Abstract
Purpose
This prospective, randomized study compared the clinical performance of three types of circuits: a newly introduced, fully-coated, interchangeable open-closed circuit with a dual configuration (hard shell with a bypass shunt), reduced length, and reduced prime of less than 800 cc (CondECC); a completely coated circuit (ECC); and a similar uncoated, open circuit with standard length and prime (CONT).
Methods
75 patients undergoing reoperation for coronary revascularization were randomly allocated into three groups (N=25): Group 1: CondECC with shortened tubing, components and an open-closed configuration of low priming volume with a centrifugal pump and a shunt which bypassed the reservoir for closed configuration; Group 2: ECC with a roller pump and hard-shell reservoir; Group 3: CONT. Blood samples for CBC, inflammatory mediators [Interleukin-2 (IL-2), Complement-3a (C3a)] and flow cytometry (CD11 b/CD18) were collected after induction (T1) and heparin administration (T2), 15 min after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) (T3), before cessation of CPB (T4), 15 min after reversal (T5), and the first postoperative day (T6).
Results
Leukocyte counts demonstrated significant increases at T4, T5 in CONT but remained stable in ECC and CondECC (p<0.05). Platelets were preserved better at T4, T5 in both ECC and CondECC study groups (p<0.05). IL-2 and C3a levels were significantly lower at T3, T4, T5 in CondECC and T4, T5 in ECC (p<0.05). Blood protein adsorption analysis demonstrated increased amount of microalbumin on CONT fibers (p<0.05).
Conclusions
The CondECC is a flexible, dual-function, open/closed configuration system that was easy to use, safe and achieved better biocompatibility when compared to coated and uncoated conventional circuits.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.