This study explores the applicability of the American Group Psychotherapy Association’s (AGPA) Practice Guidelines for Group Psychotherapy to analyse the construction of group processes in three focus groups with patients, clinicians, and administrators on cultural competence. Each focus group was recorded, transcribed, and analysed through codes developed from the AGPA’s Guidelines. Findings were compared and contrasted to discover thematic convergences and divergences. Our results show that certain processes such as catharsis, imparting information, and universality emerged commonly across all three focus groups, but with different frequencies. Group processes influenced how participants interacted and influenced each other in their responses, suggesting the value of analysing group processes in multicultural focus groups.
AggarwalNK (2011) Inter-subjectivity, Transference, and the Cultural Third. Contemporary Psychoanalysis47(2): 204–223.
2.
American Group Psychotherapy Association (2007) Practice guidelines for group psychotherapy. New York: American Group Psychotherapy Association.
3.
BrownD (1992) Transcultural group analysis ii. use and abuse of cultural differences: analysis and ethics. Group Analysis25(1): 97–105.
4.
BullonA (2013) Learning by teaching an unsuccessful ‘cultural sensitivity’ course. Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry37(2): 280–287.
5.
CareyMASmithMW (1994) Capturing the group effect in focus groups: a special concern in analysis. Qualitative Health Research4(1): 123–127.
6.
CarlsenBGlentonC (2011) What about n? A methodological study of sample-size reporting in focus group studies. BMC Medical Research Methodology11(1): 26.
7.
EloSKyngäsH (2008) The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing62(1): 107–115.
8.
Heenen-WolffSKnaussW (1991) Change of culture as an opportunity for reorganizing psychological conflicts: a group-analytic experience with immigrants. Group Analysis24(3): 231–240.
9.
HueySJJrTilleyJLJonesEOSmithCA (2014) The contribution of cultural competence to evidence-based care for ethnically diverse populations. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology10: 305–338.
10.
HsiehHFShannonSE (2005) Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research15(9): 1277–1288.
11.
JensenDRAbbottMKBeecherMEGrinerDGolightlyTRCannonJA (2012) Taking the pulse of the group: the utilization of practice-based evidence in group psychotherapy. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice43(4): 388–394.
12.
KirmayerLJGroleauDGuzderJBlakeCJarvisE (2006) Cultural consultation: a model of mental health service for multicultural societies. Focus4(3): 145–153.
13.
KitzingerJ (1994) The methodology of focus groups: the importance of interaction between research participants. Sociology of Health and Illness16(1): 103–121.
14.
KitzingerJ (1995) Qualitative research: introducing focus groups. British Medical Journal311(7000): 299–302.
15.
KrippendorffK (2012) Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
16.
MorganDL (1996) Focus groups. Annual Review of Sociology22(1): 129–152.
17.
MorganDL (2010) Reconsidering the role of interaction in analysing and reporting focus groups. Qualitative Health Research20(5): 718–722.
Morrison-BeedyDCȏté-ArsenaultDFeinsteinNF (2001) Maximizing results with focus groups: moderator and analysis issues. Applied Nursing Research14(1): 48–53.
20.
MorseJM (1995) The significance of saturation. Qualitative Health Research5(2): 147–149.
21.
Office of Minority Health (2013) National Standards for Culturally and Linguistically Appropriate Services in health and health care: A blueprint for advancing and sustaining CLAS policy and practice. Rockville: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
22.
PowellRASingleHM (1996) Focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care8(5): 499–504.
23.
PuskarKRMazzaGSlivkaCWestcottMCampbellFGiannone McFaddenT (2012) Understanding content and process: guidelines for group leaders. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care48(4): 225–229.
24.
RenzahoAMNRomiosPCrockCSønderlundAL (2013) The effectiveness of cultural competence programs in ethnic minority patient-centred health care—a systematic review of the literature. International Journal for Quality in Health Care25(3): 261–269.
25.
StraussALCorbinJ (1998) Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd edition). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
26.
Van de VenAHDelbecqAL (1974) The effectiveness of nominal, delphi, and interacting group decision making processes. Academy of Management Journal17(4): 605–621.
27.
WeinbergH (2003) The culture of the group and groups from different cultures. Group Analysis36(2): 253–268.
28.
WillenSS (2013) Confronting a ‘big huge gaping wound’: emotion and anxiety in a cultural sensitivity course for psychiatry residents. Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry37(2): 253–279.
29.
WillenSSBullonAGoodMJD (2010) Opening up a huge can of worms: reflections on a ‘cultural sensitivity’ course for psychiatry residents. Harvard Review of Psychiatry18(4): 247–253.
30.
YalomIDLeszczM (2005) Theory and practice of group psychotherapy. New York: Basic Books.
