Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background

Dermatomyositis (DM) is an idiopathic immune-mediated myopathy, and may involve many organs, including muscles, skin and lungs. Myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSAs) are a useful aid in diagnosis DM and identifying its clinical subtype. During the COVID-19 pandemic, several studies found clinical similarities regarding lung involvement in both COVID-19 and DM. Such similarities have prompted speculation of a common pathogenetic mechanism. Indeed, viral infections are well-known triggers of autoimmune diseases. This prompted us to investigate whether circulating MSAs could be markers of the severity of lung involvement and of clinical outcome in COVID-19 patients. Moreover, we investigated the presence of cutaneous signs of DM in COVID-19 patients.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study on 178 hospitalized patients affected by COVID-19. The diagnosis was confirmed by naso-pharyngeal swab positivity for SARS-CoV-2. The severity of lung involvement was assessed by assigning to each patient a radiological score ranging from 1 to 4, based on chest imaging (chest X-rays or CT scans). Serum samples were tested for MSAs.

Results

Anti-PL-7 antibodies were detected in 10.1% of patients and were found to be associated with an increased risk of severe pulmonary involvement (p = 0.019) and a worse prognosis in COVID-19 patients. Cutaneous lesions were observed in 26.4% of patients. However, none were cutaneous manifestations of DM.

Conclusions

The detection of anti-PL7 antibodies might predict severe pulmonary involvement and a worse prognosis in COVID-19 patients.

Keywords

dermatomyositis COVID-19 patients myositis specific autoantibodies prognosis anti-PL7 antibodies

Introduction

Dermatomyositis (DM) is an immune-mediated idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM). IIM is a group of rare and clinically heterogenous connective tissue diseases that are characterized by the inflammation of many organs and tissues, including muscles, skin and lungs.¹ Dermatological signs of DM comprise: periorbital heliotrope rash, purplish papules and plaques in the dorsal region of the metacarpo-phalangeal or interphalangeal joints (Gottron's papules), fissured palmar fingertips (mechanic's hands), and erythema of the face, chest (V-sign) and back (shawl sign).¹ By contrast, skin manifestations of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) include chilblain-like lesions, maculo-papular eruptions, urticarial eruptions, vesicular eruptions, erythema multiforme (EM)-like lesions, livedo and necrosis.² Other skin findings in COVID-19 patients have been described in association with a multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) and, rarely, with a multisystem inflammatory syndrome in adults (MIS-A).² Other manifestations, such as pityriasis rosea or shingles, have also been reported.^2,3 Similar cutaneous manifestations have also been reported after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination.^4,5 Typically, in DM the proximal muscles of the upper and lower limbs are affected. In some cases, pulmonary involvement may lead to nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP).⁶

Myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSAs) are useful tools for the diagnosis and classification of DM. Indeed, various MSAs are described in association with specific clinical phenotypes of DM.⁶ Specifically, anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 (anti-MDA5) antibodies are associated with more aggressive and rapidly progressive lung involvement, higher mortality and the absence of myopathy.¹ Other specific MSAs, including anti-synthetase antibodies, anti-histidyl-tRNA synthetase antibody (anti-Jo1), anti-threonyl-tRNA synthetase (anti-PL7), anti-alanyl-tRNA synthetase (anti-PL12), anti-isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase (anti-OJ) and anti-glycyl-tRNA synthetase (anti-EJ), are associated with the anti-synthetase antibody syndrome, which is characterized by severe interstitial lung involvement, high fever, myositis, polyarthritis and absence of cutaneous signs.⁷

During the COVID-19 pandemic, cases of overlap between COVID-19 and DM were described in several case reports.^8–15 Moreover, a recent retrospective study revealed a strong temporal relationship between DM symptoms and COVID-19 infection or vaccination in patients with DM evaluated in a rheumatology clinic during the pandemic.¹⁶ Cases of DM following COVID-19 or COVID-19 vaccination have been reported.^17,18 Notably, lung involvement in SARS-CoV2 pneumonia may resemble the interstitial pneumonia and the ground glass opacifications found in patients affected by DM with circulating anti-MDA5 antibodies.¹⁹ Similar features of pulmonary involvement in these two diseases have prompted speculation that they share a common pathogenetic mechanism. Although the pathogenesis of DM is still unclear, it is likely to be associated to abnormal complement activation and excessive type-I interferon (IFN) release. Indeed, it has been found that the cytokine cascade in COVID-19 is similar to that observed in DM, and that it involves various cytokines, including interferon-gamma (INF-γ), interleukin 8 (IL-8) and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1).²⁰ Furthermore, IFN has proved to be involved in organ damage in COVID-19 patients, and also to play a major role in damage to muscle fibers in DM.²¹ Megremis et al. identified three immunogenic linear epitopes with high sequence identity to SARS-CoV-2 proteins in patients with autoimmune DM. ²² It can therefore be speculated that exposure to SARS-CoV-2 may trigger the development of DM.

The prevalence of circulating MSAs in COVID-19 patients has not yet been thoroughly investigated. Since specific types of MSAs are associated to lung involvement in patients affected by DM, given the similarities of pneumonia in COVID-19 patients and DM patients, and considering the reported cases of DM following COVID-19 or SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, we decided to investigate whether circulating MSAs and myositis-associated antibodies (MAAs) could be markers of the severity of lung involvement and of clinical outcome in COVID-19 patients. Moreover, we investigated whether these patients presented cutaneous signs of dermatomyositis.

Methods

Study population

We conducted a retrospective cohort study on patients affected by COVID-19 who were hospitalized between March and May 2020 at the Ospedale Policlinico San Martino IRCCS, in Genoa, Italy. All patients tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 on nasopharyngeal swab samples and clinically presented full-blown COVID-19. No other specific inclusion or exclusion criteria were adopted in selecting the sample. Demographics, pre-existing comorbidities and the course of the disease during hospitalization were studied by retrospectively analyzing clinical records. All patients were investigated for cutaneous manifestations of DM and COVID-19. Local ethics committee approval was obtained (N. CER Liguria 521/2020). Since the study was conducted during the COVID-19 global pandemic and was retrospective, we encountered difficulties in collecting written informed consent from all patients. Our study complied with the “Standards for reporting qualitative research (SRQS)” guidelines.²³

Radiological assessment

The patients’ pulmonary involvement was assessed by means of either chest X-rays or computed tomography (CT) scans, performed during hospitalization. Chest CT scan images of all patients were not available, as only chest X-rays were mainly performed at the beginning of the pandemic, owing to the simplicity and rapidity of the method. In order to evaluate the severity of lung involvement, we created an ad hoc radiological severity score based on the literature^24–28; this was used to evaluate both X-rays and CT scans.

The radiological score ranged from 1 to 4, as follows (Table 2):

• 1: No focal parenchymal lesions

• 2: Nuanced parenchymal thickening

• 3: Extensive bilateral lung parenchymal thickening

• 4: Ground glass opacities

Laboratory analysis

Frozen serum samples, which were used for MSA and MAA titration, were obtained within the first 10 days of the patients’ hospitalization. Other abnormalities in laboratory parameters were also evaluated on the same serum samples. Line blot assay (EUROLINE Profile Autoimmune Inflammatory Myopathies 16 Ag (IgG); Euroimmun Mediziniske Labordiagnostika, Germany) was used to detect MSAs [anti-OJ, anti-EJ, anti-PL-12, anti-PL-7, anti-signal recognition particle (anti-SRP), anti-Jo-1, anti-small ubiquitin-like modifier activating enzyme 1 (anti-SAE1), anti-nuclear matrix protein 2 (anti-NXP2), anti-MDA5, anti-transcriptional intermediary factor 1-γ (anti-TIF1-γ), anti-Mi-2β and Mi-2α antibodies] and MAAs (anti-Ro-52, anti-Ku, anti-polymyositis/Scl (PM-Scl) 75 and anti-PM-Scl-100) The line blot assay for MSA detection has proved valid for MSA in several unrelated studies.^29–32 The specificity of this test ranges between 97% and 100%.³²

Results were expressed as arbitrary units, with a cut-off positivity according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables were summarized as mean values with standard deviation and median values with range. Categorical data were expressed as frequencies and percentages. The radiological score was categorized as “normal” or “mild” if both lungs had a radiological score <4, and as “severe” if the radiological score was ≥4. Univariate and a subsequent logistic regression model were run to identify autoantibodies that predicted worse radiological scores, after adjusting for age and sex.

Results

We enrolled 178 COVID-19 patients. Demographics and clinical characteristics of the cohort are reported in Table 1. Their mean age was 68.9 years (range 27–98 years), the female-to-male ratio was 1:2, and 47 (26.40%) patients presented cutaneous lesions. Chest imaging revealed pneumonia in 92.7% of the patients, with a median radiological score of 1.5. Fifty-one (28.7%) patients died. The prevalence of myositis-specific autoantibodies is reported in Table 2. The most commonly detected autoantibody was anti-PL-7 (10.1%), followed by anti-SRP (7.9%), anti-PM 75 and anti-Ku (5.6%). Anti-EJ autoantibody was not identified in any patient. Anti-PL-7 antibody was the only MSA associated with an increased risk of severe pulmonary involvement, namely a radiological score ≥ 4 (OR: 2.82; 95%. CI: 1.03 – 7.77; p = 0.019) (Figure 1).

Table 1.

Baseline and clinical characteristics.


Age		68.9 ± 15.58
Age		68.5 (27.0 - 98.0)
Sex	Female	65 (36.5%)
Sex	Male	113 (63.5%)
Cutaneous manifestations	No	131 (73.6%)
Cutaneous manifestations	Yes	47 (26.40%)
Pneumonia	No	13 (7.3%)
Pneumonia	Yes	165 (92.7%)
Radiological score (n° of patients)	4 - ground glass opacities	53 (29.8%)
	3 - extensive bilateral lung parenchymal thickening	77 (43.3%)
	2 - nuanced parenchymal thickening	33 (18.5%)
	1 - No focal parenchymal lesions	15 (8.4%)
Radiological score (median)		2.0 ± 1.43
Radiological score (median)		1.5 (1.0 – 5.0)
Outcome	Discharged	127 (71.3%)
Outcome	Deceased	51 (28.7%)

Results are reported as mean ± standard deviation and median with range or frequency and percentage.

Table 2.

Univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression model for identifying autoantibodies predicting severe radiological score.

Auto-antibody		Radiological score ≥4 (50% involvement) for at least one lung	Radiological score <4 for both lungs	Univariate	Multivariate
Myositis specific antibodies
Anti-OJ	Negative	48 (28.2%)	122 (71.8%)	0.36
Anti-OJ	Positive	4 (50.0%)	4 (50.0%)	0.36
Anti-EJ	Negative	52 (29.2%)	126 (70.8%)	—
Anti-EJ	Positive	0 (0.0%)	0 (0.0%)	—
Anti-PL-12	Negative	48 (28.2%)	122 (71.8%)	0.36
Anti-PL-12	Positive	4 (50.0%)	4 (50.0%)	0.36
Anti-PL-7	Negative	42 (26.3%)	118 (73.8%)	0.020	Ref. 2.82 (1.03 – 7.77); 0.019
Anti-PL-7	Positive	10 (55.6%)	8 (44.4%)	0.020
Anti-SRP	Negative	47 (28.7%)	117 (71.3%)	0.80
Anti-SRP	Positive	5 (35.7%)	9 (64.3%)	0.80
Anti- Jo-1	Negative	50 (29.1%)	122 (70.9%)	0.99
Anti- Jo-1	Positive	2 (33.3%)	4 (66.7%)	0.99
Anti-SAE1	Negative	50 (28.9%)	123 (71.1%)	0.63
Anti-SAE1	Positive	2 (40.0%)	3 (60.0%)	0.63
Anti-NXP2	Negative	50 (28.6%)	125 (71.4%)	0.09^
Anti-NXP2	Positive	2 (100.0%)	0 (0.0%)	0.09^
Anti-MDA5	Negative	51 (29.0%)	125 (71.0%)	0.50
Anti-MDA5	Positive	1 (50.0%)	1 (50.0%)	0.50
Anti-TIF-1γ	Negative	52 (29.5%)	124 (70.5%)	0.99
Anti-TIF-1γ	Positive	0 (0.0%)	2 (100.0%)	0.99
Anti-Mi-2β	Negative	51 (29.8%)	120 (70.2%)	0.64
Anti-Mi-2β	Positive	1 (14.3%)	6 (85.7%)	0.64
Anti-Mi-1α	Negative	51 (29.8%)	120 (70.2%)	0.79
Anti-Mi-1α	Positive	1 (14.3%)	6 (85.7%)	0.79
Myositis associated antibodies
Anti-Ro-52	Negative	50 (28.7%)	124 (71.3%)	0.58
Anti-Ro-52	Positive	2 (50.0%)	2 (50.0%)	0.58
Anti-Ku	Negative	49 (29.2%)	119 (70.8%)	0.99
Anti-Ku	Positive	3 (30.0%)	7 (70.0%)	0.99
Anti-PM-Scl-75	Negative	48 (28.6%)	120 (71.4%)	0.68
Anti-PM-Scl-75	Positive	4 (40.0%)	6 (60.0%)	0.68
Anti-PM-Scl-100	Negative	51 (29.3%)	123 (70.7%)	0.99
Anti-PM-Scl-100	Positive	1 (25.0%)	3 (75.0%)	0.99

Results are reported as count with frequency and percentage. The analysis has been adjusted for age and sex.

Score Legend: 1- No focal parenchymal lesions; 2 - Nuanced parenchymal thickening; 3-Extensive bilateral lung parenchymal thickening; 4- Ground glass opacities.

Anti-OJ: anti-isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase; Anti-EJ: anti-glycyl-tRNA synthetase; Anti-PL-12: anti-alanyl-tRNA synthetase; Anti-PL-7: anti-threonyl-tRNA synthetase; Anti-SRP: anti-signal recognition particle; Anti-Jo-1: anti-histidyl-tRNA synthetase antibody; Anti-SAE1: anti-small ubiquitin-like modifier activating enzyme 1, Anti-NXP2: anti-nuclear matrix protein 2; Anti-MDA5: anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5; Anti-TIF-1γ: anti-transcriptional intermediary factor 1-γ, Anti-PM-Scl-75: anti- polymyositis/Scl 75, Anti-PM-Scl-100: anti- polymyositis/Scl 100.

Figure 1.

Anti-PL-7 antibody is the only myositis-specific autoantibody associated with an increased risk of a severe lung involvement. Anti-PL-7: anti-threonyl-tRNA synthetase.

We observed cutaneous manifestations in 47/178 patients (26.40%), as shown in Table 3. Specifically, a maculo-papular rash was observed in 9 patients (5.05%), livedo reticularis in 9 patients (5.05%), bedsores in 9 patients (5.05%), and acrocyanosis in 1 patient (0.56%). Other cutaneous signs included multiple hematomas, subcutaneous emphysema, stasis edema, skin xerosis, enanthema, and atopic dermatitis flare. No skin findings of DM were observed.

Table 3.

Cutaneous manifestations in 178 patients.

Maculo papular rash	9 (5.05%)
Livedo reticularis	9 (5.05%)
Bedsores	9 (5.05%)
Acrocyanosis	1 (0.56%)
Hematomas	2 (1.12%)
Subcutaneous emphysema	1 (0.56%)
Stasis edema	6 (3.37%)
Skin xerosis	5 (2.81%)
Enanthema	3 (1.68%)
Atopic dermatitis flare up	2 (1.12%)
Total cutaneous manifestations observed	47 (26.40%)

No typical cutaneous sings of DM were found in Covid-19 patients.

Discussion

The possible link between SARS-CoV-2 infection and autoimmunity has been reported in the literature. It is, indeed, well known that environmental factors, such as viral, bacterial and parasitic infections, may trigger or exacerbate autoimmune diseases, especially in genetically susceptible individuals.³³ In particular, autoimmunity can be induced by viruses in many ways: via molecular mimicry, epitope spreading, bystander activation and immortalization of infected B cells. For example, in chronic Epstein-Barr virus infection, the reactivation of the virus may be associated with the onset of various autoimmune diseases, including DM.³⁴

Furthermore, vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 has also been reported to trigger the onset of autoimmune conditions, including myocarditis, IgA vasculitis and autoimmune liver diseases.³⁵ Moreover, epidemiological data have shown that DM is mostly diagnosed at specific times of the year, with seasonal clustering, which suggests that viral or bacterial infections might be common triggers for DM.³⁶

In our study, we found several COVID-19 patients with positivity to MSAs. However, we did not observe skin manifestations typical of DM nor severe muscle involvement. On the other hand, the pulmonary involvement we observed in our patients hospitalized for SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia was very similar to that described in patients with DM, with a typical interstitial pattern.

Recently, cases of DM with anti-MDA5-associated autoantibodies and lung injury have been described in association with SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination.^36–38 Anti-MDA5 autoantibodies are typically associated with an amyopathic or hypomyopathic form of DM, extensive and rapid lung involvement and a poor prognosis.^1,39 Moreover, a few cases of anti-synthetase antibody syndrome with severe pulmonary involvement following SARS-CoV-2 infection have also been reported.^40,41 A recent case series collected 12 cases of middle-aged women affected by anti-synthetase syndrome, in whom SARS-CoV-2 infection triggered a flare of their underlying autoimmune condition.⁴² Three of the 12 patients had circulating anti-PL-7 autoantibodies and radiological sings of NSIP and ground glass opacities.⁴¹ A case of anti-synthetase syndrome that occurred after SARS-CoV-2 infection was also reported a in a 62-year-old man with positive anti-Jo1 autoantibodies.⁴⁰ Recently, in patients referred to an immunology department for IIM, Garcia-Bravo et al. observed a higher prevalence of MSAs during the COVID-19 pandemic and the SARS-CoV-2 vaccination period than in the three years prior to the pandemic.⁴³ MSAs were associated to the HLA DRB1* risk allele.³⁸ Differential profiles of MSA specificity were observed: mainly anti-MDA5 in 2020 and anti-RNA-synthetases in 2021. Thus, the authors also hypothesized that the increased cases of anti-MDA5 positivity observed in 2020 could be attributed to recognition of the coronavirus through RNA sensors, inducing an antiviral response by producing INFs and TNF. By contrast, in 2021, the increased incidence of detection of anti-PL-7 and anti-PL12 antibodies could suggest that SARS-CoV-2 vaccination might induce a reaction against Spike 1 proteins and other tissue antigens.⁴³ However, the possible association between a specific antibody positivity and the severity of the COVID-19 patient’s prognosis had not yet been investigated.

Our study documented a close link between positivity for the myositis-specific antibody anti-PL-7, the severity of pulmonary involvement in COVID-19 patients and their poor prognosis. Indeed, not only was anti-PL7 the most commonly detected MSA (18/178 patients); it was also associated with a much higher risk of severe lung injury. By contrast, no association was found between other MSAs and an increased risk of severe lung injury.

Severe cases of SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia are associated to a massive inflammatory cascade.^20,44 It is possible that the inflammatory cascade induced in severe cases might also non-specifically trigger autoimmunity, which can result in full-blown DM or, in some cases, in a subclinical epiphenomenon of circulating autoantibodies. This hypothesis could possibly justify our findings.

The cutaneous manifestations we observed in 26.40% of patients mainly consisted of maculo-papular rashes, livedo reticularis, bedsores and acrocyanosis. These skin signs were probably attributable to nonspecific manifestations of vasculopathy in the context of a systemic viral infection, rather than to autoimmune processes.⁴⁵

Limitations

The main limitation of the present study was the absence of a control group of healthy individuals. Another limitation concerned the different types of radiological imaging analyzed. Indeed, owing to health emergency issues, not all patients underwent a chest CT scan. Furthermore, no data on previous autoimmune pathology or serology of our patients were available. Lastly, no sample size/power analysis was performed in this study, owing to its retrospective design and the low number of available sera collected during the pandemic.

Conclusion

On the basis of our findings, MSAs are not associated to cutaneous manifestations of DM in COVID-19 patients. However, positivity for anti-PL-7 antibodies were found to be associated to more severe pulmonary involvement and a worse prognosis in COVID-19 patients. It might be useful in the future to evaluate anti-PL7 antibody positivity in COVID-19 patients when making a prognosis. It would also be interesting to investigate other possible associations between dermatomyositis, autoimmune diseases and SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Footnotes

Author contributions

G.A.O.: conceived of the presented idea, contributed to the analysis of the results and to the writing of the manuscript. P.C.: carried out the line blot assays; E.C.C.: supervised and directed the project. G. G.: contributed to the analysis of the results and to the writing of the manuscript. A. G.: developed the radiological score and evaluated the chest X-rays and CT-scans; L. R.: developed the radiological score and evaluated the chest X-rays and CT-scans; I. S.: performed the statistical analysis. A.P.: supervised and directed the project.

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Ethical statement

ORCID iD

Giulia Gasparini

References

McPherson

Economidou

Liampas

, et al. (2022) Management of MDA-5 antibody positive clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis associated interstitial lung disease: a systematic review. Semin Arthritis Rheum 53: 151959.

Martora

Villani

Fabbrocini

, et al. (2023) COVID-19 and cutaneous manifestations: a review of the published literature. J Cosmet Dermatol 22(1): 4–10.

Martora

Picone

Fornaro

, et al. (2022) Can COVID-19 cause atypical forms of pityriasis rosea refractory to conventional therapies? J Med Virol 94(4): 1292–1293.

Picone

Martora

Fabbrocini

, et al. (2022) “Covid arm”: abnormal side effect after Moderna COVID-19 vaccine. Dermatol Ther 35(1): e15197.

Martora

Fabbrocini

Marasca

(2022) Pityriasis rosea after Moderna mRNA-1273 vaccine: a case series. Dermatol Ther 35(2): e15225.

DeWane

Waldman

(2020) Dermatomyositis: clinical features and pathogenesis. J Am Acad Dermatol 82(2): 267–281.

Gasparotto

Gatto

Saccon

, et al. (2019) Pulmonary involvement in antisynthetase syndrome. Curr Opin Rheumatol 31(6): 603–610.

Qian

(2022) COVID-19 disease and dermatomyositis: a mini-review. Front Immunol 12: 747116.

Zhang

Charmchi

Seidman

, et al. (2020) COVID-19-associated myositis with severe proximal and bulbar weakness. Muscle Nerve 62(3): E57–E60.

10.

Kogami

Suzuki

Nanjo

, et al. (2020) Complication of coronavirus disease 2019 during remission induction therapy against anti-MDA5 antibody-positive dermatomyositis. Rheumatology advances in practice 4(2): rkaa068.

11.

Cao

Zhang

Chu

, et al. (2020) COVID-19 or clinical amyopathic dermatomyositis associated rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease? A case report. BMC Pulm Med 20(1): 304.

12.

Borges

Godoy

Kahlow

(2021) Onset of dermatomyositis in close association with COVID-19-a first case reported. Rheumatology 60(SI): SI96.

13.

Quintana-Ortega

Remesal

Ruiz de Valbuena

, et al. (2021) Fatal outcome of anti-MDA5 juvenile dermatomyositis in a paediatric COVID-19 patient: a case report. Modern rheumatology case reports 5(1): 101–107.

14.

BVK

Seger

Kollmann

, et al. (2021) Dermatomyositis in a COVID-19 positive patient. JAAD case reports 13: 97–99.

15.

Giacaman

Mir Perelló

Rodríguez Diez

, et al. (2022) Juvenile dermatomyositis during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: acral and oral mucosal involvement. Actas Dermosifiliogr 22: S0001–S7310.

16.

Diaz-Menindez

, et al. (2023) Dermatomyositis in association with SARS-CoV-2 infection or COVID-19 vaccine. Arthritis Care Res 76(1): 98–104.

17.

Md Hadis

NIS

Mohd Yusoff

Muhamad

, et al. (2022) Post-COVID-19 dermatomyositis: a delayed reaction that evades early detection. Medeniyet medical journal 37(3): 289–292. DOI: 10.4274/MMJ.galenos.2022.55890.

18.

Gouda

Albasri

Alsaqabi

, et al. (2022) Dermatomyositis following BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccination. J Kor Med Sci 37(5): e32.

19.

Mehta

Machado

Gupta

(2021) Understanding and managing anti-MDA 5 dermatomyositis, including potential COVID-19 mimicry. Rheumatol Int 41(6): 1021–1036.

20.

Wang

, et al. (2021) Anti-MDA-5-positive dermatomyositis associated rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease, a virus-triggered autoimmune-like symptom? Rheumatology (Oxford) 60(9): 4428–4429.

21.

Tanboon

Nishino

(2021) COVID-19-associated myositis may be dermatomyositis. Muscle Nerve 63(1): E9–E10.

22.

Megremis

Walker

TDJ

, et al. (2020) Antibodies against immunogenic epitopes with high sequence identity to SARS-CoV-2 in patients with autoimmune dermatomyositis. Annals of the rheumatic diseases 79(10): 1383–1386.

23.

O'Brien

Harris

Beckman

, et al. (2014) Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med : Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges 89(9): 1245–1251.

24.

Francone

Iafrate

Masci

, et al. (2020) Chest CT score in COVID-19 patients: correlation with disease severity and short-term prognosis. Eur Radiol 30(12): 6808–6817.

25.

Abbasi

Akhavan

Ghamari Khameneh

, et al. (2021) Evaluation of the relationship between inpatient COVID-19 mortality and chest CT severity score. Am J Emerg Med 45: 458–463.

26.

Lieveld

AWE

Azijli

Teunissen

, et al. (2021) Chest CT in COVID-19 at the ed: validation of the COVID-19 reporting and data system (CO- RADS) and CT severity score: a prospective, multicenter, observational study. Chest 159(3): 1126–1135.

27.

Borghesi

Zigliani

Masciullo

, et al. (2020) Radiographic severity index in COVID-19 pneumonia: relationship to age and sex in 783 Italian patients. La Radiologia medica Med 125(5): 461–464.

28.

Reeves

Pomeranz

Gomella

, et al. (2021) Performance of a severity score on admission chest radiography in predicting clinical outcomes in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19). AJR Am J Roentgenol 217(3): 623–632.

29.

Targoff

(2006) Myositis specific autoantibodies. Curr Rheumatol Rep 8(3): 196–203.

30.

Gunawardena

Betteridge

McHugh

(2008) Newly identified autoantibodies: relationship to idiopathic inflammatory myopathy subsets and pathogenesis. Curr Opin Rheumatol 20(6): 675–680.

31.

Cavazzana

Fredi

Ceribelli

, et al. (2016) Testing for myositis specific autoantibodies: comparison between line blot and immunoprecipitation assays in 57 myositis sera. J Immunol Methods 433: 1–5. DOI: 10.1016/j.jim.2016.02.017.

32.

Rönnelid

Barbasso Helmers

Storfors

, et al. (2009) Use of a commercial line blot assay as a screening test for autoantibodies in inflammatory myopathies. Autoimmun Rev 9(1): 58–61.

33.

Bax

Maddukuri

Ravishankar

, et al. (2021) Environmental triggers of dermatomyositis: a narrative review. Ann Transl Med 9(5): 434.

34.

Houen

Trier

(2020) Epstein-barr virus and systemic autoimmune diseases. Front Immunol 11: 587380.

35.

Chen

Wang

, et al. (2022) New‐onset autoimmune phenomena post‐COVID‐19 vaccination. Immunology 165(4): 386–401.

36.

Betteridge

Tansley

Shaddick

, et al. (2019) Frequency, mutual exclusivity and clinical associations of myositis autoantibodies in a combined European cohort of idiopathic inflammatory myopathy patients. J Autoimmun 101: 48–55.

37.

Gonzalez

Gupta

Murthy

, et al. (2022) Anti-MDA5 dermatomyositis after COVID-19 vaccination: a case-based review. Rheumatol Int 42(9): 1629–1641.

38.

Sugimoto

Yorishima

Oka

, et al. (2023) Appearance of anti-MDA5 antibody-positive dermatomyositis after COVID-19 vaccination. Mod Rheumatol Case Rep 7(1): 108–112.

39.

Chen

Cao

Plana

, et al. (2013) Utility of anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 antibody measurement in identifying patients with dermatomyositis and a high risk for developing rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease: a review of the literature and a meta-analysis. Arthritis Care Res 65(8): 1316–1324.

40.

Bouchard Marmen

Ellezam

Fritzler

, et al. (2022) Anti-synthetase syndrome occurring after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Scand J Rheumatol 51(3): 255–257.

41.

Arya

Anand

Kumar

, et al. (2022) A rare presentation of anti-synthetase syndrome requiring intensive care in the midst of a COVID wave. Mod Rheumatol Case Rep 2022: rxac088.

42.

Vertui

Zanframundo

Castañeda

, et al. (2022) Clinical evolution of antisynthetase syndrome after SARS-CoV2 infection: a 6-month follow-up analysis. Clin Rheumatol 41(8): 2601–2604.

43.

García-Bravo

Calle-Rubio

Fernández-Arquero

, et al. (2022) Association of anti-SARS-COV-2 vaccine with increased incidence of myositis-related anti-RNA-synthetases auto-antibodies. Journal of translational autoimmunity 5: 100160

44.

Ramasamy

Subbian

(2021) Critical determinants of cytokine storm and type I interferon response in COVID-19 pathogenesis. Clin Microbiol Rev 34(3): e00299.

45.

Gasparini

Canepa

Verdiani

, et al. (2021) A retrospective study on the prevalence of anti-phospholipid antibodies, thrombotic events and cutaneous signs of vasculopathy in 173 hospitalized COVID. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol 35: 20587384211042115.

Prevalence of cutaneous manifestations and myositis-specific antibodies in COVID-19 patients and Anti-PL7 antibodies association with pulmonary radiological severity: A retrospective study

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Keywords

Introduction

Methods

Study population

Radiological assessment

Laboratory analysis

Statistical analysis

Results

Discussion

Limitations

Conclusion

Footnotes

Author contributions

Declaration of conflicting interests

Funding

Ethical statement

ORCID iD

References