The transmission of group-analytic ideas and practices can be a breeding ground for creative growth or rigidification. This article will explore how our theoretical base and practice traditions have adapted to challenges from within-group analysis and from the wider socio-political field. Radical social change, shaped by revolutionary developments in communications technology, presents our theory and practice with further challenges to adapt. Some suggestions will be made as to the way forward.
AikenM. (2016) The Cyber Effect. London: John Murray.
2.
BatemenA.FonageyP. (2006) Mentalization-Based Treatment for Borderline Personality Disorder. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3.
BlackwellD. (2014) ‘Response to Elisabeth Rohr’s Foulkes Lecture’, Group Analysis47(4): 384–91.
4.
BrownD.G. (1987b) ‘Context, Content and Process: Inter-relationships between Small and Large Groups in a Transcultural Workshop’, Group Analysis20(3): 237–48.
5.
BrownD.G.ZinkinL. (eds) (1994) The Psyche and the Social World: Developments in Group-Analytic Theory. London: Routledge.
6.
CarrN. (2010) The Shadows: How the Internet is Changing the Way we Think, Read and Remember. London: Atlantic Books.
7.
DalalF. (1998) Taking the Group Seriously: Towards a Post-Foulkesian Group Analysis. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
8.
DylanB. (1964) The Times They Are a-Changin’. Columbia Records.
9.
EriksonE.H. (1968) Identity, Youth and Crisis. London: Faber and Faber.
10.
FoulkesS.H. (1948) Introduction to Group-Analytic Psychotherapy. Reprinted London: Karnac, 1983.
11.
FoulkesS.H. (1964) ‘Psychotherapy in the Sixties’, Chapter XI in Therapeutic Group Analysis London, pp. 135–54: Allen and Unwin.
12.
FoulkesS.H. (1975) Group-Analytic Psychotherapy: Method and Principles. London: Gordon and Breach. Reprinted London: Karnac, 1986.
13.
FriedmanR. (2014) ‘Group Analysis Today – Developments in Intersubjectivity’, Group Analysis47(3) 194–200.
14.
GreenfieldS. (2014) Mind Change: How Digital Technologies are Leaving their Mark on our Brain. London: Penguin Random House.
15.
HarariY.N. (2016) Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow. London: Penguin Random House.
16.
HebbD.O. (1949) The Organization of Behaviour: A Neuropsychological Theory. New York: Wiley.
17.
HopperE. (2003) The Social Unconscious: Selected Papers. London: Jessica Kingsley.
18.
HopperE.WeinbergH. (eds) (2011) The Social Unconscious in Persons, Groups, and Societies: Volume 1: Mainly Theory. London: Karnac.
19.
HopperE.WeinbergH. (eds) (2016) The Social Unconscious in Persons, Groups, and Societies: Volume 2: Mainly Foundation Matrices. London: Karnac.
20.
HutchinsonS. (2012) ‘Group Analysis in a Changing World: Therapeutic Authority in the Age of the Internet and Evidence-based Practice’, Unpublished Annual Barbara Dick Memorial Lecture. Manchester, UK.
21.
HutchinsonS. (2016) ‘Intimitats – und Zugehorigkeitsmuster im Wandel: Implikationen fur die Gruppenanalyse’ [Changing Patterns of Intimacy and Belonging: Implications for Group Analysis], Gruppenpsychotherapie und Gruppendynamik4: 264–78.
22.
LavieJ. (2011) ‘The Lost Roots of the Theory of Group Analysis: ‘interrelational individuals’ or ‘persons’, Chapter 7 in HopperE.WeinbergH. (eds) The Social Unconscious in Persons, Groups, and Societies: Volume 1: Mainly Theory. London: Karnac.
23.
MellucciA. (1995) The Process of Collective Identity. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
24.
MojovicM. (2016) ‘Serbian Reflective Citizens Matrix Flourishing in Leaking Containers. Response to 40th Foulkes Lecture’, Group Analysis49(4): 370–84.
25.
NitzgenD. (2011) ‘The Concept of the Social Unconscious in the Work of S.H. Foulkes’, Chapter 1 in HopperE.WeinbergH. (eds) The Social Unconscious in Persons, Groups, and Societies: Volume 1: Mainly Theory. London: Karnac.
26.
NitsunM. (1996) The Anti-group: Destructive Forces in the Group and their Creative Potential. London: Routledge.
27.
NitsunM. (2009) ‘Authority and Revolt: The Challenges to Group Leadership [33rd Foulkes Annual Lecture]’, Group Analysis42(4) 1–23.
28.
NitsunM. (2015) Beyond the Anti-Group: Survival and Transformation. London: Routledge.
29.
RohrE. (2014) ‘Intimacy and Social Suffering in a Globalized World [38th Foulkes Annual Lecture]’, Group Analysis47(4): 365–83.
30.
SchlapoberskyJ.R. (2016) From the Couch to the Circle: Group-Analytic Psychotherapy in Practice. London: Routledge.
31.
ScholtzR. (2014) ‘(Foundation –) Matrix reloaded – Some Remarks on a Useful Concept and its Pitfalls’, Group Analysis47(3): 201–12.
32.
TurkleS. (1995) Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet. London: Simon and Schuster.
33.
TurkleS. (2011) Alone Together: why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York: Basic Books.
34.
TurkleS. (2015) Reclaiming Conversation: the Power of Talk in a Digital Age. New York: Penguin Press.
35.
WeegmannM. (2011) ‘Working Intersubjectively: What Does it Mean for Theory and Therapy?’, Chapter 6 in HopperE.WeinbergH. (eds) The Social Unconscious in Persons, Groups, and Societies. Volume 1: Mainly Theory. London: Karnac.
36.
WeegmannM. (2014) The World Within the Group: Developing Theory for Group Analysis. London: Karnac.
37.
WeinbergH. (2014) The Paradox of Internet Groups: Alone in the Presence of Virtual Others. London: Karnac.
38.
WeinbergH. (2016) ‘Impossible Groups that Flourish in Leaking Containers’ – Challenging Group Analytic Theory? [40th Foulkes Annual Lecture]’, Group Analysis49(4): 330–49.
39.
WinterG. (2016) ‘Response to 40th Foulkes Lecture by Haim Weinberg’, Group Analysis49(4): 350–56.
