Immigrants to the United Kingdom are often left to forge their own identities in
their new environments. This article addresses the relevance of
Foulkes’s experience of migration from Nazi Germany to England to the
development of his theories and ideas about groups. Issues of identity,
identification and groups of belonging are discussed with reference to
Foulkes’s experiences and his recently-noted tendency to idealize
groups and their therapeutic value. Foulkes’s reference to the social
unconscious ensured that the question of cultural identity would remain in the
consciousness of future generations of group analysts. These topics have
relevance to and resonance for Britain today, as the U.K. Government considers
how to respond to immigrants, refugees and asylum seekers.
Bledin, K.
(2003)
‘Migration, Identity and Group Analysis’
, Group Analysis36(1):
97-110
.
2.
Brown, D.
(1992)
‘Transcultural Group Analysis II. Use and Abuse of Cultural
Differences: Analysis and Ethics’
, Group Analysis25:
97-105
.
3.
Brown, D.
(1998)
‘Foulkes’s Basic Law of Group Dynamics 50 Years On:
Abnormality, Injustice and the Renewal of Ethics’
, Group Analysis31(4):
391-419
.
4.
Brown, D.
(2001a)
‘A Contribution to the Understanding of the Social Unconscious’
, Group Analysis34(1):
29-38
.
5.
Brown, D.
(2001b)
‘Response to Lecture by Adele Mittwoch’
, Group Analysis34(4):
449-453
.
6.
Dalal, F.
(1998) Taking the Group Seriously.
London: Jessica Kingsley
.
7.
Dalal, F.
(2001)
‘The Social Unconscious: A Post-Foulkesian Perspective’
, Group Analysis34(4):
539-555
.
8.
Dillon Weston, M.
(1996)
‘Foreigners and “Foreignness” in a Group’
, Group Analysis29:
403-410
.
9.
Erikson, E.H.
(1963) Childhood and Society.
Harmondsworth: Penguin
.
10.
Erikson, E.H.
(1968) Identity, Youth and Crisis.
London: Faber and Faber
.
11.
Foulkes, E.
(1990) ‘S. H. Foulkes: A Brief
Memoir’, in
E. Foulkes
(ed.) Selected Papers of S. H. Foulkes. Psychoanalysis and Group
Analysis, pp. 3-20.
London: Karnac
.
12.
Foulkes, E.
(1998)
‘Response to Lecture by Dennis Brown’
, Group Analysis, 31(4):
426-427
.
13.
Foulkes, S.H.
(1937) ‘On Introjection’, in
E. Foulkes
(ed.) Selected Papers of S. H. Foulkes. Psychoanalysis and Group
Analysis, pp. 57-78.
London: Karnac
, 1990.
14.
Foulkes, S.H.
(1948) Introduction to Group Analytic Psychotherapy.
Reprinted
London: Karnac
, 1983.
15.
Foulkes S.H.
(1964) Therapeutic Group Analysis.
London: George Allen and Unwin
.
16.
Foulkes, S.H.
(1973) ‘The Group as Matrix of the
Individual’s Mental Life’, in
E. Foulkes
(ed.) Selected Papers of S. H. Foulkes. Psychoanalysis and Group
Analysis, pp. 223-233,
London: Karnac
, 1990.
17.
Foulkes, S.H.
and
Anthony, E.J.
(1965) Group Psychotherapy. The Psychoanalytic
Approach.
Harmondsworth: Penguin
.
18.
Freud, S.
(1933) ‘New Introductory Lectures on
Psycho-Analysis.’ Standard Edition, Vol. 22.
London: Hogarth Press
, 1964.
19.
Fromm, E.
(1980) Beyond the Chains of Illusion: My Encounter with Marx
and Freud.
London: Abacus
.
20.
Frosh, S.
(1997) For and Against Psychoanalysis.
London: Routledge
.
21.
Fuchs, S.H.
(1930) ‘Observation on the Significance of the
Name in a Schizophrenic’, in
E. Foulkes
(ed) Selected Papers of S. H. Foulkes. Psychoanalysis and Group
Analysis, pp. 31-37.
London: Karnac
, 1990.
22.
Gilman, S. L.
(1993) Freud, Race and Gender.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
.
23.
Glenn, L.
(1987)
‘Attachment Theory and Group Analysis: The Group Matrix as a
Secure Base’
, Group Analysis20:
109-126
.
24.
Grinberg, L.
and
Grinberg, R.
(1989) Psychoanalytic Perspectives on Migration and
Exile.
New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
.
25.
Hoffman, E.
(1989) Lost in Translation.
London: Vintage
.
26.
Hollander, N.C.
(1998)
‘Exile: Paradoxes of Loss and Creativity’
, British Journal of Psychotherapy15:
201-215
.
27.
Hopper, E.
(2001)
‘The Social Unconscious: Theoretical Considerations’
, Group Analysis34(1):
9-27
.
28.
Kreeger, L.
(1992)
‘Envy Preemption in Small and Large Groups’
, Group Analysis25:
391-412
.
29.
Le Roy, J.
(1993) ‘Group Analysis and
Culture’, in
D. Brown
and
L. Zinkin
(eds) The Psyche and the Social World, pp.
180-201.
London: Routledge
.
30.
Mark, P.
(2000) ‘Review of
I.N. Harwood
and
M. Pines
(eds) Self Experiences in Groups.
London: Jessica Kingsley
, 1998’, Group Analysis 33(2): 299-300.
31.
Nitsun, M.
(1991)
‘The Anti-Group: Destructive Forces in the Group and their
Therapeutic Potential’
, Group Analysis24:
7-20
.
32.
Nitsun, M.
(1996) The Anti-Group. Destructive Forces in the Group and
their Creative Potential.
London: Routledge
.
33.
Nitsun, M.
(2000)
‘The Future of the Group’
, International Journal of Group Psychotherapy50(4):
455-472
.
34.
Paris, J.
(1978)
‘The Symbolic Return: Psychodynamic Aspects of Immigration and Exile’
, Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis6(1):
51-57
.
35.
Pines, M.
(1994)
‘Psychoanalysis and Group Analysis: Jews and Germans.
Figureground Relationships’
, Proceedings of the 9th European Symposium in Group Analysis,
1993: ‘Boundaries and Barriers’. (eds
W. Knauss
and
U. Keller
). Heidelberg: Mattes-Verlag.
36.
Rohr, E.
(1999)
‘Bridging - Without Arriving’
, Unpublished paper presented at the 11th European Symposium on
Group Analysis, Budapest.
37.
Rouchy J.C.
(1995)
‘Identification and Groups of Belonging’
, Group Analysis28:
129-141
.
38.
Rudnytsky, P.L.
(1999)
‘Does the Professor Talk to God? Countertransference and Jewish
Identity in the Case of Little Hans’
, Psychoanalysis and History1:
175-194
.
39.
Sengun, S.
(2001)
Migration as a Transitional Space and Group Analysis
, Group Analysis34(1):
65-78
.
