It keeps on turning: Effects of prolonged long-term left ventricular assist device support as a bridge to heart transplantation

Abstract

Objectives:

Increasing incidence of end-stage heart failure has moved the therapy with left ventricular assist devices to the forefront of surgical treatment. Moreover, continuous sophistication in this technology has resulted in increasing proportion of patients on prolonged support. Early and late complications after left ventricular assist device as a bridge to transplantation and present factors associated with long-term support and long-term outcomes of patients supported for at least 1 year were compared.

Methods:

A total of 163 consecutive patients who underwent left ventricular assist device implantation as bridge to transplantation were included. A total of 79 patients were supported for at least 1 year (long-term support), whereas 84 patients were supported for less than 1 year (short-term group).

Results:

Factors associated with a successful long-term support were male gender (p < 0.001), cessation of smoking at least 6 months prior to surgery (p = 0.045), previous implantation of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (p = 0.001) and rapid postoperative extubation (p = 0.018). Regarding echocardiographic parameters, higher left ventricular mass (p = 0.013) and larger left ventricular–end systolic (p = 0.008) and diastolic (p = 0.005) diameters prior to left ventricular assist device implantation were associated with long-term support. Short-term group showed higher mortality and higher proportion of patients who underwent device exchange due to device failure, and left ventricular assist device explantation for myocardial recovery was less frequent in the long-term support (p < 0.001). In addition, patients from the long-term support had significantly higher incidence of higher-grade aortic regurgitation (p = 0.005).

Conclusion:

Prolonged left ventricular assist device support as bridge to transplantation is associated with lower mortality and lower incidence of device failure requiring device exchange. However, long-term support reduces the chance of device explantation for myocardial recovery and increases the incidence of higher-grade aortic regurgitation in the follow-up.

Keywords

Cardiac assist and artificial heart blood pump centrifugal cardiac surgery circulatory support congestive heart failure ventricular assist devices

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Kirklin

Pagani

Kormos

et al . Eighth annual INTERMACS report: special focus on framing the impact of adverse events. J Heart Lung Transplant 2017; 36(10): 1080–1086.

Kurihara

Kawabori

Sugiura

et al . Bridging to a long-term ventricular assist device with short-term mechanical circulatory support. Artif Organs 2018; 42: 589–596.

Popov

Hosseini

Zych

et al . Clinical experience with HeartWare left ventricular assist device in patients with end-stage heart failure. Ann Thorac Surg 2012; 93(3): 810–815.

Sabashnikov

Mohite

Zych

et al . Outcomes and predictors of early mortality after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation as a bridge to transplantation. ASAIO J 2014; 60(2): 162–169.

Sandica

Blanz

Mime

et al . Long-term mechanical circulatory support in pediatric patients. Artif Organs 2016; 40(3): 225–232.

Weymann

Patil

Sabashnikov

et al . Continuous-flow left ventricular assist device therapy in patients with preoperative hepatic failure: are we pushing the limits too far. Artif Organs 2015; 39(4): 336–342.

MacGowan

Schueler

Right heart failure after left ventricular assist device implantation: early and late. Curr Opin Cardiol 2012; 27(3): 296–300.

Matthews

Koelling

Pagani

et al . The right ventricular failure risk score a pre-operative tool for assessing the risk of right ventricular failure in left ventricular assist device candidates. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 51(22): 2163–2172.

Sabashnikov

Mohite

Weymann

et al . Outcomes after implantation of 139 full-support continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices as a bridge to transplantation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2014; 46(5): e59–e66.

10.

Gammie

Edwards

Griffith

et al . Optimal timing of cardiac transplantation after ventricular assist device implantation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004; 127(6): 1789–1799.

11.

John

Pagani

Naka

et al . Post-cardiac transplant survival after support with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device: impact of duration of left ventricular assist device support and other variables. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010; 140(1): 174–181.

12.

Robertson

Lober

Smedira

et al . One hundred days or more bridged on a ventricular assist device and effects on outcomes following heart transplantation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2008; 34(2): 295–300.

13.

Takeda

Takayama

Kalesan

et al . Outcome of cardiac transplantation in patients requiring prolonged continuous-flow left ventricular assist device support. J Heart Lung Transplant 2015; 34(1): 89–99.

14.

Mehra

Goldstein

Uriel

et al . Two-Year Outcomes with a Magnetically Levitated Cardiac Pump in Heart Failure. N Engl J Med 2018; 378(15): 1386–1395.

15.

Fukuhara

Takeda

Polanco

et al . Prolonged continuous-flow left ventricular assist device support and posttransplantation outcomes: a new challenge. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016; 151(3): 872–880.e5.

16.

Grimm

Magruder

Crawford

et al . Duration of left ventricular assist device support does not impact survival after US heart transplantation. Ann Thorac Surg 2016; 102(4): 1206–1212.

17.

Parameshwar

Hogg

Rushton

et al . Patient survival and therapeutic outcome in the UK bridge to transplant left ventricular assist device population. Heart. Epub ahead of print 18 August 2018. DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2018-313355.

18.

Seco

Zhao

Byrom

et al . Long-term prognosis and cost-effectiveness of left ventricular assist device as bridge to transplantation: a systematic review. Int J Cardiol 2017; 235: 22–32.

19.

Sayer

Sarswat

Kim

et al . The hemodynamic effects of aortic insufficiency in patients supported with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices. J Card Fail 2017; 23(7): 545–551.