Different therapeutic modalities have differential value in curing disorders. Group therapy and individual therapy may be complementary rather than alternative approaches; thus in therapeutic reality—both may be a ‘must’ in order for one to develop and get healthy. The unique advantages of small and median groups in the optimal treatment of personal and interpersonal patterns should be used in order to revise our therapy indication system.
AgazarianY.M. (1994) ‘The Phases of Group Development and the Systems-centered Group’, in SchermerV.L.PinesM. (eds) Ring of Fire: Primitive Affects and Object Relations in Group Psychotherapy, pp. 36–86. London: Routledge.
2.
de MaréP. (2002) ‘The Millennium and the Median Group’, Group Analysis35(2): 195 –208.
3.
FoulkesS.H. (1964) Therapeutic Group Analysis. London: George Allen and Unwin.
4.
FoulkesS.H. (1968) ‘Group Dynamic Processes and Group Analysis’, in FoulkesE. (ed.) Selected Papers, pp. 175–86. London: Karnac.
5.
FoulkesS.H. (1975) Group-Analytic Psychotherapy: Method and Principles. London: Gordon and Breach. Reprinted London: Karnac, 1986.
6.
FriedmanR. (2005) Disorders Heal each other in Group Analysis—A Relation Pathology Perspective. http://www.funzionegamma.edu
7.
FriedmanR. (2006) ‘Who Contains the Group and Who is the Leader?’ European Journal of Psychotherapy and Counselling8(1): 21–32.
8.
FriedmanR. (2007) ‘Where to look? Supervising Group Analysis—A Relation Disorder Perspective’, Group Analysis40(2): 251–68.
McCallumM.PiperW.E.OgrodniczukJ.S.JoyceW.E. (2003) ‘Relationships among Psychological Mindedness, Alexithymia and Outcome in Four Forms of Short-term Psychotherapy’, Psychology and Psychotherapy76 : 133–44.
11.
PisaniR. (2000) ‘The Median Group in Clinical Practice: An Experience of Eight Years’, Group Analysis33(1): 77–90.
