By reconsidering the concept of normal degree of utilization in view of the fact that growth occurs through irregular fluctuations, the paper points out elements of weakness in the formalizations of the principles that underlie the notion of Harrodian instability. Since the latter was at the origin of the adoption of fully adjusted positions to represent long-term trends of the economy, such arguments call into question this way of addressing demand-led growth.
AftalionAlbert. 1927. The theory of economic cycles based on the capitalistic technique of production. Review of Economics and Statistics9 (4):165–70.
2.
AllainOlivier. 2015. Tackling the instability of growth: A Kaleckian-Harrodian model with an autonomous expenditure component. Cambridge Journal of Economics39 (5): 1351–71.
3.
AspromourgosTony. 2013. Sraffa’s system in relation to some main currents in unorthodox economics. In Sraffa and the Reconstruction of Economic Theory, volume 3, eds. Sergio LevreroE.PalumboAntonellaStiratiAntonella, 15–33. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
4.
AuerbachPaulSkottPeter. 1988. Concentration, competition, and distribution: A critique of theories of monopoly capital. International Review of Applied Economics2 (1): 42–61.
5.
BesomiDaniele. 2001. Harrod’s dynamics and the theory of growth: The story of a mistaken attribution. Cambridge Journal of Economics25 (1): 79–96.
6.
BortisHeinrich. 1984. Employment in a capitalist economy. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics6 (4): 590–604.
7.
CicconeRoberto. 1986. Accumulation and capacity utilization: Some critical considerations on Joan Robinson’s theory of distribution. Political Economy: Studies in the Surplus Approach2 (1): 17–36.
8.
ClarkJ. Maurice. 1917. Business acceleration and the law of demand: A technical factor in economic cycles. Journal of Political Economy25 (3): 217–35.
9.
CommitteriMarco. 1986. Some comments on recent contributions on capital accumulation, income distribution and capacity utilization. Political Economy: Studies in the Surplus Approach2 (2): 161–86.
10.
DejuànÓscar. 2013. Normal paths of growth shaped by the supermultiplier. In Sraffa and the Reconstruction of Economic Theory, volume 2, eds. Sergio LevreroE.PalumboAntonellaStiratiAntonella, 139–57. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
11.
DuttAmitava Krishna. 1990. Growth, Distribution and Uneven Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.
FrankeReiner. 2020. An attempt at a reconciliation of the Sraffian and Kaleckian views on desired utilization. European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention17 (1): 61–77.
13.
GaregnaniPierangelo. 1976. On a change in the notion of equilibrium in recent work on value and distribution: a comment on Samuelson. In Essays in Modern Capital Theory, eds. BrownMurraySatoKazuoZarembkaPaul25–45. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
14.
GaregnaniPierangelo. 1992. Some notes for an analysis of accumulation. In Beyond the Steady State: A Revival of Growth Theory, eds. HaleviJosephLaibmanDavidNellEdward J.47–71. London: Macmillan.
15.
GaregnaniPierangeloTrezziniAttilio. 2010. Cycles and growth: A source of demand-driven endogenous growth. Review of Political Economy22 (1): 119–25.
16.
GirardiDanielePariboniRiccardo. 2019. Normal utilization as the adjusting variable in neo-Kaleckian growth models: A critique. Metroeconomica70 (2): 341–58.
17.
HarrodRoy F.1939. An essay on dynamic theory. Economic Journal49 (2): 14–33.
18.
HarrodRoy F.1948. Towards a Dynamic Economics. London: Macmillan.
19.
HeinEckhardLavoieMarcvan TreeckTill. 2011. Some instability puzzles in Kaleckian models of growth and distribution: A critical survey. Cambridge Journal of Economics35 (3): 587–612.
20.
HeinEckhardLavoieMarcvan TreeckTill. 2012. Harrodian instability and the “normal rate” of capacity utilization in Kaleckian models of distribution and growth: A survey. Metroeconomica63 (1): 139–69.
21.
KaldorNicholas. 1954. The relation of economic growth and cyclical fluctuations. Economic Journal64 (253): 53–71.
22.
KaleckiMichal. 1968. Trend and business cycles reconsidered. Economic Journal78 (310): 263–76.
23.
KregelJan. 1980. Economic dynamics and the theory of steady growth: An historical essay on Harrod’s “knife-edge.”History of Political Economy12 (1): 97–123.
24.
LavoieMarc. 2014. Post-Keynesian Economics: New Foundations. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
25.
NikiforosMichalis. 2013. The (normal) rate of capacity utilization at the firm level. Metroeconomica64 (3): 513–38.
26.
PalumboAntonellaTrezziniAttilio. 2020. Overinvestment and depreciation: A reflection on investment decisions in the theory of demand-led growth. Forthcoming.
27.
RoncagliaAlessandro. 1978. Sraffa and the Theory of Prices. London: Wiley.
SchoderChristian. 2014. Instability, stationary utilization and effective demand: A structuralist model of endogenous cycles. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics30 (C): 10–29.
30.
SerranoFranklin. 1995. Long-period effective demand and the Sraffian supermultiplier. Contributions to Political Economy14 (1): 67–90.
31.
SetterfieldMark. 2018. Long-run variation in capacity utilization in the presence of a fixed normal rate. Cambridge Journal of Economics43 (2): 271–94.
32.
ShaikhAnwar. 2016. Capitalism: Competition, Conflict, Crises. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33.
SkottPeter. 2012. Theoretical and empirical shortcomings of the Kaleckian investment function. Metroeconomica63 (1): 109–38.
34.
SteindlJosef. 1952. Maturity and Stagnation in American Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35.
TavaniDanielePetachLuke. 2019. No one is alone: Strategic complementarities, capacity utilization, growth, and distribution. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics50: 203–15.
36.
TrezziniAttilio. 1995. Capacity utilization in the long-run and the autonomous components of aggregate demand. Contributions to Political Economy14: 33–66.
37.
TrezziniAttilio. 2013. The meaning of output trends in the analysis of growth. In Sraffa and the Reconstruction of Economic Theory, volume 2, eds. Sergio LevreroE.PalumboAntonellaStiratiAntonella, 68–91. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
38.
TrezziniAttilioPalumboAntonella. 2016. The theory of output in the modern Classical approach: Main principles and controversial issues. Review of Keynesian Economics4 (4): 503–22.
39.
TrezziniAttilioPignalosaDaria. forthcoming. The normal degree of capacity utilization: The history of an ambiguous concept. Centro Sraffa Working Papers.
40.
VianelloFernando. 1985. The pace of accumulation. Political Economy: Studies in the Surplus Approach1 (1): 69–87.
