is used to characterize group analysis as a new paradigm in psychoanalytic theory. A concept of the group in the individual is discussed with theoretical and clinical applications.
Ahlin, G.
(1995) `The Interpersonal World of the Infant and the Foundation Matrix for Groups and Networks of the Person', Group Analysis28(1): 5-20.
2.
Brown, D.
and Zinkin, L. (1994) `Introduction', in D. Brown and L. Zinkin (eds) The Psyche and the Social World. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
3.
Dalal, F.
(1998) Taking the Group Seriously. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
4.
Dalal, F.
(2001) `The Social Unconscious: A Post-Foulkesian Perspective', Group Analysis34(4): 539-555.
5.
Foulkes, E.
(1990) `S.H. Foulkes: A Brief Memoir', in E. Foulkes (ed.) S.H. Foulkes, Selected Papers. London: Karnac Books.
6.
Foulkes, S.H.
(1964) Therapeutic Group Analysis. London: George Allen and Unwin.
7.
Foulkes, S.H.
(1966) `Some Basic Concepts in Group Psychotherapy', in E. Foulkes (ed.) S.H. Foulkes, Selected Papers. London: Karnac Books.
8.
Foulkes, S.H.
(1971) `The Group as Matrix of the Individual's Mental Life', in E. Foulkes (ed.) S.H. Foulkes, Selected Papers. London: Karnac Books.
9.
Foulkes, S.H.
(1974) `My Philosophy in Psychotherapy', in E. Foulkes (ed.) S.H. Foulkes, Selected Papers. London: Karnac Books.
10.
Foulkes, S.H.
and Anthony, E.J. (1957) Group Psychotherapy: The Psychoanalytic Approach. London: Karnac Books.
11.
Freud, S.
(1921) `Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego'. Standard Edition, Vol. 18, pp. 67-144. London: Hogarth Press.
12.
Leal, M.R.M.
(1983) `Why Group Analysis Works?, in M. Pines (ed.) The Evolution of Group Analysis. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
13.
Lichtenberg, J. D. (ed.) (1982) `Infant Research: The Dawn of Awareness', Psychoanalytic Enquiry1(4).
14.
Lichtenberg, J.D.
(1983) Psychoanalysis and Infant Research. Hillsdale, NJ: The Psychoanalytic Press.
15.
Nitsun, M.
(1996) The Atti-Grolup: Destructive Forces in the Group and their Therapeutic Potential. London: Routledge.
16.
Nitsun, M.
(2001) `Towards a Group-Analytic Approach to Individual Psychotherapy', Group Analysis34(4): 473-483.
17.
Pines, M.
(1994) `The Group-as-a-Whole', in D. Brown and L. Zinkin (eds) The Psyche and the Social World. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
18.
Pines, M.
(1998) Circular Reflections. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
19.
Scheidlinger, S.
(1983) `Individual and Group Psychology - Are They Opposed?' in M. Pines (ed.) The Evolution of Group Analysis. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
20.
Stacey, R.
(2001a) `Complexity and the Group Matrix', Group Analysis34(2): 221-239.
21.
Stacey, R.
(2001b) `What Can it Mean to Say that the Individual is Social Through and Through?', Group Analysis34(4): 457-471.
22.
Stern, D.N.
(1998) The Interpersonal World of the Infant. London: Karnac Books.
23.
Zinkin, L.
(1994) `Exchange as a Therapeutic Factor in Group Analysis', in D. Brown and L. Zinkin (eds) The Psyche and the Social World. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
