Marxian economists in China have put forward several interpretations of the transformation problem that differ from interpretations available in the English Marxian literature. These contributions remain unfamiliar to the English world due to language barriers. Thus, this paper provides a review of four representative Chinese contributions.
BaiBaoli. 2006. A Study of the Transformation Problem. Beijing: Commercial Press.
2.
BortkiewiczLadislaus. 1949. On the correction of Marx’s fundamental theoretical construction in the third volume ofCapital. In Karl Marx and the Close of His System by Eugenvon Böhm-Bawerk and Böhm-Bawerk’s Criticism of Marx by Rudolf Hilferding, ed. Paul Sweezy, 197–221. New York: Augustus M. Kelley.
3.
DingBaojun. 2005. Marx’s Labor Theory of Value and Contemporary Reality. Beijing: Economic Science Press.
4.
DingBaojunLiGuicai. 2005. Have we settled the transformation problem?Contemporary Economic Research7: 3–8.
5.
DuménilGérard. 1983. Beyond the transformation riddle: A labor theory of value. Science & Society47 (4): 427–50.
6.
EngelsFrederick. 1981. Preface. In Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, volume 3. London: Penguin.
7.
FoleyDuncan K.1982. The value of money, the value of labor power, and the Marxian transformation problem. Review of Radical Political Economics14 (2): 37–47.
8.
FujimoriYoriaki. 1985. On a recent discussion of the transformation problem. Josai Journal of Economics21 (2): 443–51.
9.
HuDaiguang. 1983. A review of the New Cambridge School. Economic Research Journal (1): 61–6.
10.
HuanZhongdanZhangZhongren. 2005. A necessary and sufficient condition of positive solutions to the BSZ transformation model. Shimane Journal of Policy Studies9: 29–34.
11.
LaibmanDavid. 1973. Values and prices of production: The political economy of the transformation problem. Science & Society37 (4): 404–36.
12.
LiMengfan. 2020. The transformation problem: An extension of the TSSI model. Contemporary Economic Research7: 61–72.
13.
LipietzAlain. 1982. The so-called “transformation problem” revisited. Journal of Economic Theory26 (1): 59–88.
14.
LüChanghui. 2004. The transformation problem: A new test. China Review of Political Economy2: 49–92.
15.
MarxKarl. 1975. Karl Marx, Frederick Engels: Collected Works, volume 32. New York: International.
16.
———. 1981. Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, volume 3. London: Penguin.
17.
MohunSimonVenezianiRoberto. 2017. Value, price, and exploitation: The logic of the transformation problem. Journal of Economic Surveys31 (5): 1387–420.
18.
MorishimaMichio. 1973. Marx’s Economics: A Dual Theory of Value and Growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19.
NikaidoHukukane. 1977. Refutation of the dynamic equalization of profit rates in Marx’s scheme of reproduction. Working paper no. 7722, Department of Economics, University of Southern California.
20.
RoemerJohn E.1981. Analytical Foundations of Marxian Economic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21.
RongZhaoziLiBangxiChenYang. 2016. Theories on the Marxian transformation problem and a new model. Studies on Marxism2: 66–78.
22.
SetonFrancis. 1957. The “transformation problem.”Review of Economic Studies24 (3): 149–60.
23.
ShenMingming. 2008. On Marx’s two-department transformation problem. China Review of Political Economy13: 42–52.
24.
YanJinqiangMaYan. 2011. A Theoretical Study of the Value Transformation. Shanghai: Shanghai University of Finance and Economics Press.
25.
YueHongzhi. 2002. Re-examining the transformation problem. Contemporary Economy Study10: 41–5.
26.
YueHongzhiKouYaling. 2005. A mathematical proof on Marx’s transformation theories. Journal of Quantitative & Technical Economics6: 3–10.
27.
ZhangZhongren. 2004. A Solution to the 100-Year-Old Puzzle. Beijing: People’s Publishing House.
28.
ZhuKui. 2004. A Marxist solution to the transformation problem. Economic Review1: 9–17.
29.
ZhuShaowen. 1981. An anatomy of Samuelson’s attacks and misrepresentations of Marxian economics. Inquiry into Economic Issues6: 60–70.
30.
———. 1983. Post-war debates on the transformation problem. Economic Theory & Business Management6: 37–45.
