According to anatomo-morphologic studies, the authors define the role of open surgery in enucleating an adenoma, which is only partially removed with endoscopy, especially if large. Retrospective studies also show a higher probability of a further operation after endoscopy rather than after surgery, with a greater mortality risk due to cardiovascular reasons. In the four-year period from 1987–90, the joint experience of the University Urological Clinics of Padua and Brescia and the Hospital Urological Departments of Bergamo and Treviso, shows that out of 3851 operations, endoscopic treatment was carried out in 84% and surgery in 16%, with a marked prevalence of retropubic adenomectomy (84% of cases). 1989 was taken as a sample year and surgery was performed in 160 out of 935 cases, with excellent results in 87% of the patients. The authors, on the basis of their personal experience, results and literature, confirm that surgical treatment of prostatic hypertrophy is still valid.
HudsonP.B.: Perineal prostatectomy. In Campbell's Urology, 5a edizione cap. 77, pag. 2776–2814.
2.
RavasiniG.: Prostatectomia ipogastrica, prostatectomia perineale e resezione endoscopica nel trattamento dell'ipertrofia prostatica. Estratto dal Giornale di Scienze Mediche, n. 9, Settembre 1946.
AmussatJ.: Lecons sur le rétentions d'urine. Maltese édit., Paris, 1832.
5.
FullerE.: Six successful and successive cases of prostatectomy. J. Cutan. Genitourin. Dis.13, 229–232, 1985.
6.
FreyerP.J.: Enlargement of the prostate. Baillière, Tindall and Cox edit. London, 1906. L'hypertrophie de la prostate (traduzione di M. De Valcourt). Steinheil edit., Paris, 1908.
7.
HarrisS.H.: Suprapubic prostatectomy with closure. Br. J. Urol.1, 285–291, 1929.
8.
MillinT.: Retropubic prostatectomy: new extravesical technique. Repon on 20 cases. Lancet2, 693–696, 1945.
9.
HryntschakT.: Die Erkrankungen der Prostata.Springer, Berlin, 1932.
10.
NicoliG.A.RiffleG., and AndersenF.: The removable purse: a continuing comparable analysis of 300 consecutive cases. J. Urol., 120, 702–704, 1978.
11.
NanningaJ.E., and O'ConorV.J.Jr.: Suprapubic and retropubic prostatectomy. In Campbell's Urology, 5a edizione, Vol. 3, pag. 2739–2753.
12.
PageB.H.: The pathological anatomy of digital enucleation for benign prostatic hyperplasia and its application to endoscopic resection. Br. J. Urol.52, 111–126, 1980.
13.
BlandyJ.P.: The anatomical objectives of operation. In HinmanF.Jr. (ed.): Benign prostatic hypertrophy.New York & Berlin, Springer Verlag, pag. 797–805, 1983.
14.
FlocksR.H., and CulpD.A.: Surgical Urology. IVo dizione. Chicago, Year Book Medical Publishers.
15.
ShahP.J.R.AbramsP.H.FeneleyR.C.L., and GreenN.A.: The influence of prostatic anatomy on the differing results of prostatectomy according to the surgical approach. Br. J. of Urol.51, 549–551, 1979.
16.
RoosN.P.WennbergJ.E.MalenkaD.J.FisherE.S.McPhersonK.TavsFolmer AndersenCohenM.M., and RamseyE.: Mortality and reoperation after open and transurethral resection of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia. The new England Journal of Medicine. April 27, 1120–1124, 1989.
17.
JanknegtR.A.: Surgical management for benign prostatic hyperplasia: indications, techniques, and results. The prostate supplement2, 79–93. Alan R. Liss, Inc., 1989.
18.
MelchiorJ.ValkW.L.ForetJ.D.: Transurethral prostatectomy: computerized analysis of 2,223 consecutive cases. J. Urol., 112, 634–642, 1974.
FowlerF.J.WennbergJ.E.TimothyR.P.: Symptom status and quality of life following prostatectomy. J.A.M.A., 259, 3018–3022, 1989.
21.
WennbergJ.E.MulleyA.G.HanleyD. e Coll.: An assessment for prostatectomy for benign urinary tract obstruction. J.A.M.A., 259, 3027–3030, 1988.
22.
MeyhoffH. H.: Transurethral versus transvesical prostatectomy. Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol. (Suppl.), 102, 3–25, 1987.
23.
MadsenP.O., and IversenP.: A point system for selecting operative candidates in HinmanF.Jr. (ed.): Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy.New York & Berlin, Springer Verlag, pag. 763–765, 1983.
24.
McDonaldD.F., and HugginsC.: Simultaneous prostatectomy and inguinal herniorrhaphy. Surg. Gynec. e Obst., 89, 621–625, 1949.
25.
MalufN.S., and TauberA.S.: Combined prostatectomy and herniorrhaphy through the Pfannenstiel incision. Urol. Int., 11, 51–54, 1961.
26.
WeinbergS.R.KovetzA., and LazarusS.M.: Technique of herniorrhaphy. In: Simultaneous Prostatectomy and inguinal herniorrhaphy.Springfield, Charles C. Thomas Publishers, chapt. V, pag. 41–44, 1971.
27.
RavasiniG.Cosciani CunicoS.: Indicazioni e risultati all'erniectomia per via preperitoneale in corso di prostatectomia. Archivio ed atti della Società Giuliana di Chirurgia. Vol. II, LXXII Congresso. Roma, Ottobre 1970.
28.
SchlegelP.N., and WalshP.C.: Simultaneous preperitoneal hernia repair during radical pelvic surgery. J. Urol., 137, 1180–1183, 1987.
29.
AbarbanelJ. e KimcheD.: Combined retropubic prostatectomy and preperitoneal inguinal herniorrhaphy. J. Urol.140, 1442–1444, 1988.
30.
O'ConnorV.J.BulkleyG.J., and SokolJ.K.: Low suprapubic prostatectomy: comparison of results with the standard operation in two comparable groups of 142 patients. J. Urol., 90, 301–304, 1963.
31.
ChiltonC.P.MorganR.J.EnglandH.R.ParisA.M.I. e BlandyJ.P.: A critical evaluation of the results of transurethral resection of the prostate. Br. J. Urol.50, 542–546, 1978.
32.
NealD.E.RamsdenP.D.SharpiesL. e coll.: Outcome of elective prostatectomy. Br. Med. J., 299, 762–767, 1989.
33.
NealD.E.: Prostatectomy an open or closed case. Br. J. Urol.66, 449–454, 1990.
