One of the predominant features of pre-capitalist relations in the nineteenth century India was that the existence of servitude came to be regulated by the Workmen’s Breach of Contract Act, 1859. The courts in colonial India interpreted the debt-bondage constituted through money wages in terms of master–servant. Its ramifications were extended beyond agriculture and into small workshops where contracts of service re- placing the pre-capitalist relations of bondage emerged. Though the movement of the ‘workmen’ and the pannials who approached the courts for relief from status to contract was notionally permitted by the courts, the real conditions of the vast majority of the pannials remained unchanged due to the nature of the colonial economy.
A Note on Pariahs of Chingleput by Trementere, Madras, 1891.
2.
All India Reporter (hereafter AIR), Madras, various issues.
3.
Bombay, Labour Report (hereafter LR), various issues.
4.
Francis, W. Gazetteer of South Arcot, Madras, 1906.
5.
G.O. 22O, l. 25 January 1930, Public Works and Labour, Tamilnadu State Archives (hereafter TSA).
6.
Indian Law Report (hereafter ILR), Allahabad, 1889, various issues.
7.
ILR, Madras, Vol. XLIII.
8.
Indian Report, Allahabad, 1881.
9.
Indian Report, Bombay, 1883.
10.
Jummabandhi Report of Tanjore, Madras, 1832.
11.
LJ, Allahabad, 1914.
12.
LJ, Madras, 1913.
13.
LR, Allahabad, 1914.
14.
Madras High Court Proceedings (hereafter MHCP).
15.
Madras High Court Report, 1865.
16.
Madras Law Journal (hereafter MLJ), various issues.
17.
Madras Law Weekly, 12 February 1885.
18.
PBR, 5-8-1816, Vol. 727–9186.
19.
Report of the Commissioners for the Investigation of Alleged Cases of Torture in the Madras Presidency, Madras , 1855.
20.
South Arcot Records, 7-9-1803, Vol. 3644: 165.
21.
Trichinopoly Records, 22.08.1812, Vol. 8670: I.
22.
Arnold, David ‘ Dacoity and Rural Crime in Madras, 1860–1940 ’, Journal of Peasant Studies, Vol. VI, 1978–79, p. 148 .
23.
Bandopadhyay, Arun . The Agrarian Economy of Tamilnadu, 1820–1855, Calcutta , 1992.
24.
Bhattacharya, Neeladari . ‘Colonial State and Agrarian Society’, in Sabyasachi Bhattacharya and Romila Thapar , eds, Situating Indian History for Sarvapalli Gopal, Delhi , 1986, p. 142.
25.
Bhattacharya, Neeladari . ‘Agricultural Labour and Production: Central and South East Punjab, 1870–1940’, in Gyan Prakash , ed., The World of the Rural Labourer in Colonial India, 1992, p. 191.
26.
Chandavarkar, Rajnarayan . The Origins of Industrial Capitalism in India: Business Strategies and Working Classes in Bombay, 1900–1940, Cambridge , 1994.
27.
Chopra, P.N. , T.K. Ravindran and N.Subramanian . History of South India, Vol. III, Delhi , 1979.
28.
Cocks, R.C.J.Sir Henry Maine: A Study in Victorian Jurisprudence, Cambridge , 1987.
29.
Cohen, B.S. ‘ From Status to Contract ’, Journal of Economic History, Vol. XXI, December 1961, p. 53 .
30.
Das Gupta, Ranajit . ‘ Factory Labour in Eastern India: Sources of Supply, 1855–1946: Some Preliminary Findings ’, Indian Economic and Social History Review (IESHR), Vol. III (3), September 1976, pp. 278–36 .
31.
Gough, Kathleen . Rural Society in South East India, Cambridge , 1981.
32.
Guha, Amelendu . Planter Raj to Swaraj: Freedom Struggle and Electoral Politics in Assam 1826–1947, Delhi , 1977.
33.
Gulimoto, Christopher Z. ‘ The Tamil Migration Cycle, 1830–1950 ’, Economic and Political Weekly, 16–23 January 1993, p. 113 .
34.
Hjejle, Benedicte . ‘ Slavery and Agricultural Bondage in South India in the Nineteenth Century ,’ Scandinavian Economic History Reviews, Vol. XV (1 and 2), 1967, p. 97 .
35.
Hutt, W.H. ‘The Factory System of Early Nineteenth Century’, in F.A. Hayak , ed., Capitalism and the Historians, London , 1954, p. 171.
36.
Joshi, Chitra . ‘ Kanpur Textile Labour Some Structural Features of Formative Years ’, EPW, Vol. 16 (44–46), 1981, pp. 1823–38 .
37.
Kalimuthu, A.K.Colonial Economy and the Lower Peasantry Tamil Nadu Scenario, 1801–1947, Trichy , 2004.
38.
Kumar, Dharma . ‘Caste and Landless men in South India’, in Gyan Prakash , ed., The World of the Rural Labourer in Colonial India, Delhi , 1992, p. 88.
39.
Kumar, Dharma . ‘South India’, in Dharma Kumar and Meghnad Desai , eds, Cambridge Economic History of India, Vol. 2: c. 1757–c. 1970, Delhi , 1984, p. 356.
40.
Kumar, Dharma . Land and Caste in South India–Agricultural Labour in Madras Presidency, New Delhi , reprint 1992.
41.
Lakshmanan, M. ‘ Collective Bargaining under the Common Law Tradition in Madras in the Inter War Period 1918–1939 ’, IESHR, Vol. XXXV (3), 1998, pp. 247–73 .
42.
Ludden, David . Peasant History in South India, Princeton , 1985.
43.
Macay, A.Western India: Reports Addressed to the Chambers of Commerce of Manchester, Liverpool, Blackburn, and Glasgow, London , 1853.
44.
Prakash, Gyan . Bonded Histories: Genealogies of Labour Servitude in Colonial India, Cambridge , 1990.
45.
Punekar, S.D. and R. Varickayil eds, Labour Movement in India Documents: 1850–1890 Volume 1: Mines and Plantations, Delhi , 1989.
46.
Siddiqi, Z.M.Z. ‘ Sanctions for the Breach of Contracts of Service (1843–1925) ’, Journal of the Indian Law Institute, Vol. 25 (3), 1983, p. 359 .
47.
Tyabji, Nasir . ‘ State Aid to Industry: Madras, 1921–1931 ’, Economic and Political Weekly (EPW), 30 June 1988, p. 56 .
48.
Washbrook, D.A. ‘ Law, State and Agrarian Society in Colonial India ’, Modern Asia Studies, Vol. 15 (3), 1981, pp. 662–63 .
