This article examines the Coalition Government’s ‘Tech City’ proposals for East London. The Government wants to support the nascent tech cluster in East London, encourage inward investment, and develop the post-2012 Olympic Park into a high-tech hub. After examining the initiative in more detail, the article moves on to discuss why, and how, policy should support the development of high-tech industries in East London. It draws on location and cluster theory, the experience of initiatives to support high-tech clusters in other countries, and an examination of London’s existing strengths in order to suggest a realistic and evidence-based way forward.
BresnahanTGambardellaA. Old-economy inputs for new-economy outcomes: What have we learned? In: BresnahanTGambardellaA (eds) (2004) Building High-Tech Clusters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press331–358.
2.
ChristophersonSClarkJ (2007) Remaking Regional Economies: Power, Labour and Firm Strategies in the Knowledge Economy. Abingdon: Routledge.
3.
CurridE (2007) The Warhol Economy: How Fashion, Art, and Music Drive New York City. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
DurantonGPugaD (2001) Nursery cities: Urban diversity, process innovation and the life cycle of products. American Economic Review91(5): 1454–1477.
6.
Gibbon C (2010) London and the digital and media industries: Made for each other. In: BOP Consulting In Place and FutureCity (eds) Tech City: Creating a New Digital and Media Cluster in London's East End. London: BOP, 2–3.
7.
GlaeserE (2008) Cities, Agglomeration and Spatial Equilibrium. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8.
HelmersC (2010) Choose the neighbour before the house: Agglomeration externalities in UK science parks. SERC Urban and Regional Economics Seminar5 November. London: LSE.
9.
HuttonT (2008) The New Economy of the Inner City: Restructuring, Regeneration and Dislocation in the Twenty-First Century Metropolis. Abingdon: Routledge.
10.
JacobsJ (1970) The Economy of Cities. London: Vintage.
11.
MarkoffJ (2005) What the Dormouse Said: How the Sixties Counterculture Shaped the Personal Computer Industry. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
12.
MartinRSunleyP (2003) Deconstructing clusters: Chaotic concept or policy panacea?Journal of Economic Geography3(1): 5–35.
13.
MeloPGrahamDNolandR (2009) A meta-analysis of estimates of urban agglomeration economies. Regional Science and Urban Economics39(3): 332–342.
14.
NathanMLeeN (2011) Does Cultural Diversity Help Innovation in Cities? Evidence from London Firms. Spatial Economics Research Centre Discussion Paper SERCDP0069. London: LSE.
15.
OvermanHGibbonsSTucciA (2009) The Case for Agglomeration Economies. Manchester: Manchester Independent Economic Review (MIER).
16.
PorterM (1990) The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: Free Press.
17.
PrattAJeffcutP (2009) Creativity, Innovation and the Cultural Economy. Abingdon: Routledge.
18.
ReedH (2010) Reinventing Venture Capital: Towards a New Economic Settlement. London: Demos.
19.
Rode P, Nathan M, von Streit A, et al. (2010) Munich Metropolitan Region: Staying Ahead on Innovation. LSE Cities/Brookings Metro Program Next Urban Economy Report. London: LSE. Available at: http://globalmetrosummit.net/research/next-urban-economy/.
20.
SaxenianA-L (1994) Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21.
SaxenianA-L (2006) The New Argonauts: Regional Advantage in a Global Economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22.
StorperM (2011) Why do regions develop and change? The challenge for geography and economics. Journal of Economic Geography11(2): 333–346.
23.
van der LindeC. The demography of clusters: Findings from the cluster meta-study. In: BroeckerJDohseDSoltwedelR (eds) (2003) Innovation Clusters and Interregional Competition. Berlin: Springer130–149.
24.
Van Reenen J (2011) Where is Future Growth Going to Come From? LSE Works Lecture, 17 February, London.
25.
Wadhwa V (2010) Okinawa’s Doomed Innovation Experiment. BusinessWeek, 25 October.
