This is the fourth and final article which the authors have published about the mind
and is focused on the actual theory of the mind itself as suggested by them. The
authors emphasize that as a concept the mind does exist and is contra distinct to
the scientific psychoanalytic approach. The article introduces such features as
minding, caring, humanizing and thinking to the therapeutic scene.
Attin, M.
(2003)
‘After S.H. Foulkes: Book Review of “The Social
Unconscious” by Earl Hopper’
, Group25(4):
253–298
.
2.
Blackwell, R.D.
(2004)
‘Freedom and Autonomy In Mind. A Commentary on “A Case
for Mind” by Patrick de Maré and Roberto
Sch®ollberger, and “Mind” by S.H.Foulkes’
, Group Analysis37(3):
353–357
.
3.
de Maré, P.
(2002)
‘The Millennium and the Median Group’
, Group Analysis35(2):
195–208
.
4.
de Maré, P.
,
Piper, R.
and
Thompson, S.
(1991) Koinonia.
London: Karnac
.
5.
de Maré, P.
and
Sch®ollberger, R.
(2003) ‘The Epilogue’, in
S. Schneider
and
H. Weinberg
(eds) The Larger Group Revisited, pp.
214–224.
London: Jessica Kingsley
.
6.
de Maré, P.
and
Sch®ollberger, R.
(2004)
‘A Case For Mind’
, Group Analysis37(3):
339–352
.
7.
Foulkes, S.H.
(1959) Group Psychotherapy.
London: Penguin
.
8.
Foulkes, S.H.
(2003)
‘Mind’
, Group Analysis36(3):
315–321
.
9.
Hopper, E.
(2003) The Social Unconscious and Other Papers.
New York and London: Jessica Kingsley
.
10.
Kreeger, L.
(2000)
‘Pat de Maré: A Tribute’
, Group Analysis33(1):
11–18
.
11.
Lawrence, G.
(1998) Social Dreaming and Work.
London: Karnac
.
12.
Schneider, S.
and
Weinberg, H.
(eds) (2003) The Large Group Revisited.
London: Jessica Kingsley
.
