Mini-PCNL (percutaneous nephrolithotomy) versus FURSL (flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy): A head-to-head comparison in treating calyceal diverticulum stones: A prospective randomized study

Abstract

Purpose:

To compare the efficacy and safety of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy in the management of calyceal diverticulum stones.

Methods:

The study performed a prospective analysis of 91 patients with confirmed calyceal diverticulum stones in Saudi Arabia from January 2020 to June 2024. A total of 78 patients with CD (calyceal diverticulum) stones were randomly divided into two groups: Group A (n = 39) FURSL and Group B (n = 39) mini-PCNL. The study analyzed patient demographics, stone complexity, operative parameters, postoperative results, and postoperative outcomes, including stone-free rates, operative time, hospital stay, complication rates, and recovery time.

Results:

Both groups showed similar baseline characteristics and surgical feasibility, with the mini-PCNL group showing a higher SFR (84.62% vs 71.79%), but not statistically significant. Hospital stay was significantly shorter in the FURSL group (17.31 ± 3.06 h vs 30.03 ± 7.18 h; p < 0.001). Patients undergoing FURSL returned to normal activity sooner (5.1 ± 1.37 days vs 8.03 ± 1.05 days; p < 0.05). Complication rates were low and nearly similar across groups.

Conclusions:

Both mini-PCNL and FURSL are effective strategies for treating calyceal diverticulum stones. Notably, mini-PCNL offers superior stone-free rates, while FURSL offers shorter operative times, hospital stays, and fast recovery.

Keywords

Calyceal diverticulum mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy kidney stones stone-free rate

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Waingankar

Hayek

Smith

, et al. Calyceal diverticula: a comprehensive review. Rev Urol 2014; 16(1): 29–43.

Timmons

Malek

Hattery

, et al. Caliceal diverticulum. J Urol 1975; 114(1): 6–9.

Shao

, et al. Percutaneous nephroscopy versus flexible ureteroscopy in the treatment of calyceal diverticulum calculi: a meta-analysis. BMC Urol 2025; 25(1): 1.

Kurkov

Pominalnaya

Nechay

, et al. A case report of calyceal diverticulum: Differential diagnosis for organ-preserving operations. Front Surg 2021; 8: 731796.

Nourian

SMA

Bahrami

. Open surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for management of staghorn calculi. Am J Clin Exp Urol 2022; 10(4): 271–276.

Dong

Cai

, et al. Recent advances in the treatment of renal stones using flexible ureteroscopys. Int J Surg 2024; 110(7): 4320–4328.

Abdelrasol

Assem

. Flexible ureteroscopy with and without ureteral access sheath in treatment of large renal stones: a randomized controlled study. Afr J Urol 2024; 30(1): 62.

Thapa

Niranjan

. Mini PCNL over standard PCNL: what makes it better? Surg J 2020; 6(1): e19–e23.

Fiorello

. Treatment of 2-4 cm kidney stones: multicentre experience. Comparison of safety, efficacy, and costs of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery. Cent Eur J Urol 2023; 76(2): 135–140.

10.

Collura

D'Ippolito

Lopes Mandes

, et al. Vacuum-assisted mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for 2–3-cm renal stones: a comparative study with retrograde intra-renal surgery. J Pediatr Surg 2024; 59(3): 412–415.

11.

Zeng

Traxer

Zhong

, et al. International Alliance of Urolithiasis guideline on retrograde intrarenal surgery. BJU Int 2023; 131(2): 153–164.

12.

Ergin

Köprü

Kıraç

. The comparison of flexible ureterorenoscopy and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of 10-25 mm kidney stones in elderly patients. J Urol Surg 2021; 8(1): 23–28.

13.

Zhang

, et al. Comparison of flexible ureteroscopy and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment for multiple nephrolithiasis. Front Surg 2022; 9: 1004432.

14.

Zhang

Chen

, et al. Comparison of efficacy and safety of flexible ureteroscopy and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for 2-3 cm renal calculi in women: a single-center study. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2023; 27(22): 11115–11121.

15.

Bizzarri

Campetella

Russo

, et al. Risk factors for benign uretero-enteric anastomotic strictures after open radical cystectomy and ileal conduit. Urologia 2024; 92: 224–230.

16.

Zewu

Cui

Feng

, et al. Comparison of retrograde flexible ureteroscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy in treating intermediatesize renal stones (2-3cm): a meta-analysis and systematic review. Int Braz J Urol 2019; 45(1): 10–22.

17.

Srivastava

Chipde

Mandhani

, et al. Percutaneous management of renal caliceal diverticular stones: ten-year experience of a tertiary care center with different techniques to deal with diverticula after stone extraction. Indian J Urol 2013; 29(4): 273–276.

18.

Chen

Zeng

, et al. Comparative study of the treatment of 20-30 mm renal stones with miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureterorenoscopy in obese patients. World J Urol 2018; 36(8): 1309–1314.

19.

Jinhua

Wanlin

. Retrospective analysis of stone basket combined with flexible ureteroscope holmium laser lithotripsy in the treatment of lower calyceal stones. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2022; 26(10): 3430–3436.

20.

Boeri

Turetti

Silvani

, et al. The comprehensive complication index as a tool for reporting the burden of complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: is it time to leave the Clavien-Dindo classification behind? Eur Urol 2022; 81: S1507–S1508.

21.

Ferakis

Stavropoulos

. Mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of renal and upper ureteral stones: Lessons learned from a review of the literature. Urol Ann 2015; 7(2): 141–148.

22.

Shen

. The safety and efficacy of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy vs. retrograde intrarenal surgery for treatment of renal lithiasis in pelvic ectopic kidney: an exploratory pilot study. Transl Androl Urol 2021; 10(4): 1734–1742.

23.

Burr

Ishii

Simmonds

, et al. Is flexible ureterorenoscopy and laser lithotripsy the new gold standard for lower pole renal stones when compared to shock wave lithotripsy: comparative outcomes from a University hospital over similar time period. Cent Eur J Urol 2015; 68(2): 183–186.

24.

Drake

Ali

Somani

. Feasibility and safety of bilateral same-session flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) for renal and ureteral stone disease. Cent Eur J Urol 2015; 68(2): 193–196.

25.

Alenezi

Denstedt

. Flexible ureteroscopy: technological advancements, current indications and outcomes in the treatment of urolithiasis. Asian J Urol 2015; 2(3): 133–141.

26.

Rodrigues

JECM

Vicentini

Danilovic

, et al. Comparison of the outcomes of flexible ureteroscopy and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of kidney stones: a matched-pair analysis. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) 2022; 68: 1481–1485.

27.

Zeng

Zhu

Lam

. Miniaturised percutaneous nephrolithotomy: its role in the treatment of urolithiasis and our experience. Asian J Urol 2018; 5(4): 295–302.

28.

Alkan

Sarıbacak

Ozkanli

, et al. Flexible ureteroscopy can be more efficacious in the treatment of proximal ureteral stones in select patients. Adv Urol 2015; 2015: 416031.

29.

Shu

Zhang

, et al. Flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy based on the concept of enhanced recovery after surgery: a single-centered retrospective study. Urol J 2022; 19(4): 268–273.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

10.81 MB

22.72 MB