A voice-producing element has been developed to improve speech quality after laryngectomy. The design process started with the formulation of a list of requirements. The lip principle has the best potential for fulfilling the requirements. A numerical model was made to find the optimal geometry of an element based on the lip principle. Extensive in vitro tests were performed to check all requirements. For this a test set-up with realistic acoustic and aerodynamic properties was developed. Results show that the protruding lip length dominates fundamental frequency, cross-sectional area dominates flow resistance and relation between flow and fundamental frequency. Most requirements have been fullfilled; both for males and females a potentially good functioning prototype could be selected.
Clinical experiments will be performed to confirm the quality of the voice-producing prosthesis.
SingerM.I., BlomE.D.. An endoscopic technique for restoration of voice after laryngectomy. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology (St.Louis)1980; 89: 529–33.
2.
NijdamH.F., AnnyasA.A., SchutteH.K., LeeverH.F.. A new prosthesis for voice rehabilitation after Laryngectomy.Archiv für Otorhinolaryngologie1982; 237: 27–33.
3.
HilgersF.J., SchouwenburgP.F.. A new low-resistance, self-retaining prosthesis (Provox) for voice rehabilitation after total laryngectomy.The Laryngoscope1990; 100: 1202–7.
4.
BloodG.W.. Fundamental frequency and intensity measurements in laryngeal and alaryngeal speakers.J Commun Disord1984; 17: 319–24.
5.
QiY., WeinbergB.. Characteristics of voicing source waveforms produced by esophageal and tracheosophageal speakers.J Speech Hear Res1995; 38: 536–48.
6.
QiY., WeinbergB., BiN.. Enhancement of female esophageal and tracheosophageal speech.J Acoust Soc Am1995; 98: 2461–5.
7.
RobbinsJ., FisherH.B., BlomE.C., SingerM.I.. A comparative acoustic study of normal, esophageal, and tracheosophageal speech production.J Speech Hear Disord1984; 49: 202–10.
8.
HermannI.F., Arca RecioS., AlgabaJ.. A new concept of surgical voice restoration after total laryngectomy: The female voice. In: HermannI.F., ed. The second international symposium on laryngeal and tracheal reconstruction, MonteCarlo, 1996; 263–6.
9.
HagenR., BerningK., KornM., SchönF.. Stimmprothesen mit tonerzeugendem Metallzungen-Element - experimentelle und erste klinische Ergebnisse. (Voice prostheses with sound-producing metal reed element - an experimental study and initial clinical results).Laryngorhinootologie1998; 77: 312–21.
10.
TomM., v.d., FestenJ.M., VriesMPd, Verdonck-de LeeuwI.M., MahieuH.F.. Alternative voice after laryngectomy using a sound-producing voice prosthesis.The Laryngoscope. Submitted. 2000.
11.
Wong ChungR.P., GeskusJ., MahieuH.F.. The ultra-low resistance Groningen voice prosthesis: aerodynamic properties.Revue Laryngologie Otologie Rhinologie1999; 120: 245–8.
12.
ZijlstraR.J., MahieuH.F., Lith-BijlJ.T.v, SchutteH.K.. Aerodynamic properties of the low-resistance Groningen Button.Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (Chicago)1991; 117: 657–61.
13.
SchutteH.K.. The efficiency of voice production. Thesis University of Groningen. 1980.
14.
HartJt', CollierR., CohenA.. A perceptual study of intonation: an experimental-phonetic approach to speech melody.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, XV, 212. 1990.
BergJ. v.d. Vocal ligaments versus registers.Current Problems in Phoniatrics and Logopedics1960; 19–34.
17.
LiebermanP.. A study of prosodic features. In: Current trends in linguistic.Mouton & Co,1972; 2419–49.
18.
FlanaganJ.L.. Some properties of the glottal sound source.The Bell System Technical Journal1958; 1–18.
19.
FlanaganJ.L.. Some influences of the glottal wave upon vowel quality. In: Proceedings of the fourth international congress of phonetic sciences Helsinki 1961, SovijärviA., AaltoP., eds. The Hague: Mouton & Co., Janua Lingyarum, Series Maior 1962; 35–49.
20.
RosenbergA.E.. Effect of glottal pulse shape on the quality of natural vowels.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America1970; 49: 583–90.
21.
FletcherN.H.. Excitation mechanisms in woodwind and brass instruments.Acustica1979; 43: 65–72.
22.
FletcherN.H., RossingT.D.. The physics of musical instruments.New York: Springer-Verlag, 1998.
23.
ŠramF.. Laute und Silben der Hilfsartikulation beim Blasen von Blechblasinstrumenten. In: WidholmG., NagyM., eds. Das Instrumentalspiel: Beiträge zur Akustik der Musikinstrumente, Medizinische und Physiologische aspekte des musizierens. Bericht vom Internationalen Symposion Wie, Wien/München: Doblinger Verlag1989; 137–46 (1988).
24.
VriesMPd, HamburgM.C., VeldmanA.E.P., SchutteH.K., VerkerkeG.J.. Numerical simulation of a voice-producing prosthesis based on Navier Stokes equations and the finite element method.J Acoust Soc of Am, 2000.
25.
TitzeI.R.. Phonation threshold pressure. A missing link in glottal aerodynamics.J Acoust Soc Am1992; 91: 2926–35.
26.
PlaatsA Vd., VriesMPd, EerdenF.J.M., SchutteH.K., VerkerkeG.J.. In vitro measurements of a voice-producing element under physiologic acoustic conditions.J Acoust Soc Am Submitted. 2000.
27.
NieboerG.L.J., SchutteH.K.. Aerodynamic properties of buttons and of button-assisted speech.Clin Otolaryngol (Oxford)1983; 8: 285–6.
28.
NieboerG.L.J., SchutteH.K.. Aerodynamical properties of buttons and of button-assisted esophageal speech. In: HermanI.F., ed. Speech restoration via voice prostheses, Berlin: Springer-Verlag1986; 87–91.
29.
NieboerG.L.J., SchutteH.K.. The Groningen Button: Results of in vivo measurements.Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bordeaux)1987; 108: 121–2.
30.
MahieuH.F., SchutteH.K., SaeneHKF v, RosinghH.J.. Candida vegetations on silicone voice prostheses.Arch of Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (Chicago)1986; 112: 321–5.
31.
EveraertEPJM, MaheuH.F., Belt-GritterBvd. Biofilm formation in vivo on perfluoro-alkylsiloxane-modified voice prostheses.Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (Chicago)1999; 125: 12329–32.
32.
MahieuH.F., SaeneJJMv, BestenJd, SaeneHKFv. Oropharynx decontamination preventing candida vegetation on voice protheses.Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (Chicago)1986; 112: 1090–2.
