In a seminal paper on Marxian business cycle theory, Goodwin (1967) presented a model which assumed that a higher wage share leads to lower investment and thus a general economic slowdown. In contrast Kalecki (1971) was arguing that a higher wage share would have an expansionary effect because the consumption propensity out of wage income is higher than that out of profit income. Based on a general model that allows for wage-led as well as profit-led demand regimes, this paper estimates the effects of a change in the wage share on aggregate private domestic demand with quarterly data for 12 OECD countries.
Barbosa-FilhoN.TaylorL.2006. Distributive and demand cycles in the US economy – a structuralist Goodwin model. Metroeconomica57 (3): 389-411.
2.
BhaduriA.MarglinS.1990. Unemployment and the real wage: The economic basis for contesting political ideologies. Cambridge Journal of Economics14: 375-93.
3.
BleckerR.1989. International competition, income distribution and economic growth. Cambridge Journal of Economics13: 395-412.
4.
BleckerR.1999. Kaleckian macromodels for open economies. In Foundations of international economics: Post Keynesian perspectives, ed. DeprezJ.HarveyJ.London and New York: Routledge.
5.
BleckerR.2002. Distribution, demand and growth in neo-Kaleckian macro-models. In The economics of demand-led growth, ed. SetterfieldM.Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
6.
BowlesS.BoyerR.1995. Wages, aggregate demand, and employment in an open economy: An empirical investigation. In Macroeconomic policy after the conservative era. Studies in investment, saving and finance, ed. EpsteinG.GintisH.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7.
CrottyJ.GoldsteinJ.1992. A Marxian-Keynesian theory of investment demand. In Empirical evidence: International perspectives on profitability and accumulation, ed. MoseleyF.WolffE.Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
8.
EdererS.StockhammerE.2007. Wages and aggregate demand in France: An empirical investigation. In Money, distribution, and economic policy – alternatives to orthodox macroeconomics. Ed. HeinE.TrugerA.Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
9.
DemirF.2009. Financial liberalization, private investment and portfolio choice: Financialization of real sectors in emerging markets. Journal of Development Economics88: 314-24.
10.
FlaschelP.ProanoC.2007. AS-AD disequilibrium dynamics and the Taylor interest rate policy rule: Euro-area based estimation and simulation. In Aspects of modern monetary and macroeconomic policies, ed. ArestisP.HeinE.Le HeronE.Houndsmill, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.
11.
GoldsteinJ. P.1999. Predator-prey model estimates of the cyclical profit squeeze. Metroeconomica50 (2): 139-73.
12.
GoodwinR. M.1967. A growth cycle. In Socialism, capitalism and economic growth, ed. FeinsteinC. H.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
GoodwinR. M.1986. The M-K-S system: The functioning and evolution of capitalism. In The economic law of motion of modern society, ed. WagenerH.DruckerJ. Reprinted in Essays in nonlinear economic dynamics, ed. GoodwinR.Frankfurt: Verlag Peter Lang.
14.
HarvieD.2000. Testing Goodwin: Growth cycles in ten OECD economies. Cambridge Journal of Economics24: 349-76.
15.
HeinE.VogelL.2008. Distribution and growth reconsidered – empirical results for six OECD countries. Cambridge Journal of Economics32: 479-511.
16.
KaleckiM.1954. Theory of economic dynamics. Reprinted in Collected works of Michal Kalecki, vol. 1, ed. OsiatynskiJ.Oxford: Clarendon Press.
17.
MarglinS.BhaduriA.1990. Profit squeeze and Keynesian theory. In The golden age of capitalism. Reinterpreting the postwar experience, ed. MarglinS.SchorJ.Oxford: Clarendon Press.
18.
MarxK.1976. Capital. A critique of political economy, vol. I. London: Penguin Books.
19.
MohunS.VenezianiR.2008. Goodwin cycles and the U.S. economy 1948-2004. In Mathematical economics and the dynamics of capitalism, ed. FlaschelP.LandesmannM., 107-30. London and New York: Routledge.
20.
NaastepadC. W. M.StormS.2006/7. OECD demand regimes (1960-2000). Journal of Post-Keynesian Economics29: 213-48.
21.
OnaranÖ.StockhammerE.2005. Two different export-oriented growth strategies: Accumulation and distribution a la Turca and a la South Korea. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade41 (1): 65-89.
22.
OnaranÖ.StockhammerE.GraflL.2009. The finance-dominated growth regime, distribution, and aggregate demand in the US. Vienna University of Economics & B.A. Dept. of EconomicsWorking Paper No. 126.
23.
OrhangaziÖ.2008. Financialisation and capital accumulation in the non-financial corporate sector: A theoretical and empirical investigation on the US economy: 1973–2003. Cambridge Journal of Economics32: 863–86.
24.
RowthornR.[1977]1980. Conflict, inflation and money. Cambridge Journal of Economics1 (3). Reprinted in Capitalism, conflict and inflation, ed. RowthornB.London: Lawrence and Wishart.
25.
StockhammerE.2004. Financialization and the slowdown of accumulation. Cambridge Journal of Economics28 (5): 719-41.
26.
StockhammerE.OnaranÖ.EdererS.2009. Functional income distribution and aggregate demand in the euro area. Cambridge Journal of Economics33 (1): 139-59.
27.
StockhammerE.OnaranÖ.2004. Accumulation, distribution and employment: A structural VAR approach to a Kaleckian macro-model. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics (15): 421-47.
28.
StockhammerE.HeinE.GraflL.2011. Globalization and the effects of changes in functional income distribution on aggregate demand in Germany. International Review of Applied Economics, 25 (1): 1-23.
29.
StockhammerE.EdererS.2008. Demand effects of a falling wage share in Austria. Empirica35 (5): 481-502.
30.
van TreeckT.2008. Reconsidering the investment-profit nexus in finance-led economies: An ARDL-based approach. Metroeconomica59 (4): 371-404.
