The world is awash with new technologies, increasing migration, and ever-expanding methods of communication—all of which are reflected in and around the groups we conduct. This article charts the evolution of Foulkes’ group matrix before critically examining the notion of a foundation matrix in order to address the relevance of a concept that was created when the world seemed to move at a much slower pace. A development is offered that attempts to incorporate the dynamic and evolving world in which we live, harnessing difference within the matrix for transformational change.
FoguelBS (1994) The Group Experienced as Mother: Early Psychic Structures in Analytic Groups. Group Analysis27(3): 265–85.
10.
FoulkesSH (1948) Introduction to Group-Analytic Psychotherapy. London: Karnac.
11.
FoulkesSH (1964) Therapeutic Group Analysis. London: George Allen and Unwin.
12.
FoulkesSH (1975) Group Analytic Psychotherapy Methods and Principles. UK: Gordon and Breach, London: Karnac.
13.
FoulkesSH (1990) Selected Papers—Psychoanalysis and Group Analysis. London: Karnac.
14.
FoulkesSHAnthonyEJ (1965) Group Psychotherapy—the psychoanalytic approach, Second Edition. London: Karnac.
15.
FrommE (1962) Beyond the Chains of Illusion: My Encounter with Marx and Freud. New York: Continuum, 2001.
16.
HopperE (2001) The Social Unconscious: Theoretical Considerations. Group Analysis34(1): 9–27.
17.
Hopper (2003) The Social Unconscious: Selected Papers. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
18.
HopperEWeinbergH (2011) The Social Unconscious in Persons, Groups and Societies Volume 1: Mainly Theory. London: Karnac.
19.
HopperEWeinbergH (2016) The Social Unconscious in Persons, Groups, and Societies: Volume 2: Mainly Foundation Matrices. London: Karnac.
20.
HopperEWeinbergH (2017) The Social Unconscious in Persons, Groups, and Societies: Volume 3: The Foundation Matrix Extended and Re-configured. London: Karnac.
21.
HutchinsonS (2017) The Times They Are A-Changing: Evolving Group Analytic Identity. Group Analysis50(4): 419–435.
22.
JamesC (1984) Bion’s ‘Containing’ and Winnicott’s ‘Holding’ in the Context of the Group Matrix. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy34(2): 201–213.
23.
LealMRM (1983) Why group analysis works. In: PinesM (ed.) The Evolution of Group Analysis. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp.183–195.
24.
Le RoyJ (1994) Group Analysis and Culture. In: BrownDZinkinL (eds) The Psyche and the Social World: Developments in Group-Analytic Theory. London: Routledge, pp.180–201.
ProdgersA (1990) The Dual Nature of the Group as Mother: the Uroboric Container. Group Analysis13(1): 17–30.
27.
RobertsJP (1982) Foulkes’ Concept of the Matrix. Group Analysis15: 111–127.
28.
SchlapoberskyJR (2016) From the Couch to the Circle—Group Analytic Psychotherapy in Practice. Oxon: Routledge.
29.
StaceyR (2001) Complexity and the Group Matrix. Group Analysis34(2): 221–239.
30.
WeinbergH (2007) So What Is This Social Unconscious Anyway?Group Analysis40(3): 307–322.
31.
WinnicottDW (1960) The theory of the parent-infant relationship. In: The Maturational Processes and the Facilitating Environment. London: Tavistock/Hogarth Press, 1965.
32.
WottonL (2012) Between the Notes: A Musical Understanding of Change in Group Analysis. Group Analysis46(1): 48–60.
33.
ZinkinL (1989a) A Gnostic View of Group Therapy. Group Analysis22(2): 201–217.
