In this article, the way that the jury works is considered from a group-analytic perspective. Observational fieldwork of simulated jury deliberations is presented. The data was gathered from a joint funded Home Office and Law Commission project at the Socio Legal Studies Centre, Oxford in 1995. Inferences are drawn from the observations and the unconscious group processes are considered. The efficacy of the jury process is discussed.
Alford, F.
(1990) `Reparation and civilization. A Kleinian account of the large group'. Free Associations, 19: 7-30.
2.
Aristotle
(1905) Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3.
Baron, R.S.
, Kerr, N.L. and Miller, N. (1992) Group Process, Group Decision, Group Action. Buckingham: Open University Press.
4.
Bick, E.
(1964) `Notes on the technique of infant observation'. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 45: 558-556.
5.
Clapham, B.
(1991) `Is our Jury System at Risk?'Justice of the Peace155(39): 615-616.
6.
Crowther, E.
(1992) `Eliminating Prejudice from the Jury Room', Justice of the Peace156(24): 381-383.
7.
Diamond, S.S.
and Casper, J.D. (1992) `Blindfolding the Jury to Verdict Consequences', Law and Society Review26(3): 513-563.
8.
Findlay, M.
and Duff, P. (1988) The Jury Under Attack. London. Butterworths.
9.
Hans, V.P.
and Vidmar, N. (1986) Judging the Jury. New York: Plenum Press.
10.
Klein, M.
(1963) `Some Reflections on The Oresteia', in her Envy and Gratitude and Other Works 1946-1963. London: Virago Press, 1988.
11.
Mills, L.R.
and Kessler, J.B. (1973) `Six-Member and Twelve-Member Juries: An Empirical Study of Trial Results', University of Michigan Journal of Law ReformsSpring: 671-734.
12.
Pennington, N.
(1981) `Juror Decision Making Models: The Generalization Gap', Psychological Bulletin89: 246-287.
13.
Rustin, M.
(1989) `Observing Infants: reflections on method'. Chapter in: Closely Observed Infants. Ed. Miller, L., Rustin, M., Rustin, M.R., Shuttleworth, J. (pp. 52-75) London: Duckworth.
14.
Rustin, M.
(1990) The Good Society and the Inner World. London: Verso.
15.
Stewart, J.
, Kendall, E. and Coote, A. (1994) Citizens Juries. London: Institute for Public Policy Research.
16.
Strotbeck, F.L.
(1962) `Social Process, the Law and Jury Functioning', in?. Evan (ed.) Law and Sociology144.
17.
Strotbeck, F.L.
and Hook, L.H. (1961) `The Social Dimensions of a 12-Man Jury and Table', Sociometry24: 397.
18.
Winship, G. (1995) `Psychoanalytic Group Observation of Children in the Setting of a Nursery - A Methodological Enquiry', MA Dissertation, London: Tavistock.
19.
Winship, G.
(1997) `Justice as an Inherent Characteristic of Group Dynamics?'Free Associations7(1, 41): 64-80.
20.
Zeisel, H.
and Diamond, S. (1978) `The Effect of Peremptory Challenges on Jury and Verdict: An Experiment in a Federal District Court', Stanford Law Review30: 491-531.
