The Mexican social unconscious: ‘Confusion of tongues’ in tripartite matrices of colonized countries. Response to ‘The Mexican social unconscious—Part I: The roots of a nation’ and ‘Part II: Politics and group analysis’ by Reyna Hernández de Tubert
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online June, 2023
The Mexican social unconscious: ‘Confusion of tongues’ in tripartite matrices of colonized countries. Response to ‘The Mexican social unconscious—Part I: The roots of a nation’ and ‘Part II: Politics and group analysis’ by Reyna Hernández de Tubert
This response is based on Reyna Hernández de Tubert two articles: The Mexican social unconscious—Part I: The roots of a nation’ and ‘Part II: Politics and group analysis’ (Hernández de Tubert, 2021). It discusses the role of the myth of mestization and the myth of conquest in the Mexican social unconscious in Mexican tripartite matrices. It also draws attention to Ferenczi’s trauma theory—confusion of tongues—exploring the psychoanalytic and group analytic ideas on the ‘identification with the aggressor’ in association with the concepts of introjection and incorporation.
AbrahamNTorokM (1994) The Kernel and the Shell. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2.
AsmannA (2015) Shadows of Trauma: Memory and the Politics of Postwar Identity. New York: Fordham University Press.
3.
CintraEM (2018) Introjeção, incorporação e identificação com o agressor: considerações a partir de Sándor Ferenczi. [Introjection, icorporation and identification with the aggressor: considerations from Sandor Ferenczi]. Ide40(66): 81–98.
4.
DalalF (1998) Taking the Group Seriously: Towards a Post-Foulkesian Group Analytic Theory. London: Jessica Kingsley.
5.
EliasN (1984) What is Sociology?New York: Columbia University Press.
6.
FerencziS (1909) Introjection and Transference. In: Sex in Psychoanalysis. New York: Dover, 1956, pp. 30–79.
7.
FerencziS (1912) On the definition of introjection. In: BalintM (1955) (ed.) Final contributions to the problems and methods of psychoanalysis. New York: Basic Books, pp. 316–318.
8.
FerencziS (1933) Confusion of the tongues between the adults and the child — (The language of tenderness and of passion). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 1949, 30: 225–230.
9.
FoucaultM (1991) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. London: Penguin Books.
10.
FreyreG (1936) The Mansions and the Shanties. The making of modern Brazil. California: University of California Press, 1987.
11.
FreudS (1921) Group Psychology and the Analysis of The Ego. S.E., 18. London: Hogarth, pp. 67–143.
12.
FredricksonG (2002) Racism. A Short History. Princeton and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13.
FoulkesSH (1937) On introjection. In: FoulkesE (ed.). S.H. Foulkes: Selected papers. London: Karnac, 1990, pp. 57–78.
14.
GaltungJ (1969) Violence, Peace and Peace Research. Journal of Peace Research6(3): 167–191.
HidasG (2012) Ferenczi and Trauma: a perilous journey to the labyrinth. In: Szekacs-weiszKeve T (2012) Ferenczi and His World. Rekindling the Spirit of the Budapest School. London: Karnac, pp. 11–127.
20.
HopperE (1991) Encapsulation as a defence against the fear of annihilation. International Journal of Psychoanalysis72(4): 607–624.
21.
HopperE (2003a) Social Unconscious: Selected Papers. London: Jessica Kingsley.
22.
HopperE (2003b) Traumatic experience in the unconscious life of groups: the fourth basic assumption: Incohesion: Aggregation / Massification or (ba) I: A/M. London: Jessica Kingsley.
23.
HopperE (In Press) The Tripartite Matrix in Foulkesian Group Analysis. In: HopperEWeinbergH (eds) The social unconscious in persons, groups and societies. vol. 4. Clinical Implications. London: Routledge.
24.
HopperEWeinbergH (2011) The social unconscious in persons, groups and societies. vol. 1. Mainly theory. London: Karnac.
25.
HopperEWeinbergH (2016) The social unconscious in persons, groups and societies. vol. 2. Mainly Foundation Matrices. London: Karnac.
26.
HopperEWeinbergH (2017) The social unconscious in persons, groups and societies. vol. 3. The foundation matrices extended and reconfigured. London: Karnac.
27.
NitzgenDHopperE (2017) The concepts of the social unconscious and of the matrix in the work of S.H. Foulkes. In: HopperEWeinbergH (eds) The social unconscious in persons, groups and societies. vol. 3. The foundation matrices extended and reconfigured. London: Karnac.
28.
PennaC (2016) Brazilian Social Unconscious. In: HopperEWeinbergH (eds) The social unconscious in persons, groups and societies. vol. 2. Mainly Foundation matrices. London: Karnac, pp. 139–158.
29.
TaguieffPA (2001) The Force of Prejudice: On Racism and Its Doubles. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
30.
Tubert-OklanderJ (2011) Enrique Pichon-Rivière: the social unconscious in the Latin American tradition in group analysis. In: HopperEWeinbergH (eds) The Social Unconscious in Persons, Groups and Societies. vol.1. Mainly Theory. London: Karnac, pp. 45–70.
31.
Tubert-OklanderJ (2019) Ferenczi and Group Analysis. Group Analysis52(1): 23–35.