Abstract
This article continues to explore some crucial differences between group analysis (as a western approach to group therapy) and the Minia integrative dynamic model (an approach that was developed in Egypt in the last decade). The article re-emphasizes the assumption that certain socio-cultural factors can grossly affect both the theory and practice of group psychotherapy; so, what can work for western therapists/patients is not necessarily supposed to work for eastern therapists/patients. The article also explores the meaning and power of love in both models of group therapy according to different perceptions, understanding and the functioning of love in different cultures.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
