This paper reviews the historical roots of Marx's labor theory of value and some contemporary contributions to the critique of this theory. Modern commentary on Marx's labor theory of value based on dual system of parallel prices and embodied labor coefficients loses sight of the theory's roots in the philosophy of historical materialism and its function as a theory of money. Recently developed empirical single system approaches, including the New Interpretation that identifies the monetary expression of labor time with the ratio of money value added to living productive labor expended in its production, address these problems, and open the possibility of a progressive research program based on Marx's theory.
Alemi, Piruz. 1997. Circuits of Capital, 1947-1995. Ph.D. thesis, New School for Social Resarch.
2.
Azari, Hamid. 1996. Measurement Techniques for the Circuits of Capital. Ph.D. thesis, University of Utah.
3.
Baumol, William J.1974. The Transformation of Values: What Marx "Really" Meant (an Interpretation). Journal of Economic Literature12: 51-62.
4.
Bortkiewicz, L. von. 1952. Value and Price in the Marxian System. International Economic Papers 1952 (2): 5-60.
5.
Brinkman, Robert F. 1997. Derivation of the New Interpretation of the Labor Theory of Value. Unpublished ms.
6.
Cockshott, Paul, Allin Cottrell, and Greg Michaelson. 1995. Testing Marx: Some New Results from U.K. Data. Capital and Class 55.
7.
Dumenil, Gerard. 1980. De la Valeur aux Prix de Production. Paris: Economica.
8.
Dumenil, Gerard. 1983. Beyond the Transformation Riddle: A Labor Theory of Value. Science and Society47 (4): 427-450.
9.
Dumenil, Gerard and Dominique Levy. 1994. The Economics of the Profit Rate. Brookfield, Vt.: Edward Elgar.
10.
Ernst, John. 1982. Simultaneous Valuation Extirpated: A Contribution to the Critique of the Neo-Ricardian Concept of Value. Review of Radical Political Economics14 (2): 85-94.
11.
Foley, Duncan K.1982a. Realization and Accumulation in a Marxian Model of the Circuit of Capital. Journal of Economic Theory28 (2): 300-319.
12.
Foley, Duncan K.1982b. The Value of Money, the Value of Labor Power, and the Marxian Transformation Problem. Review of Radical Political Economics14 (2): 37-47.
Foley, Duncan K.Money, Accumulation, and Crisis. New York, N.Y.: Harwood Academic.
15.
Freeman, Alan. 1996a.The Psychopathology of Walrasian Marxism. In Freeman and Carchedi (eds.). Pp. 1-28.
16.
Freeman, Alan1996b. Price, Value, and Profit-a Continuous, General, Treatment. In Freeman and Carchedi (eds.). Pp. 225-279.
17.
Freeman, Alan and Guglielmo Carchedi, eds. 1996. Marx and NonEquilibrium Economics. Brookfield, Vt.: Edward Elgar.
18.
Glick, Mark and Hans Ehrbar. 1987. The Transformation Problem: An Obituary. Australian Economic Papers26 (49): 294-317.
19.
Kliman, Andrew. 1996. A Value-Theoretic Critique of the Okishio Theorem. In Freemand and Carchedi (eds.). Pp. 206-224.
20.
Lipietz, Alan. 1982. The "So-Called Transformation Problem" Revisited. Journal of Economic Theory26: 59-88.
21.
Mage, Shane. 1963. The Law of the Falling Tendency of the Rate of Profit: Its Place in the Marxian Theoretical System and Relevance to the United States. Ph.D. thesis, Columbia University.
22.
Marx, Karl. 1859. A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy. M. Dobb (ed.). Reprint 1970. New York, N.Y.: International Publishers.
23.
Marx, Karl. 1867. Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. Volume I, The Process of Production of Capital. F. Engels (ed.). Reprint 1967. New York, N.Y.: International Publishers.
24.
Marx, Karl. 1893. Capital. A Critique of Political Economy. Volume II, The Process of Circulation of Capital. F. Engels (ed.). Reprint 1967. New York, N.Y.: International Publishers.
25.
Marx, Karl. 1894. Capital. A Critique of Political Economy. Volume III, The Process of Capitalist Production as a Whole. F. Engels (ed.). Reprint 1967. New York, N.Y.: International Publishers.
26.
Matthews, Peter H. 1995. Essays on the Analytical Foundations of the Classical Tradition. Ph.D. thesis, Yale University.
27.
McGlone, Ted and Andrew Kliman. 1996. One System or Two? The Transformation of Values into Prices of Production Versus the Transformation Problem. In Freeman and Carchedi (eds.). Pp. 29-48.
28.
Mohun, Simon. 1994. A Re(in)statement of the Labour Theory of Value. Cambridge Journal of Economics18: 391-412.
29.
Morishima, Michio. 1973. Marx's Economics: A Dual Theory of Value and Growth. Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press.
30.
Moseley, Fred. 1990. the Decline of the Rate of Profit in the Postwar U.S. Economy: An Alternative Marxist Explanation. Review of Radical Political Economics22 (2-3): 17-37.
31.
Ochoa, E.1988. Values, Prices, and Wage Profit Curves in the U.S. Economy. Cambridge Journal of Economics13: 413-430.
32.
Ramos-Martinez, Alejandro and Adolfo Rodriguez-Herrera. 1996. The Transformation of Values into Prices of Production: A Different Reading of Marx's Text. In Freeman and Carchedi (eds.). Pp. 49-76.
33.
Ricardo, David. 1817. The Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. Reprint 1973. New York, N.Y.: E.P. Dutton.
34.
Robinson, Joan. 1965. A Reconsideration of the Labour Theory of Value. In Collected Economic Papers III. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35.
Roemer, John. 1981. Analytical Foundations of Marxian Economic Theory. Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press.
36.
Roemer, John. 1990. Review of Duncan K. Foley, Understanding Capital. Journal of Economic Literature27 (4): 1727-1730.
37.
Saad-Filho, Alfredo. 1996. The Value of Money, the Value of Labour Power and the Net Profit: An Appraisal of the "New Approach" to the Transformation Problem. In Freeman and Carchedi (eds.). Pp. 116-135.
38.
Samuelson, Paul A.1971. Understanding the Marxian Notion of Exploitation: A Summary of the So-Called "Transformation Problem" Between Marxian Values and Competitive Prices. Journal of Economic Literature9 (2): 399-431.
39.
Schefold, Bertram. 1973. Wert and Preis in der Maxistischen and Neokeynesianischen Akkumulationstheorie. Mehrwet, Beitrdge zur Kritik der Politischen Okonomie (Erlangen: Politladen) 2: 125-75.
40.
Senchak, Andrew. 1983. United States Capital Accumulation, 1963-1977. Ph.D. thesis, Columbia University.
41.
Seton, Francis. 1957. The "Transformation Problem."Review of Economic Studies24: 149-160.
42.
Shaikh, Anwar M. and E. Ahmet Tonak. 1994. Measuring the Wealth of Nations: The Political Economy of National Accounts. New York, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.
43.
Smith, Adam. 1776. The Wealth of Nations. E. Cannan (ed.). Reprint 1937. New York, N.Y.: Random House Modem Library.
44.
Steedman, Ian. 1977. Marx after Sraffa. London: New Left Books.
45.
Sweezy, Paul. 1970. The Theory of Capitalist Development: Principles of Marxian Political Economy. New York, N.Y.: Modem Reader Paperbacks.
46.
Tugan-Baranovsky, M.1905. Theoretische Grundlagen des Marxismus. Leipzig: Duncker & Humbolt.
47.
Wolff, Edward N.1975. The Rate of Surplus Value in Puerto Rico. Journal of Political Economy83: 935-949.
48.
Wolff, Edward N.1987. Growth, Accumulation, and Unproductive Activity: An Analysis of the Postwar U.S. Economy. New York, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.
49.
Wolff, Richard, Antonio Callari, and Bruce Roberts. 1982. Marx's (not Ricardo's) "Transformation Problem": A Radical Reconceptualization. History of Political Economy14 (4): 564-582.
