Renal stones in anomalous kidneys pose surgical challenges due to altered anatomy. Miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL) reduces morbidity, but concerns remain about stone-free rates (SFRs) and infection. Suction-assisted mini-PCNL (SM-PCNL) enhances fragment removal and controls intrarenal pressure, but its role in anomalous kidneys is unclear.
Objective:
To evaluate perioperative outcomes of SM-PCNL in anomalous kidneys in a multicenter, real-world study and assess variations based on positioning, lithotripsy modality, and renal anomalies.
Methodology:
This prospective study across 15 centers (January–December 2024) included 287 adults undergoing SM-PCNL for renal stones in anomalous kidneys. Patients with normal anatomy, non-suction PCNL, or incomplete data were excluded. SFR was assessed via a 30-day non-contrast CT: 100% stone-free (Grade A), residual fragments ≤4 mm (Grade B), or >4 mm/multiple (Grade C, requiring reintervention).
Results:
Malrotation (65.5%) was the most common anomaly, followed by duplex systems (25.1%), horseshoe kidneys (8.4%), and ectopic kidneys (1.0%). Median stone size was 1.7 cm. Supine positioning was used in 54.4%. Lithotripsy was performed with holmium laser (50.9%), thulium fiber laser (11.1%), or pneumatic lithotripsy (26.1%). Intraoperative clearance was 95.4%. At 30 days, 93.4% achieved Grade A, 5.6% Grade B, and 1.0% required reintervention. Complications were low; 0.7% had sepsis requiring intensive care unit admission. No transfusions or pleural injuries occurred.
Conclusion:
SM-PCNL using 18F suction sheaths with laser in a single stage achieved 93.4% complete SFR with negligible complications and minimal reintervention.
EAU Guidelines. Presented at the EAU Annual Congress Paris 2024. EAU; n.d. ISBN 978-94-92671-23-3.
2.
JackmanSV, DocimoSG, CadedduJA, BishoffJT, KavoussiLR, JarrettTW. The “mini-perc” technique: A less invasive alternative to percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World J Urol, 1998; 16(6):371–374; doi: 10.1007/s003450050083
3.
WuJ, ShenJ. The safety and efficacy of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy vs. retrograde intrarenal surgery for treatment of renal lithiasis in pelvic ectopic kidney: An exploratory pilot study. Transl Androl Urol, 2021; 10(4):1734–1742; doi: 10.21037/tau-21-77
4.
HinmanF, RedewillFH. Pyelovenous back flow. JAMA, 1926; 87(16):1287–1293; doi: 10.1001/jama.1926.02680160035011
5.
NizzardoM, AlboG, RipaF, et al.Assessment of effectiveness and safety of aspiration-assisted nephrostomic access sheaths in PCNL and intrarenal pressures evaluation: A systematic review of the literature. J Clin Med, 2024; 13(9):2558; doi: 10.3390/jcm13092558
6.
KhadgiS, ShresthaB, IbrahimH, ShresthaS, ElSheemyMS, Al-KandariAM. Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for stones in anomalous-kidneys: A prospective study. Urolithiasis, 2017; 45(4):407–414; doi: 10.1007/s00240-016-0926-1
7.
García RojoE, TeohJY, CastellaniD, et al.Real-world global outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery in anomalous kidneys: A high volume international multicenter study. Urology, 2022; 159:41–47; doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.10.003
8.
LimEJ, TeohJY-C, FongKY, et al.Propensity score-matched analysis comparing retrograde intrarenal surgery with percutaneous nephrolithotomy in anomalous kidneys. Eur Urol, 2022; 81:S1487–S1488; doi: 10.1016/S0302-2838(22)01090-9
9.
ValdiviaJG, ScarpaRM, DuvdevaniM, et al.; Croes PCNL Study Group. Supine versus prone position during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A report from the clinical research office of the endourological society percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study. J Endourol, 2011; 25(10):1619–1625; doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0110
10.
GauharV, CastellaniD, KalathiaJet al.Prospective multicenter real-world outcomes of Suction Technology Utility in Mini-PCNL Study (STUMPS) in modern-day practice: formulation of the global STUMPS registry on behalf of the endourology section of the European Association of Urology and the suction mini-PCNL collaborative study group. World J Urol, 2025; 43(1):298; doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05656-8
11.
de la RosetteJJ, OpondoD, DaelsFP, et al.Categorisation of complications and validation of the Clavien score for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol, 2012; 62(2):246–255; doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.03.055
12.
MaharNA, MughalN, MaharR, ChannaMA, HussainM. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in anomalous kidney. J Pak Med Assoc, 2025; 75(07):1135–1137; doi: 10.47391/JPMA.20719
13.
ZenginK, et al.Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of moderate-sized renal stones: A prospective randomized study. J Endourol, 2011; 25(11):1649–1654.
14.
HoznekA, et al.Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for stones in horseshoe kidneys. Urology, 1999; 54(6):974–978.
HopperKD, KingDA, LandmanJ, RamirezG. CT angiography before percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A technique to define vascular anatomy. Am J Roentgenol, 2004; 182(3):711–717.
17.
SampaioFJ, AragaoAH. Anatomical relationship between the intrarenal arteries and the kidney collecting system. J Urol, 1990; 143(4):679–681; doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)40056-5
18.
SullivanGM, ArtinoAR. Analyzing and interpreting data from Likert-type scales. J Grad Med Educ, 2013; 5(4):541–542; doi: 10.4300/JGME-5-4-18
19.
QinP, ZhangD, HuangT, FangL, ChengY. Comparison of mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones >2cm: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Braz J Urol, 2022; 48(4):637–648; doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2021.0347
20.
FredericP, EduardaA, VineetG. Stone volume instead of maximum stone diameter: Results from an international survey. BJU Int, 2025; 136(1):95–102; doi: doi:10.1111/bju.16693
21.
WaniM, MohamedAHA, BrownG, SriprasadS, MadaanS. Challenges and options for management of stones in anomalous kidneys: A review of current literature. Ther Adv Urol, 2023; 15:17562872231217797; doi: 10.1177/17562872231217797
22.
OstherPJ, HassanR, EvangelosL, et al.; Croes PCNL Study Group. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy among patients with renal anomalies: Patient characteristics and outcomes; a subgroup analysis of the clinical research office of the endourological society global percutaneous nephrolithotomy study. J Endourol, 2011; 25(10):1627–1632; doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0146
23.
PozziE, MalfattoM, TurettiM, et al.Validation of the trifecta scoring metric in vacuum-assisted mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A single-center experience. J Clin Med, 2022; 11(22):6788; doi: 10.3390/jcm11226788
24.
El-NahasAR, KhadgiS, DiabM, Al-TerkiA. Definition and unfavorable risk factors of trifecta in mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol, 2021; 35(8):1140–1145; doi: 10.1089/end.2020.1192
25.
KankariaS, GaliKV, ChawlaA, et al.Super-mini PCNL (SMP) with suction versus standard PCNL for the management of renal calculi of 1.5 cm–3 cm: A randomized controlled study from a university teaching hospital. World J Urol, 2024; 42(1):257; doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-04954-x
26.
PrakashG, SinhaRJ, JhanwarA, BansalA, SinghV. Outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in anomalous kidney: Is it different? Urol Ann, 2017; 9(1):23–26; doi: 10.4103/0974-7796.198836
27.
De StefanoV, CastellaniD, SomaniBK, et al.Suction in percutaneous nephrolithotripsy: Evolution, development, and outcomes from experimental and clinical studies. results from a systematic review. Eur Urol Focus, 2024; 10(1):154–168; doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.06.010
28.
KolanukuduruKP, ZaytounO, TilluN, MandelA, DoveyZ, BuscariniM. Safety and efficacy of vacuum-assisted mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of renal stone disease: An analysis of stone free status and postoperative infectious complications. Int Braz J Urol, 2024; 50(6):737–745; doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2024.0308
29.
ZengG-H, ZhongW, MazzonG, et al.International Alliance of Urolithiasis (IAU) consensus on miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Mil Med Res, 2024; 11(1):70; doi: 10.1186/s40779-024-00562-3
30.
GauharV, TraxerO, CastellaniD, et al.Operative outcomes 24 hours after retrograde intrarenal surgery for solitary renal calculi using a flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath. A prospective global multicenter study by the European Association of Urology Section on Urolithiasis. Minerva Urol Nephrol, 2024; 76(5):625–634.
31.
DelgadoDA, LambertBS, BoutrisN, et al.Validation of digital visual analog scale pain scoring with a traditional paper-based visual analog scale in adults. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev, 2018; 2(3):e088.
32.
SinghA, PalaniappanS, JaiS, TakG, GanpuleA, SabnisR, DesaiM. The clinical outcomes of laser with suction device in mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Asian J Urol, 2022; 9(1):63–68.
