This article looks at the implications of labor-supply limits and endogenous wage growth in the Duménil and Lévy model. A long-run relationship is established between the employment rate and capitalists’ decisions to reinvest profits. Elements of a Marxian approach to macroeconomic policy are sketched. New conditions are derived for being Kaleckian/Keynesian in the short run and classical Marxian in the long run.
ArmstrongP.GlynA.HarrisonJ.1991. Capitalism since 1945. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
2.
BlanchflowerD. G.OswaldA. J.1995. An introduction to the wage curve. Journal of Economic Perspectives9:153–67.
3.
BowlesS.1985. The production process in a competitive economy: Walrasian, neo-Hobbesian, and Marxian models. The American Economic Review75:16–36.
4.
BowlesS.GordonD. M.WeisskopfT. E.1986. Power and profits: The social structure of accumulation and the profitability of the postwar U.S. economy. Review of Radical Political Economics18:132–67.
5.
DesaiM.1973. Growth cycles and inflation in a model of the class struggle. Journal of Economic Theory6:527–45.
6.
DuménilG.LévyD.1993. The Economics of the Profit Rate. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
7.
DuménilG.LévyD.1999. Being Keynesian in the short term and classical in the long term: The traverse to classical long-term equilibrium. The Manchester School67:684–716.
8.
DuménilG.LévyD.2011. The Crisis of Neoliberalism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
9.
DuménilG.LévyD.2014. A reply to Amitava Dutt: The role of aggregate demand in the long run. Cambridge Journal of Economics38:1285–92.
10.
DuttA. K.2011. The role of aggregate demand in classical-Marxian models of economic growth. Cambridge Journal of Economics35:357–82.
11.
FoleyD. K.1987. Liquidity-profit rate cycles in a capitalist economy. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization8:363–76.
12.
FoleyD. K.MichlT. R.2010. The classical theory of growth and distribution. In Handbook of Alternative Theories of Economic Growth, ed. SetterfieldM., 49–63. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
13.
FriedmanM.1968. The role of monetary policy. The American Economic Review58:1–17.
14.
GodleyW.LavoieM.2007. Fiscal policy in a stock-flow consistent (SFC) model. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics30:79–100.
15.
GoodwinR. M.1967. A growth cycle. In Socialism, Capitalism and Economic Growth, ed. FeinsteinC. H., 54–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16.
KaldorN.1966. Marginal productivity and macro-economic theories of distribution. The Review of Economic Studies33:309–19.
17.
KaleckiM.1971. Selected Essays on the Dynamics of the Capitalist Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
KeynesJ. M.1964. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. San Diego: Harcourt.
19.
KieferDRadaC.2015. Profit maximizing goes global: the race to the bottom. Cambridge Journal of Economics39: 1333–1350.
20.
LavoieM.GodleyW.2001–2002. Kaleckian models of growth in a coherent stock-flow monetary framework: A Kaldorian view. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics24:277–311.
21.
LavoieM.KrieslerP.2007. Capacity utilization, inflation and monetary policy: The Duménil and Lévy macro model and the new Keynesian consensus. Review of Radical Political Economics39:586–98.
22.
MarglinS. A.BhaduriA.1991. Profit squeeze and Keynesian theory. In The Golden Age of Capitalism, eds. MarglinS. A.SchorJ. B., 153–86. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23.
MarxK. (1867) 1990. Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, Volume One. London: Penguin.
24.
MichlT. R.2009. Capitalists, Workers and Fiscal Policy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
25.
MohunS.2014. Unproductive labor in the U.S. economy 1964–2010. Review of Radical Political Economics46:355–79.
26.
NikiforosM.FoleyD. K.2012. Distribution and capacity utilization: Conceptual issues and empirical evidence. Metroeconomica63:200–29.
27.
PasinettiL.1962. Rate of profit and income distribution in relation to the rate of economic growth. The Review of Economic Studies29:267–79.
28.
PollinR.1996. “Socialization of investment” and “euthanasia of the rentier”: The relevance of Keynesian policy ideas for the contemporary US economy. International Review of Applied Economics10:49–64.
29.
PollinR.1998. The “reserve army of labor” and the “natural rate of unemployment”: Can Marx, Kalecki, Friedman, and Wall Street all be wrong?Review of Radical Political Economics30:1–13.
30.
SkottP.1989. Conflict and Effective Demand in Economic Growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31.
SkottP.2010. Growth, instability and cycles: Harrodian and Kaleckian models of accumulation and income distribution. In Handbook of Alternative Theories of Economic Growth, ed. SetterfieldM., 108–31. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
32.
SkottP.2012. Theoretical and empirical shortcomings of the Kaleckian investment function. Metroeconomica63:109–38.
33.
SkottP.ZippererB.2012. An empirical evaluation of three post-Keynesian models. European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention9:277–308.
34.
TaylorL.2004. Reconstructing Macroeconomics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
35.
TaylorL.2012. Growth, cycles, asset prices and finance. Metroeconomica63:40–63.
36.
von ArnimR.BarralesJ.2015. Demand-driven Goodwin cycles with Kaldorian and Kaleckian features. Review of Keynesian Economics3:351–73.
