AsperR., SchmuckiO.: Socio-economic aspects of urinary stone disease in Eurasia in the 19th and 20th century. In: Urinary Stone.RyallR. L., BrockisJ. G., MarshallV. R., FinlaysonB. (eds.), p. 4–18. Churchill, Livingstone1984.
3.
ChaussyC., SchmiedtE.: Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for kidney stones. An alternative to surgery. Urol. Radiol., 6; 80 (1984).
4.
LingemanJ. E., SaywellR. M.Jr., WoodsJ. R., NewmannD. M.: Cost analysis of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy relative to other surgical and nonsurgical treatment alternative for urolithiasis. Med. Care, 24; 1151 (1986).
5.
MondainiF., MarzoccoM., BarbagliG., RubinoF.: La calcolosi renoureterale nell'area pratese. Acta Urologica Italica, in corso di stampa.
6.
PayneS. R., WebbD. R., WickhamJ. E. A.: A strategy for management of upper tract calculus disease. Brit. J. Urol., 57; 610 (1985).
7.
RousS. N.: Evaluation of the urolithiasis patient. In: Stone disease. Diagnosis and management.RousS. N. (ed.), p. 2–11. Grune & Stratton, 1987.
8.
ScottR.: Epidemiology of stone disease. Brit. J. Urol., 57; 491 (1985).
