The main argument put forward in the paper is that the recent neo-Schumpeterian literature, while providing fundamental contributions to our understanding of innovation, has contributed to the emergence of an optimistic reading of the relationship between technology, economy, and society, with technology able to guarantee strong economic growth and social welfare. It is also argued that such an “optimistic bias” has been associated with a dominant supply-side and micro-based view of the technology–economy relationships.
AghionP.HowittP.1992. A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica60:323–51.
2.
AghionP.HowittP.1998. Endogenous Growth Theory. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
3.
AndersenE. S.2001. Satiation in an evolutionary model of structural economic dynamics. Journal of Evolutionary Economics11:143–64.
4.
ArchibugiD.FilippettiA.2011a. Innovation in times of crisis: National systems of innovation, structure, and demand. Research Policy40 (2): 179–92.
5.
ArchibugiD.FilippettiA.2011b. Is the crisis impairing convergence in innovation in Europe?Journal of Common Market Studies49 (6): 1153–82.
6.
ArrowK.1962. Economic welfare and allocation of resources for invention. In The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors, ed. NelsonR.: 609–626. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
7.
BasuD.VasudevanR.2013. Technology, distribution and the rate of profit in the US economy: Understanding the current crisis. Cambridge Journal of Economics37:57–89.
8.
BresnahanT.2010. General purpose technologies. In Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, ed. HallB. H.RosenbergN.: 761–791. Amsterdam: North Holland.
9.
BuenstorfG.CantnerU.HanuschH.HutterM.LorenzH. W.RahmeyerF., eds. 2013. The Two Sides of Innovation. Cham: Springer.
10.
CantnerU.KrügerI. J.2008. Micro-heterogeneity and aggregate productivity development in the German manufacturing sector: Results from a decomposition exercise. Journal of Evolutionary Economics18 (5): 119–33.
11.
CastellacciF.2007. Evolutionary and new growth theories. Are they converging?Journal of Economic Surveys21 (3): 585–627.
12.
ChaminadeC.EdquistC.2006. From theory to practice: The use of the systems of innovation approach in innovation policy. In Innovation, Learning and Institutions, ed. HageJ.De MeeusM.: 141–162. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13.
CohenW. M.2010. Fifty years of empirical studies of innovative activity and performance. In Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, ed. HallB. H.RosenbergN.: 129–213. Amsterdam: North Holland.
14.
CoombsR.SaviottiP.WalshV.1987. Economics and Technological Change. Totowa: Rowman & Littlefield.
15.
CourvisanosJ.2009. Political aspects of innovation. Research Policy38 (7): 1117–24.
16.
CourvisanosJ.2012. Cycles, Crises and Innovation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
17.
DavidP. A.1991. Computer and dynamo: The modern productivity paradox in a not-too distant mirror. In Technology and Productivity: 315–348. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
18.
DavidP. A.WrightG.1999. General Purpose Technologies and Productivity Surges: Historical Reflections on the Future of the ICT Revolution (Discussion Papers in Economic and Social History, No. 31). Oxford: University of Oxford.
19.
DogsonM.RothwellR., eds. 1994. The Handbook of Industrial Innovation. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
20.
DosiG.1982. Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy11:147–62.
21.
DosiG.1988. Sources, procedures and microeconomic effects of innovation. Journal of Economic Literature26:1120–71.
22.
DosiG.2013. Innovation, evolution, and economics: Where we are and where we should go. In Innovation Studies: Evolution and Future Challenges, ed. FagerbergJ.MartinB.AndersenE. S.: 111–133. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23.
DosiG.FagioloG.RoventiniA.2006. An evolutionary model of endogenous business cycles. Computational Economics27:3–34.
24.
DosiG.FagioloG.RoventiniA.2010. Schumpeter meeting Keynes: A policy-friendly model of endogenous growth and business cycles. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control34:1748–67.
25.
DosiG.FreemanC.NelsonR.SilverbergG.SoeteL., eds. 1988. Technical Change and Economic Theory. London: Pinter.
26.
DosiG.GalambosL., eds. 2013. The Third Industrial Revolution in Global Business. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27.
DosiG.GrazziM.2009. Energy, development, and the environment: An appraisal three decades after the “limits to growth” debate. In Recent Advances in Neo-Schumpeterian Economics, ed. PykaA.CantnerU.GreinerA.KuhnT.: 34–52. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
28.
DosiG.NelsonR.2010. Technological change and industrial dynamics as evolutionary processes. In Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, ed. HallB. H.RosenbergN.: 51–128. Amsterdam: North Holland.
29.
DosiG.SodiniM.VirgillitoM. E.2015. Profit-driven and demand-driven investment growth and fluctuations in different accumulation regimes. Journal of Evolutionary Economics25 (4): 707–28.
30.
EdquistC.1997. Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions, and Organizations. London: Pinter.
31.
EvangelistaR.1999. Knowledge and Investment: The Sources of Innovation in Industry. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
32.
EvangelistaR.GuerrieriP.MelicianiV.2014. The economic impact of digital technologies in Europe. Economics of Innovation and New Technology23 (8): 802–24.
33.
EvangelistaR.MastrostefanoV.2006. Firm size, sectors and countries as sources of variety in innovation. Economics of Innovation and New Technology5 (3): 247–70.
34.
FagerbergJ.1994. Technology and international differences in growth rates. Journal of Economic Literature32(3): 1147–75.
35.
FagerbergJ.2003. Schumpeter and the revival of evolutionary economics: An appraisal of the literature. Journal of Evolutionary Economics13:125–59.
36.
FagerbergJ.2013. Innovation Studies: Evolution and Future Challenges. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37.
FagerbergJ.FosaasM.SapprasertK.2012. Innovation: Exploring the knowledge base. Research Policy41:1132–53.
38.
FagerbergJ.MoweryD.NelsonR., eds. 2005. The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
39.
FagerbergJ.SrholecM.KnellM.2007. The competitiveness of nations: Why some countries prosper while others fall behind?World Development35 (10): 1595–1620.
40.
FagerbergJ.VerspagenB.2009. Innovation studies—The emerging structure of a new scientific field. Research Policy38 (2): 218–33.
41.
FosterJ.2011. Evolutionary macroeconomics: A research agenda. Journal of Evolutionary Economics21:5–28.
42.
FreemanC.1987. Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Pinter.
43.
FreemanC.1995. The “national system of innovation” in historical perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics19:5–24.
44.
FreemanC.2007. A Schumpeterian renaissance? In Elgar Companion to Neo-Schumpeterian Economics, ed. HanuschH.PykaA.: 130–141. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
45.
FreemanC.ClarkC.SoeteL., eds. 1982. Unemployment and Technical Innovation. London: Pinter.
46.
FreemanC.LouçãF.2001. As Time Goes by: From the Industrial Revolutions to the Information Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
47.
FreemanC.PerezC.1988. Structural crises of adjustment, business cycles and investment behaviour. In Technical Change and Economic Theory, ed. DosiG.FreemanC.NelsonR.SilverbergG.SoeteL.: 38–66. London: Pinter.
48.
FreemanC.SoeteL.1994. Work for All or Mass Unemployment? Computerised Technical Change in the Twenty-First Century. London: Pinter.
49.
FrigatoP.Santos-ArteagaF. J.2012. Planned obsolescence and the manufacture of doubt: On social costs and the evolutionary theory of the firm. In Social Costs Today, ed. RamazzottiP.FrigatoP.ElsnerW.: 73–95. London: Routledge.
GualerziD.2010. The Coming of Age of Information Technologies and the Path of Transformational Growth: A Long Run Perspective on the 2000s. Abingdon: Routledge.
52.
HallB. H.RosenbergN., eds. 2010. Handbook of the Economics of Innovation. Amsterdam: North Holland.
53.
HanuschH.PykaA., eds. 2007. Elgar Companion to Neo-Schumpeterian Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
54.
KaldorN.1961. Capital accumulation and economic growth. In The Theory of Capital, ed. LutzF. A.HagueD. C.: 177–222. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
55.
KaleckiM. (1935) 1971. The mechanism of business upswing. In Selected Essays on the Dynamics of the Capitalist Economy 1933–1970, ed. KaleckiM.: 26–34. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56.
KaleckiM.1954. Theory of Economic Dynamics. London: Allen and Unwin.
57.
KappK. W.1950. The Social Costs of Private Enterprise. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
58.
KappK. W.1969. On the nature and significance of social costs. Kyklos22(2): 334-347.
59.
KeynesJ. M.1931. Essays in Persuasion. London: Macmillan.
KurzH. D.2008. Innovations and profits: Schumpeter and the classical heritage. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization67:263–78.
62.
LoasbyB. J.2001. Cognition, imagination and institutions in demand creation. Journal of Evolutionary Economics11:7–21.
63.
LucasR.1988. On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics11 (1): 3–42.
64.
LundvallB.BorrasS.2005. Science, technology and innovation policy. In The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, ed. FagerbergJ.MoweryD.NelsonR.: 599–631. New York: Oxford University Press.
MarxK.1981. Capital (Vol. 3). New York: Penguin Books.
67.
MazzucatoM.2013. The Entrepreneurial State. London: Anthem Press.
68.
McMeekinA.TomlinsonM.GreenK.WalshV., eds. 2011. Innovation by Demand: An Interdisciplinary Approach to the Study of Demand and Its Role in Innovation. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
69.
MetcalfeJ. S.1995. The economic foundations of technology policy: Equilibrium and evolutionary perspectives. In Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change, ed. StonemanP.: 409–512. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
70.
MetcalfeJ. S.2001. Consumption, preferences, and the evolutionary agenda. Journal of Evolutionary Economics11:37–58.
MoweryD.RosenbergN.1979. The influence of market demand upon innovation: A critical review of some recent empirical studies. Research Policy8:102–53.
73.
NelsonR., ed. 1993. National Innovation Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
74.
NelsonR.WinterS. G.1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge: Belknap Press/Harvard University Press.
75.
PaganoU.RossiM. A.2011. Property rights in the knowledge economy. In The Global Economic Crisis, ed. BrancaccioE.FontanaR.: 284–297. Abingdon: Routledge.
76.
PerezC.2002. Technological Revolutions and Financial Capital: The Dynamics of Bubbles and Golden Ages. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
77.
PerezC.2010. Technological revolutions and techno-economic paradigms. Cambridge Journal of Economics34(1): 185–202.
78.
PiantaM.2005. Innovation and employment. In The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, ed. FagerbergJ.MoweryD.NelsonR., 568–98. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
79.
RamazzottiP.FrigatoP.ElsnerW., eds. 2012. Social Costs Today. London: Routledge.
80.
RomerP.1990. Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy98:71–102.
81.
RomerP.1994. The origins of endogenous growth. The Journal of Economic Perspectives8 (1): 3–22.
82.
SaviottiP.2001. Variety, growth and demand. Journal of Evolutionary Economics11:119–42.
83.
SaviottiP.PykaA.2004. Economic development by the creation of new sectors. Journal of Evolutionary Economics14 (1): 1–35.
84.
SaviottiP.PykaA.2008. Product variety, competition and economic growth. Journal of Evolutionary Economics18:167–82.
85.
SaviottiP.PykaA.2013. The co-evolution of innovation, demand and growth. Economics of Innovation and New Technology22 (5): 461–82.
86.
SchubertC.2012. Is novelty always a good thing? Towards an evolutionary welfare economics. Journal of Evolutionary Economics22 (3): 585–619.
87.
SchubertC.2013. How to evaluate creative destruction: Reconstructing Schumpeter’s approach. Cambridge Journal of Economics37:227–50.
88.
SchumpeterJ. A. (1912) 1934. The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
89.
SchumpeterJ. A.1939. Business Cycles. Cambridge: McGraw-Hill.
90.
SchumpeterJ. A.1942. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
91.
SebastianiM.1989. Kalecki and Marx on effective demand. Atlantic Economic Journal17 (4): 22–28.
92.
SilverbergG.VerspagenB.2005. Evolutionary theorizing on economic growth. In The Evolutionary Foundations of Economics, ed. DopferK. 506–39. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
93.
SmithK.2000. Innovation as a systemic phenomenon: Rethinking the role of policy. Enterprise and Innovation Management Studies1 (1): 73–102.
94.
SmithT.2010. Technological change in capitalism: Some Marxian themes. Cambridge Journal of Economics34:203–12.
95.
SoeteL. G.2013. Is innovation always good? In Innovation Studies: Evolution and Future Challenges, ed. FagerbergJ.MartinB.AndersenE. S.: 134–146. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
96.
StonemanP., ed. 1995. Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
97.
VerspagenB.2002. Evolutionary macroeconomics: A synthesis between neo-Schumpeterian and post-Keynesian lines of thought. The Electronic Journal of Evolutionary Modeling and Economic Dynamics, No. 1007.http://www.e-jemed.org/1007/index.php.
98.
VerspagenB.2005. Innovation and economic growth. In The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, ed. FagerbergJ.MoweryD.NelsonR., 487–13. New York: Oxford University Press.
99.
VivarelliM.1995. The Economics of Technology and Employment. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
100.
VivarelliM.2013. Technology, employment and skills: An interpretative framework. Eurasian Business Review3 (1): 66–89.
101.
VivarelliM.PiantaM., eds. 2000. The Employment Impact of Innovation: Evidence and Policy. London: Routledge.
102.
WinterS.2014. The future of evolutionary economics: Can we break out of the beachhead?Journal of Institutional Economics10 (4): 613–44.
103.
WittU.2001a. Economic growth—What happens on the demand side? Introduction. Journal of Evolutionary Economics11:1–5.
104.
WittU.2001b. Learning to consume—A theory of wants and the growth of demand. Journal of Evolutionary Economics11:23–36.
105.
WittU.2013. Competition as an ambiguous discovery procedure: A reappraisal of Hayek’s epistemic market liberalism. Economics & Philosophy29 (1): 121–38.
